Seagull 362 Posted yesterday at 09:25 Report Share Posted yesterday at 09:25 10 minutes ago, lurcherman 887 said: Is this where Wilf lives Ireland has never recovered since their hero tapped out to a Rag Head. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
THE STIFFMEISTER 16,812 Posted yesterday at 09:35 Report Share Posted yesterday at 09:35 15 hours ago, kanny said: Just seen this ...kinell Fair play that lad in the cap , sitting that man down . Well played . I know we in general only ever encounter the police when there’s transgressions but things like that top trump any sort of council estate omerta. Well played him. who the f**k would be a copper these days ? 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Borr 7,669 Posted yesterday at 11:23 Report Share Posted yesterday at 11:23 17 hours ago, kanny said: Just seen this ...kinell When was this? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
kanny 21,622 Posted yesterday at 15:35 Report Share Posted yesterday at 15:35 4 hours ago, Borr said: When was this? Tuesday just gone ..29th Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Borr 7,669 Posted yesterday at 17:26 Report Share Posted yesterday at 17:26 1 hour ago, kanny said: Tuesday just gone ..29th Cheers yeah I had a look, haven't seen much about that on UK media...until now Quote Link to post Share on other sites
gnasher16 31,344 Posted 7 hours ago Report Share Posted 7 hours ago On 31/07/2025 at 13:28, Seagull said: Culture is not genetic even if genes can influence some behaviours. An adopted child born and raised in Japan and raised by Japanese foster parents will learn and adopt the Japanese culture regardless if they are ethnically Japanese, Norwegian, or Gambian. That's not word play, it's reality. The lurcher analogy doesn't wash mate, it's in every dogs instinct to chase rabbits, they are predators after all. And certain traits have been selectively bred for for generation after generation, humans haven't had targeted breeding programmes, they just breed and survive. Culture is not passed through DNA like eye colour or skin pigmentation, modern day Swedes share the same genetics as ancient Vikings yet their cultures are radically different. Adopted children don't inherit their biological parents culture, they may inherit certain behavioural traits but they will always adopt the culture they were raised in. You are clearly not understanding the basic difference between genetics in terms of raw material at a cellular level how traits are passed through genes within the science of heredity.....and genetic influence regards how that material shapes who we are and how it contributes to variations in particular observable traits, how its measured through statistical analysis of trait variations etc. The dog analogy obviously went straight over your head being a clear example of inherent behavioural traits and the extent to which a trait is influenced by genetic behaviour outside molecular or cellular level....exactly as it does with culture.....yes of course your Japanese boy could be raised in a culture which is not biologically his own but he is instinctively closer naturally to his own culture via genetic inheritance.....genes and cultures are connected streams of inheritance that shape human behaviour and cultural development. What you are throwing in there with a Japanese boy raised in a Norwegian culture is just basic nature versus nurture which is something the left have always used to manipulate language......the far left are at war with reality because reality produces unequal outcomes....its how they got the different sex and gender wedge through the door to where in their eyes gender is now " optional "......and likewise they do it with race,race is unalterable you cant " become " British for instance....yet they will persist with their silly word play strategies in order to get their own way enabling a " anyone can be anything " theory that protects their globalist multicultural agenda. Fortunately it doesnt matter if you/they believe or even acknowledge it as you are simply forced to accept it in the same way that i am forced to accept gravity. 3 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Seagull 362 Posted 5 hours ago Report Share Posted 5 hours ago 1 hour ago, gnasher16 said: You are clearly not understanding the basic difference between genetics in terms of raw material at a cellular level how traits are passed through genes within the science of heredity.....and genetic influence regards how that material shapes who we are and how it contributes to variations in particular observable traits, how its measured through statistical analysis of trait variations etc. The dog analogy obviously went straight over your head being a clear example of inherent behavioural traits and the extent to which a trait is influenced by genetic behaviour outside molecular or cellular level....exactly as it does with culture.....yes of course your Japanese boy could be raised in a culture which is not biologically his own but he is instinctively closer naturally to his own culture via genetic inheritance.....genes and cultures are connected streams of inheritance that shape human behaviour and cultural development. What you are throwing in there with a Japanese boy raised in a Norwegian culture is just basic nature versus nurture which is something the left have always used to manipulate language......the far left are at war with reality because reality produces unequal outcomes....its how they got the different sex and gender wedge through the door to where in their eyes gender is now " optional "......and likewise they do it with race,race is unalterable you cant " become " British for instance....yet they will persist with their silly word play strategies in order to get their own way enabling a " anyone can be anything " theory that protects their globalist multicultural agenda. Fortunately it doesnt matter if you/they believe or even acknowledge it as you are simply forced to accept it in the same way that i am forced to accept gravity. Politely you are just waffling now, again, you're confusing biological inheritance with cultural inheritance. Genes pass on biological traits, culture is passed on through society, not DNA. There's no such thing as a British gene that instinctually pulls us towards drinking tea, just like there's no Japanese gene that makes them obsessed with sumo wrestling lol. The lurcher analogy didn't go over my head, I saw it for the flawed reasoning that it still is. Again, a lurcher and many other breeds are selectivity bred for behavioural and/or physical traits. Humans are not dog breeds, we are not selectivity bred for behavioural traits or physical traits. So, another flawed idea of yours that isn't at all based in science is the false assumption that culture is governed by genetics, if it was tied to your DNA then your Japanese boy raised in Norway by Norwegian parents would still adopt the Japanese way of life when in reality he wouldn't. This is nothing to do with left vs right, it's about evidence not assumptions. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
THE STIFFMEISTER 16,812 Posted 4 hours ago Report Share Posted 4 hours ago 44 minutes ago, Seagull said: Politely you are just waffling now, again, you're confusing biological inheritance with cultural inheritance. Genes pass on biological traits, culture is passed on through society, not DNA. There's no such thing as a British gene that instinctually pulls us towards drinking tea, just like there's no Japanese gene that makes them obsessed with sumo wrestling lol. The lurcher analogy didn't go over my head, I saw it for the flawed reasoning that it still is. Again, a lurcher and many other breeds are selectivity bred for behavioural and/or physical traits. Humans are not dog breeds, we are not selectivity bred for behavioural traits or physical traits. So, another flawed idea of yours that isn't at all based in science is the false assumption that culture is governed by genetics, if it was tied to your DNA then your Japanese boy raised in Norway by Norwegian parents would still adopt the Japanese way of life when in reality he wouldn't. This is nothing to do with left vs right, it's about evidence not assumptions. But they were though !!! For hundreds of years in the slave trade . Thats why you don’t see nba players or linebackers walking around in Zambia or the drc randomly Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Seagull 362 Posted 4 hours ago Report Share Posted 4 hours ago 1 minute ago, THE STIFFMEISTER said: But they were though !!! For hundreds of years in the slave trade . Thats why you don’t see nba players or linebackers walking around in Zambia or the drc randomly That's just a half truth isn't it? You're talking as though they were selectively chosen because of their physical traits and then selectivity bred when the truth is they were just exploited people that happened to be enslaved. Why would you see linebackers in Zambia, I didnt know the NFL was in Africa? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
THE STIFFMEISTER 16,812 Posted 3 hours ago Report Share Posted 3 hours ago The physical attributes of nfl players and nba players are most advantageously going in African Americans they aren’t in the main found in Africans why is that ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
chartpolski 27,525 Posted 3 hours ago Report Share Posted 3 hours ago 6 minutes ago, THE STIFFMEISTER said: The physical attributes of nfl players and nba players are most advantageously going in African Americans they aren’t in the main found in Africans why is that ? At a wild guess I’d say because of western lifestyle, health care , food, nutrition, education , sanitary conditions, etc being far superior than africas ? But I feel your question may have been rhetorical! LOL ! Cheers. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Seagull 362 Posted 3 hours ago Report Share Posted 3 hours ago 16 minutes ago, THE STIFFMEISTER said: The physical attributes of nfl players and nba players are most advantageously going in African Americans they aren’t in the main found in Africans why is that ? You mean physical attributes created by nutrition, medicine, exercise, etc. It wasn't so long back we had a UFC HW champion born and bred in Africa. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
THE STIFFMEISTER 16,812 Posted 3 hours ago Report Share Posted 3 hours ago The physical attributes of nfl players and nba players are most advantageously going in African Americans they aren’t in the main found in Africans why is that ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
THE STIFFMEISTER 16,812 Posted 3 hours ago Report Share Posted 3 hours ago 8 minutes ago, chartpolski said: At a wild guess I’d say because of western lifestyle, health care , food, nutrition, education , sanitary conditions, etc being far superior than africas ? But I feel your question may have been rhetorical! LOL ! Cheers. All the above cannot make a 6 feet 4 100kg man capable of doing 40 yds in a hiccup over 4 secs It has to be there to be found Quote Link to post Share on other sites
THE STIFFMEISTER 16,812 Posted 3 hours ago Report Share Posted 3 hours ago 1 minute ago, Seagull said: You mean physical attributes created by nutrition, medicine, exercise, etc. It wasn't so long back we had a UFC HW champion born and bred in Africa. Yeah and what’s his background ?? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.