Accip74 7,112 Posted January 5, 2021 Author Report Share Posted January 5, 2021 6 minutes ago, Balaur said: Well the question is, maybe BH can enlighten us more... But I vaguely remember seeing details of first jab 52% effective second 94% , I by no means stand by this made up barely remembered numbers, but if they were the truth then is save half of vulnerable or nearly all. To call it a good idea accip maybe you have the numbers? You think if I had the numbers I’d be sat here taking shit in the general section of the thl? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Accip74 7,112 Posted January 5, 2021 Author Report Share Posted January 5, 2021 Just now, Balaur said: BH does hahaha... Yes but BH can clearly multitask 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Born Hunter 17,639 Posted January 5, 2021 Report Share Posted January 5, 2021 1 minute ago, Balaur said: BH does hahaha... I've sort of had Xmas off so I'm catching up a bit. Here's some numbers that I have to hand for the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine (AZD1222). Back in November they published interim Phase 3 results which said that a full dose followed by another full dose some time later (either a fortnight or four weeks iirc) showed 62% efficacy. While a smaller trial of a half dose followed by a full dose some time later showed 90% efficacy. Combining these they published 70% efficacy for their vaccine. There has been an exploratory analysis on a single full dose regime which has showed 73% efficacy within 22 days of being jabbed. It's being suggested that one dose will give good immunity to 12 weeks.... Because the datasets are relatively small there is a fair bit of error associated with these numbers though. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
hambone 948 Posted January 5, 2021 Report Share Posted January 5, 2021 (edited) 19 minutes ago, Balaur said: Well the question is, maybe BH can enlighten us more... But I vaguely remember seeing details of first jab 52% effective second 94% , I by no means stand by this made up barely remembered numbers, but if they were the truth then is save half of vulnerable or nearly all. To call it a good idea accip maybe you have the numbers? On Sky news yesterday 89% first jab...95% second Didn't notice what make tho. Edited January 5, 2021 by hambone 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Born Hunter 17,639 Posted January 5, 2021 Report Share Posted January 5, 2021 7 minutes ago, hambone said: On Sky news yesterday 89% first jab...95% second Didn't notice what make tho. Pfizer. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
WILF 44,358 Posted January 5, 2021 Report Share Posted January 5, 2021 There’s being objective, nothing wrong with that, and there’s allowing a bloke who almost single handedly re-engineered the country into the f***ing hideous joke we see today back near any kind of power ! f**k objective, fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me ! f**k him ! 5 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Nicepix 5,650 Posted January 5, 2021 Report Share Posted January 5, 2021 8 hours ago, chartpolski said: In our adversarial political system, the status quo is to refute and attack the views of the other side, even when you know they are right. So, isn't it even a little bit encouraging that Farage is agreeing with someone who is on the opposite end of the political spectrum when he thinks they are right ? I'll add a caveat, though; if Blair said it was raining, I'd still look out the widow to make sure he wasn't lying !! Cheers. He's not alone though. The other day Macron's father gave a magazine an interview where he called Macron Junior self-serving, insincere and narcissist. And they were just the good points 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
shovel leaner 7,648 Posted January 5, 2021 Report Share Posted January 5, 2021 I’m a mild mannered person who doesn’t usually let people get under my skin but Tony and Cherie Blair are two people that I feel hatred towards. That is a powerful emotion for people I’ve never met but they are both vile , corrupt , despoilers of a way of life in this country . I will never forgive or forget the hunting act which Cherie pushed for . Nigel Farage usually sees things from a common sense point of view but he has got it very wrong in thinking that man has anything to offer this country . 4 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Meece 1,957 Posted January 5, 2021 Report Share Posted January 5, 2021 It must be fake news .!! Not Nige Perhaps Nige was lining b liar up for the new role of 5th under lavatory attendant in the commons. In the season of goodwill to all men. Part time though mind. Or on a zero hour jobby. Everyone has got to be adaptable in these covid times. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
PLEDGEY 493 Posted January 5, 2021 Report Share Posted January 5, 2021 Blair=c**t......end of. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
low plains drifter 9,471 Posted January 5, 2021 Report Share Posted January 5, 2021 6 hours ago, Born Hunter said: I don't really have a problem with him or his opinion. I don't think less of him for the view he has shared. And my view would probably get me prosecuted or at least reprimanded if shared in a more public forum. Blame Woke Wilf Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Accip74 7,112 Posted January 7, 2021 Author Report Share Posted January 7, 2021 3 hours ago, Balaur said: Farage digging a hole, I'll be honest I posted a video of Blair sticking his nose in to the pandemic, if he's right on the focus on first dose business , either the government was as well and let him jump them , or they weren't , or members of the scientific community decided to make it political by feeding Blair information or all or none of the above.....lol. Again I think there’s some good points there. But maybe many would rather do more lockdown time than use Blair! 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
dytkos 17,536 Posted January 7, 2021 Report Share Posted January 7, 2021 If Tony B. Liar said it was dark I'd have to open the curtains to check. One of the biggest wankers ever in politics, and there's been plenty. Cheers, D. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.