BGD 6,437 Posted December 9, 2016 Author Report Share Posted December 9, 2016 Multiple front page stories in all the papers, leading the TV news when there's been new developments in the cases, documentaries investigating the problem, inquiries, questions raised in parliament. Is that what you call little or no attention? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
WILF 50,197 Posted December 9, 2016 Report Share Posted December 9, 2016 And when did any of that happen? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
General lee 979 Posted December 9, 2016 Report Share Posted December 9, 2016 So we know theres a problem, whats the answer, castration, execution. I'd execute every last 1 of them I think they should have all there belongings sold and donated to charity then strip them lock them in cages in laboratorys and test medical treatments on them no more animal testing and when they die dispose of the body medical science would come forward in leaps and bounds with human testing if you can call them human Quote Link to post Share on other sites
BGD 6,437 Posted December 9, 2016 Author Report Share Posted December 9, 2016 And when did any of that happen? Case of seeing what you want to see here pal, try googling "grooming gangs front pages" to get a small snapshot of the level of media coverage. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Accip74 7,112 Posted December 9, 2016 Report Share Posted December 9, 2016 (edited) The grooming gangs were all over the media when the story broke just like Saville with countless news reports and various documentaries investigating the problem? They still get the odd mention now."All over the media".......what, in the same way old white blokes from the entertainment industry were?Nah, I don't f***ing think so mate.......same as whisper about former MPs isn't exactly front page news every day. Coincidence ?......... I wonder why well known celebrities being caught up in an abuse scandal got more column inches, a total mystery!Come on pal, you are a bit smarter than that.....don't be deliberately obtuse Look, I can accept that this type of behaviour is not exclusive to immigrants or their offspring and I can also understand why a bloke of your political persuasion starts a thread like this when you see paki rape gangs constantly mentioned with regards to sex crimes against vulnerable children because it isn't just solely and asian problem. I can even accept that a "celebrity" is more newsworthy than a corner shop owner from Bradford.......but I can't accept that sex crime on this scale would not be news at all or warrant very little attention when in fact one group get massive attention and the other get little or nothing........that's no accident and you know it. You can't have it both ways. You want an impartial news, but want this covered more than anything else? As far as I could see it was a massive story. I only get BBC news here, but I saw plenty about it. What do you want, nightly blanket coverage & nothing else?If you want to know about it, it's there..........but as usual, the masses are more interested in the banal. Saville was an obvious a bigger story. It's easier for the masses to get their teeth into, but I still think there was a pathetic response from the public, when you think about his friends, including royals that said fcuk all! In fact we've got two prominent royals that both had very close friendships with definite pedophiles & no one is saying fcuking word! I think the BBC is bias about a lot of shit.....but these stories are there for everyone to see. It's almost like some want there to be more of a diversion than there actually is......I can understand the paranoia after the obvious cover up to begin with. As an aside. Belgium had a hideous pedophile case in the 90's & it's obvious there was a cover up that may of been protecting people in high places. 300,000 people marched on Brussels, the biggest turn out since the 2nd world war. Of course it did no fcuking good, but it showed massive feeling... What did the british public do after saville & Rotherham? Turn the page & look at the xfactor results? & I ant no left wing apologist, before the usual crowd get over excited! Haha... Although I suppose you could argue the referendum was a response to some of it.... Edited December 9, 2016 by Accip74 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Silversnake 1,099 Posted December 9, 2016 Report Share Posted December 9, 2016 The grooming gangs were all over the media when the story broke just like Saville with countless news reports and various documentaries investigating the problem? They still get the odd mention now."All over the media".......what, in the same way old white blokes from the entertainment industry were?Nah, I don't f***ing think so mate.......same as whisper about former MPs isn't exactly front page news every day. Coincidence ?......... I wonder why well known celebrities being caught up in an abuse scandal got more column inches, a total mystery!Come on pal, you are a bit smarter than that.....don't be deliberately obtuse Look, I can accept that this type of behaviour is not exclusive to immigrants or their offspring and I can also understand why a bloke of your political persuasion starts a thread like this when you see paki rape gangs constantly mentioned with regards to sex crimes against vulnerable children because it isn't just solely and asian problem. I can even accept that a "celebrity" is more newsworthy than a corner shop owner from Bradford.......but I can't accept that sex crime on this scale would not be news at all or warrant very little attention when in fact one group get massive attention and the other get little or nothing........that's no accident and you know it. You can't have it both ways. You want an impartial news, but want this covered more than anything else? As far as I could see it was a massive story. I only get BBC news here, but I saw plenty about it. What do you want, nightly blanket coverage & nothing else?If you want to know about it, it's there..........but as usual, the masses are more interested in the banal. Saville was an obvious a bigger story. It's easier for the masses to get their teeth into, but I still think there was a pathetic response from the public, when you think about his friends, including royals that said fcuk all! I think the BBC is bias about a lot of shit.....but these stories are there for everyone to see. It's almost like some want there to be more of a diversion than there actually is......I can understand the paranoia after the obvious cover up to begin with. As an aside. Belgium had a hideous pedophile case in the 90's & it's obvious there was a cover up that may of been protecting people in high places. 300,000 people marched on Brussels, the biggest turn out since the 2nd world war. Of course it did no fcuking good, but it showed massive feeling... What did the british public do after saville & Rotherham? Turn the page & look at the xfactor results? Although I suppose you could argue the referendum was a response to some of it.... Did the MSM scream for blood? Did they try to dig up information by getting amongst the grooming gangs and using all the tricks and technology available to them? The MSM use these tactics and many many more dirty tricks when it suits them. What better reason to be outraged and use any tricks you can think of than when children are getting prostituted and gang raped? The MSM put more effort into Kim kardashians naked selfies than the grooming gangs which by the way are not only in Rotherham, but you would think it was isolated there if you only followed the MSM reports. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jacknife 2,005 Posted December 9, 2016 Report Share Posted December 9, 2016 Not a lot could be done about saville he was dead You can no longer speak out against Muslims in this country.......the grooming gangs all had a word at the beginning Muslim Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Accip74 7,112 Posted December 9, 2016 Report Share Posted December 9, 2016 The grooming gangs were all over the media when the story broke just like Saville with countless news reports and various documentaries investigating the problem? They still get the odd mention now."All over the media".......what, in the same way old white blokes from the entertainment industry were?Nah, I don't f***ing think so mate.......same as whisper about former MPs isn't exactly front page news every day. Coincidence ?......... I wonder why well known celebrities being caught up in an abuse scandal got more column inches, a total mystery!Come on pal, you are a bit smarter than that.....don't be deliberately obtuse Look, I can accept that this type of behaviour is not exclusive to immigrants or their offspring and I can also understand why a bloke of your political persuasion starts a thread like this when you see paki rape gangs constantly mentioned with regards to sex crimes against vulnerable children because it isn't just solely and asian problem. I can even accept that a "celebrity" is more newsworthy than a corner shop owner from Bradford.......but I can't accept that sex crime on this scale would not be news at all or warrant very little attention when in fact one group get massive attention and the other get little or nothing........that's no accident and you know it. You can't have it both ways. You want an impartial news, but want this covered more than anything else? As far as I could see it was a massive story. I only get BBC news here, but I saw plenty about it. What do you want, nightly blanket coverage & nothing else?If you want to know about it, it's there..........but as usual, the masses are more interested in the banal. Saville was an obvious a bigger story. It's easier for the masses to get their teeth into, but I still think there was a pathetic response from the public, when you think about his friends, including royals that said fcuk all! I think the BBC is bias about a lot of shit.....but these stories are there for everyone to see. It's almost like some want there to be more of a diversion than there actually is......I can understand the paranoia after the obvious cover up to begin with. As an aside. Belgium had a hideous pedophile case in the 90's & it's obvious there was a cover up that may of been protecting people in high places. 300,000 people marched on Brussels, the biggest turn out since the 2nd world war. Of course it did no fcuking good, but it showed massive feeling... What did the british public do after saville & Rotherham? Turn the page & look at the xfactor results? Although I suppose you could argue the referendum was a response to some of it.... Did the MSM scream for blood? Did they try to dig up information by getting amongst the grooming gangs and using all the tricks and technology available to them? The MSM use these tactics and many many more dirty tricks when it suits them. What better reason to be outraged and use any tricks you can think of than when children are getting prostituted and gang raped? The MSM put more effort into Kim kardashians naked selfies than the grooming gangs which by the way are not only in Rotherham, but you would think it was isolated there if you only followed the MSM reports. There you go, Kim Kardashian is perfect example of greater appetite for this shit from the public. I ain't defending the msm, but just saying how I see it. I didn't struggle to find stories about Rotherham.......so don't drag me into your paranoia! Haha Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Accip74 7,112 Posted December 9, 2016 Report Share Posted December 9, 2016 Not a lot could be done about saville he was dead You can no longer speak out against Muslims in this country.......the grooming gangs all had a word at the beginning Muslim Yes saville was dead, but a lot protecting him or turning a blind eye are not. Including members of the royal family. But yes you are right, the media are reluctant to be forthright in their reporting on Muslim crimes, but we all still know about it. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
tatsblisters 10,956 Posted December 9, 2016 Report Share Posted December 9, 2016 It does piss me off though every time some one mentions muslim grooming gangs all the lefty SWP types can counter with is f****n Jimmy fekin savill like has been said hes dead thank feck just wish the four members of one Pakistani family serving time for the CSE in Rotherham were as well. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Accip74 7,112 Posted December 9, 2016 Report Share Posted December 9, 2016 It does piss me off though every time some one mentions muslim grooming gangs all the lefty SWP types can counter with is f****n Jimmy fekin savill like has been said hes dead thank feck just wish the four members of one Pakistani family serving time for the CSE in Rotherham were as well. I agree mate, but it works both ways I think.........they've reported 83 suspects & 98 clubs this morning regarding the abuse in football, but some would rather ignore this & scream "what about Muslims!" Is that a diversion? Like I said before....all this shite has equal importance when we are talking abusing kids. 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Silversnake 1,099 Posted December 9, 2016 Report Share Posted December 9, 2016 The grooming gangs were all over the media when the story broke just like Saville with countless news reports and various documentaries investigating the problem? They still get the odd mention now."All over the media".......what, in the same way old white blokes from the entertainment industry were?Nah, I don't f***ing think so mate.......same as whisper about former MPs isn't exactly front page news every day. Coincidence ?......... I wonder why well known celebrities being caught up in an abuse scandal got more column inches, a total mystery!Come on pal, you are a bit smarter than that.....don't be deliberately obtuse Look, I can accept that this type of behaviour is not exclusive to immigrants or their offspring and I can also understand why a bloke of your political persuasion starts a thread like this when you see paki rape gangs constantly mentioned with regards to sex crimes against vulnerable children because it isn't just solely and asian problem. I can even accept that a "celebrity" is more newsworthy than a corner shop owner from Bradford.......but I can't accept that sex crime on this scale would not be news at all or warrant very little attention when in fact one group get massive attention and the other get little or nothing........that's no accident and you know it. You can't have it both ways. You want an impartial news, but want this covered more than anything else? As far as I could see it was a massive story. I only get BBC news here, but I saw plenty about it. What do you want, nightly blanket coverage & nothing else?If you want to know about it, it's there..........but as usual, the masses are more interested in the banal. Saville was an obvious a bigger story. It's easier for the masses to get their teeth into, but I still think there was a pathetic response from the public, when you think about his friends, including royals that said fcuk all! I think the BBC is bias about a lot of shit.....but these stories are there for everyone to see. It's almost like some want there to be more of a diversion than there actually is......I can understand the paranoia after the obvious cover up to begin with. As an aside. Belgium had a hideous pedophile case in the 90's & it's obvious there was a cover up that may of been protecting people in high places. 300,000 people marched on Brussels, the biggest turn out since the 2nd world war. Of course it did no fcuking good, but it showed massive feeling... What did the british public do after saville & Rotherham? Turn the page & look at the xfactor results? Although I suppose you could argue the referendum was a response to some of it.... Did the MSM scream for blood? Did they try to dig up information by getting amongst the grooming gangs and using all the tricks and technology available to them? The MSM use these tactics and many many more dirty tricks when it suits them. What better reason to be outraged and use any tricks you can think of than when children are getting prostituted and gang raped? The MSM put more effort into Kim kardashians naked selfies than the grooming gangs which by the way are not only in Rotherham, but you would think it was isolated there if you only followed the MSM reports.There you go, Kim Kardashian is perfect example of greater appetite for this shit from the public. I ain't defending the msm, but just saying how I see it. I didn't struggle to find stories about Rotherham.......so don't drag me into your paranoia! HahaIf Pakistani grooming gangs aren't enough to make you paranoid then nothing I say possibly could... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Accip74 7,112 Posted December 9, 2016 Report Share Posted December 9, 2016 The grooming gangs were all over the media when the story broke just like Saville with countless news reports and various documentaries investigating the problem? They still get the odd mention now."All over the media".......what, in the same way old white blokes from the entertainment industry were?Nah, I don't f***ing think so mate.......same as whisper about former MPs isn't exactly front page news every day. Coincidence ?......... I wonder why well known celebrities being caught up in an abuse scandal got more column inches, a total mystery!Come on pal, you are a bit smarter than that.....don't be deliberately obtuse Look, I can accept that this type of behaviour is not exclusive to immigrants or their offspring and I can also understand why a bloke of your political persuasion starts a thread like this when you see paki rape gangs constantly mentioned with regards to sex crimes against vulnerable children because it isn't just solely and asian problem. I can even accept that a "celebrity" is more newsworthy than a corner shop owner from Bradford.......but I can't accept that sex crime on this scale would not be news at all or warrant very little attention when in fact one group get massive attention and the other get little or nothing........that's no accident and you know it. You can't have it both ways. You want an impartial news, but want this covered more than anything else? As far as I could see it was a massive story. I only get BBC news here, but I saw plenty about it. What do you want, nightly blanket coverage & nothing else?If you want to know about it, it's there..........but as usual, the masses are more interested in the banal. Saville was an obvious a bigger story. It's easier for the masses to get their teeth into, but I still think there was a pathetic response from the public, when you think about his friends, including royals that said fcuk all! I think the BBC is bias about a lot of shit.....but these stories are there for everyone to see. It's almost like some want there to be more of a diversion than there actually is......I can understand the paranoia after the obvious cover up to begin with. As an aside. Belgium had a hideous pedophile case in the 90's & it's obvious there was a cover up that may of been protecting people in high places. 300,000 people marched on Brussels, the biggest turn out since the 2nd world war. Of course it did no fcuking good, but it showed massive feeling... What did the british public do after saville & Rotherham? Turn the page & look at the xfactor results? Although I suppose you could argue the referendum was a response to some of it.... Did the MSM scream for blood? Did they try to dig up information by getting amongst the grooming gangs and using all the tricks and technology available to them? The MSM use these tactics and many many more dirty tricks when it suits them. What better reason to be outraged and use any tricks you can think of than when children are getting prostituted and gang raped? The MSM put more effort into Kim kardashians naked selfies than the grooming gangs which by the way are not only in Rotherham, but you would think it was isolated there if you only followed the MSM reports.There you go, Kim Kardashian is perfect example of greater appetite for this shit from the public. I ain't defending the msm, but just saying how I see it. I didn't struggle to find stories about Rotherham.......so don't drag me into your paranoia! HahaIf Pakistani grooming gangs aren't enough to make you paranoid then nothing I say possibly could... Why would they make me paranoid. I know they exist & I know it was covered up by left wing lunatics.... ....& how do I know this? I watched the news.... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jacknife 2,005 Posted December 9, 2016 Report Share Posted December 9, 2016 But well have to see if there guilty yet the same happened with Saville there was a witch hunt but in the end it was something like 2 or 3 who were guilty of child abuse The others tended to be things like someone saying Freddie star toucher her bum back in the 70s Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Accip74 7,112 Posted December 9, 2016 Report Share Posted December 9, 2016 (edited) But well have to see if there guilty yet the same happened with Saville there was a witch hunt but in the end it was something like 2 or 3 who were guilty of child abuse The others tended to be things like someone saying Freddie star toucher her bum back in the 70s I don't buy a lot of the witch hunt stuff either. He was dead, so they tried to make amends. That doesn't excuse the obvious protection he enjoyed. I'll say it again. 2 of our most prominent members of the royal family had close friends that were pedophiles & no one gives a fcuk. It ain't just Muslim stories that get ignored. Edited December 9, 2016 by Accip74 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.