brookie 1,193 Posted January 28, 2009 Report Share Posted January 28, 2009 everyone should read this and post theyr opinion at this atrocity http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11...n-adoption.html Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Onan 6 Posted January 28, 2009 Report Share Posted January 28, 2009 Welcome to England,a country now run by complete incompetent who don't have a clue about the real world.This country is quiclky slipping down the pan and personally i don't think it will be long before the whole lot goes BANG!...In the worlds of Lord Baden Powell"BE PREPARED" Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ulverston moocher 60 Posted January 28, 2009 Report Share Posted January 28, 2009 compleatly wrong on so many levels who would in there right mind put two young kiddes through the care system aspecialy when they have family who whant them this is a piss take two mushys carnt have kids for a f*****g reason and only a pair of sick fucks would do this to the kids :realmad: Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JPTfellterrier 65 Posted January 28, 2009 Report Share Posted January 28, 2009 so wrong, the grand perants arnt too old at all....46 and 59 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
undisputed 1,664 Posted January 28, 2009 Report Share Posted January 28, 2009 (edited) everyone should read this and post theyr opinion at this atrocity http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11...n-adoption.html Ok before we start lighting the bonfires and burning social workers at the stake consider this. This decision would not have been made by a basic grade social worker. This is a higher management decision and it's them that should be the focus of your anger. Remember also you are only getting a pen picture of this whole affair and not the complete story. There are reasons why the grandparents can not look after the children whether it is health or some other issue and again we dont know all the facts. In every case before a child is placed in any form of care the SWD should exaust all other options including extended family. If there is no-one suitable among the family members other options will be considered including residential and foster care. I dont know and neither does anyone else in here what the FULL FACTS are, and before anyone says owt I am not in favour of gay adoption, but I dont suppose any of this will get in the way of a good lynching.....Hang em High boys! Edited January 28, 2009 by undisputed Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest bharraigh Posted January 28, 2009 Report Share Posted January 28, 2009 everyone should read this and post theyr opinion at this atrocity http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11...n-adoption.html Ok before we start lighting the bonfires and burning social workers at the stake consider this. This decision would not have been made by a basic grade social worker. This is a higher management decision and it's them that should be the focus of your anger. Remember also you are only getting a pen picture of this whole affair and not the complete story. There are reasons why the grandparents can not look after the children whether it is health or some other issue and again we dont know all the facts. In every case before a child is placed in any form of care the SWD should exaust all other options including extended family. If there is no-one suitable among the family members other options will be considered including residential and foster care. I dont know and neither does anyone else in here what the FULL FACTS are, and before anyone says owt I am not in favour of gay adoption, but I dont suppose any of this will get in the way of a good lynching.....Hang em High boys! there not thinking about the weans welfare if you ask me, just pandering to the homo movement by letting them adopt. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
undisputed 1,664 Posted January 28, 2009 Report Share Posted January 28, 2009 everyone should read this and post theyr opinion at this atrocity http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11...n-adoption.html Ok before we start lighting the bonfires and burning social workers at the stake consider this. This decision would not have been made by a basic grade social worker. This is a higher management decision and it's them that should be the focus of your anger. Remember also you are only getting a pen picture of this whole affair and not the complete story. There are reasons why the grandparents can not look after the children whether it is health or some other issue and again we dont know all the facts. In every case before a child is placed in any form of care the SWD should exaust all other options including extended family. If there is no-one suitable among the family members other options will be considered including residential and foster care. I dont know and neither does anyone else in here what the FULL FACTS are, and before anyone says owt I am not in favour of gay adoption, but I dont suppose any of this will get in the way of a good lynching.....Hang em High boys! there not thinking about the weans welfare if you ask me, just pandering to the homo movement by letting them adopt. Theres a lot more to this story thans being written about Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest bharraigh Posted January 28, 2009 Report Share Posted January 28, 2009 everyone should read this and post theyr opinion at this atrocity http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11...n-adoption.html Ok before we start lighting the bonfires and burning social workers at the stake consider this. This decision would not have been made by a basic grade social worker. This is a higher management decision and it's them that should be the focus of your anger. Remember also you are only getting a pen picture of this whole affair and not the complete story. There are reasons why the grandparents can not look after the children whether it is health or some other issue and again we dont know all the facts. In every case before a child is placed in any form of care the SWD should exaust all other options including extended family. If there is no-one suitable among the family members other options will be considered including residential and foster care. I dont know and neither does anyone else in here what the FULL FACTS are, and before anyone says owt I am not in favour of gay adoption, but I dont suppose any of this will get in the way of a good lynching.....Hang em High boys! there not thinking about the weans welfare if you ask me, just pandering to the homo movement by letting them adopt. Theres a lot more to this story thans being written about well the media always like tou get the mixing spoon out. as i know a few good boys who have been splashed over the papers with nonsense press printed about them. but basically, eversince homos have been aloud to adopt, the social services will have a certain quotation of kids who have to go tho homo couples, contact there head office and ask about it for those of you who have their doubts. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Leeview 787 Posted January 28, 2009 Report Share Posted January 28, 2009 those last 2 lines spoke volumes MSP accepted the descision although 90% of the public were opposed to it another case of MP's going against an inquiries majority. SMACKS of we can and we will do as we please Y.I.S Leeview Quote Link to post Share on other sites
brookie 1,193 Posted January 28, 2009 Author Report Share Posted January 28, 2009 everyone should read this and post theyr opinion at this atrocity http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11...n-adoption.html Ok before we start lighting the bonfires and burning social workers at the stake consider this. This decision would not have been made by a basic grade social worker. This is a higher management decision and it's them that should be the focus of your anger. Remember also you are only getting a pen picture of this whole affair and not the complete story. There are reasons why the grandparents can not look after the children whether it is health or some other issue and again we dont know all the facts. In every case before a child is placed in any form of care the SWD should exaust all other options including extended family. If there is no-one suitable among the family members other options will be considered including residential and foster care. I dont know and neither does anyone else in here what the FULL FACTS are, and before anyone says owt I am not in favour of gay adoption, but I dont suppose any of this will get in the way of a good lynching.....Hang em High boys! the facts of this case are that the social services are going to place two innocent children into the care of two arse bandits who ever made this decision should not be in the job they are supposed to be doing if they think its in the childrens interests to be placed into that enviroment with queers Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Guest mickyrichardson Posted January 28, 2009 Report Share Posted January 28, 2009 Undisputed are you a social worker by any chance Quote Link to post Share on other sites
droid 11 Posted January 28, 2009 Report Share Posted January 28, 2009 Hang on, we're talking about the Daily Wail here, not a paper that's renowned for its' in depth reporting and analysis. I'm with undisputed on this one: there's more to this than meets the eye. And no, I'm not a Social Worker and never have been. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
artic 595 Posted January 28, 2009 Report Share Posted January 28, 2009 Hang on, we're talking about the Daily Wail here, not a paper that's renowned for its' in depth reporting and analysis. I'm with undisputed on this one: there's more to this than meets the eye. And no, I'm not a Social Worker and never have been. Yes they can hold hands with "The Guardian" Oh and there is much much more than meets the eye to this Rickatoo story! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
para1 11 Posted January 28, 2009 Report Share Posted January 28, 2009 Hang on, we're talking about the Daily Wail here, not a paper that's renowned for its' in depth reporting and analysis. I'm with undisputed on this one: there's more to this than meets the eye. And no, I'm not a Social Worker and never have been. If your not a Social worker you and undisputed are shirt lifters. Disgusting this should never happen anyone thinking otherwise is sick. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
klarakoi 0 Posted January 28, 2009 Report Share Posted January 28, 2009 supposedly democratic state, 90% opposition,,, Cromwell must be turning in his grave, Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.