mC HULL 15,808 Posted June 10 Report Share Posted June 10 (edited) 4 minutes ago, chartpolski said: It’s more like a refined paraffin, but they all come from the same source, oil , just refined to different levels. Cheers. it was saying it more combusts doesnt ignite as easy isnt as volatile as petrol doesnt need a spark i was thinking it was more volatile then petrol but makes sense up there Edited June 10 by mC HULL Quote Link to post Share on other sites
chartpolski 27,862 Posted June 10 Report Share Posted June 10 1 minute ago, mC HULL said: it was saying it more combusts doesnt ignite as easy isnt as volatile as petrol doesnt need a spark i was thinking it was more volatile then petrol but makes sense up there See, your uncle Charts looks after your education ! LOL ! Cheers. 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mC HULL 15,808 Posted June 10 Report Share Posted June 10 46 minutes ago, chartpolski said: See, your uncle Charts looks after your education ! LOL ! Cheers. i can remember saying to the snap on man give me them ratchets with the button on the back it’s solid getting sockets off with oil on em he said it’s for nasa and the aeroplane industries so sockets cant fall off in places cause catastrophes lol sales men come out with some belters lol Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Pardus 1,610 Posted June 10 Report Share Posted June 10 No Big Bang, more like the Big Bounce? New paper suggests that the Big Bang wasn't the beginning after all WWW.UNEXPLAINED-MYSTERIES.COM What if the Big Bang wasn't the start of all things, but a rebound from a colossal gravitational collapse ? 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Francie, 2,809 Posted June 10 Report Share Posted June 10 2 hours ago, chartpolski said: Because it’s a series of time frame stills and the earth doesn’t have a permanent dark side , but the moon does ? Just my guess , Francie, I could be wrong and don’t want a debate, mate . Cheers. The moon has a permanent darkside from earth because of its rotation,but how can the earth be lit up an the moon not,when it's directly in front of it,I think there taking a serious piss out of us. The camera is on a satellite orbiting the sun.a million miles away apparently. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Pardus 1,610 Posted June 10 Report Share Posted June 10 14 minutes ago, Francie, said: The moon has a permanent darkside from earth because of its rotation,but how can the earth be lit up an the moon not,when it's directly in front of it,I think there taking a serious piss out of us. The camera is on a satellite orbiting the sun.a million miles away apparently. Yes, they are that incompetent they would forget all that wouldn't they? 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Francie, 2,809 Posted June 10 Report Share Posted June 10 10 minutes ago, Pardus said: Yes, they are that incompetent they would forget all that wouldn't they? No I think there doing it on purpose lol Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Pardus 1,610 Posted June 10 Report Share Posted June 10 7 minutes ago, Francie, said: No I think there doing it on purpose lol You are in fantasy land mate, yeah, it's all a big con. Lol Quote Link to post Share on other sites
chartpolski 27,862 Posted June 10 Report Share Posted June 10 1 hour ago, mC HULL said: i can remember saying to the snap on man give me them ratchets with the button on the back it’s solid getting sockets off with oil on em he said it’s for nasa and the aeroplane industries so sockets cant fall off in places cause catastrophes lol sales men come out with some belters lol It could be true, imagine the damage if a jet engine was started with a socket inside it ? Or the cost of the strip down to retrieve a dropped socket ? Cheers. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mushroom 14,063 Posted June 10 Report Share Posted June 10 1 minute ago, chartpolski said: It could be true, imagine the damage if a jet engine was started with a socket inside it ? Or the cost of the strip down to retrieve a dropped socket ? Cheers. It would exploded on initial spinning Quote Link to post Share on other sites
shaaark 11,392 Posted June 10 Report Share Posted June 10 1 hour ago, Pardus said: No Big Bang, more like the Big Bounce? New paper suggests that the Big Bang wasn't the beginning after all WWW.UNEXPLAINED-MYSTERIES.COM What if the Big Bang wasn't the start of all things, but a rebound from a colossal gravitational collapse ? Yep, I always had trouble accepting that quantum exclusion principle. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Born Hunter 17,910 Posted June 10 Report Share Posted June 10 5 hours ago, Francie, said: Does it look real to you mate? How come the whole earth is lit up but the moon ain't? Pure speculation but knowing the earth is much much brighter than the moon either the camera settings or post processing of the image has reduced the overall image brightness to stop the earth whiting out. Consequently the moon now looks dull. Like when you photograph a close by object with the sun in the background. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Born Hunter 17,910 Posted June 10 Report Share Posted June 10 You’ll also notice there are no visible stars in the image, because again the camera or image settings have been optimised to resolve the earth, the stars are then effectively drowned out. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Pardus 1,610 Posted June 10 Report Share Posted June 10 Just now, Born Hunter said: You’ll also notice there are no visible stars in the image, because again the camera or image settings have been optimised to resolve the earth, the stars are then effectively drowned out. The images often looked photoshopped because they are. As I said earlier, they don't take pics with a Nikon DSLR, their cameras will be more specialised to make them more useful for studying planets and moons. I imagine they record in infrared, UV, X-ray, etc. It's like studying the sun, it would be pointless studying the sun off photos that show us what the naked eye sees. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
shaaark 11,392 Posted June 10 Report Share Posted June 10 1 hour ago, Pardus said: The images often looked photoshopped because they are. As I said earlier, they don't take pics with a Nikon DSLR, their cameras will be more specialised to make them more useful for studying planets and moons. I imagine they record in infrared, UV, X-ray, etc. It's like studying the sun, it would be pointless studying the sun off photos that show us what the naked eye sees. Oh, undoubtedly. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.