Jump to content

Recommended Posts

27 minutes ago, Pardus said:

Your justification won't wash with me, god is punishing women by rape if their husband does not obey, some God eh.

Were did you pull that passage from because I just looked there an this is what the King James says

Thou shalt betroth a wife, and another man shall lie with her: thou shalt build an house, and thou shalt not dwell therein: thou shalt plant a vineyard, and shalt not gather the grapes thereof.

tbh I'm going to look at these other publications,I know the kj the verified translation,but I don't know about most of these other ones,there's alot I just seen,an I don't think I'd trust them

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Mate ,a few yrs back...you was sat behind the settee,peaking out the patio door...to scared to go out and pick your dogshit up lol,THL's very own shithouse...🤣that speaks volumes,on the sort of person

What like covid? Haha haha

Anyhow, it’s not evolution , but I’ve got a call duck to hatch a brood of Irish Gamefowl;  Well, it could be something to do with evolution, ducks and chickens probably have a common avian

Posted Images

5 minutes ago, Daniel cain said:

That mad cnut believes in Aliens 🤣

Ordered it, had a very quick think, then had a word with myself and cancelled the order!!  😄 👍

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, Pardus said:

Do you believe in the use of condoms or the pill?

This is the last reply about God in this topic,start a another thread an we'll chat,I never have used condoms or pills

Start another topic an we'll chat

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, Francie, said:

This is the last reply about God in this topic,start a another thread an we'll chat,I never have used condoms or pills

Start another topic an we'll chat

A condom could have prevented this. 

  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Francie, said:

Were did you pull that passage from because I just looked there an this is what the King James says

Thou shalt betroth a wife, and another man shall lie with her: thou shalt build an house, and thou shalt not dwell therein: thou shalt plant a vineyard, and shalt not gather the grapes thereof.

tbh I'm going to look at these other publications,I know the kj the verified translation,but I don't know about most of these other ones,there's alot I just seen,an I don't think I'd trust them

 

Screenshot_20250609-185627.png

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Daniel cain said:

There's plenty of evidence that's been proved through the Bible lads,if you take the time and have a read....then a lot of Today's madness going on in the world is explained/predicted ...

How true is the paragraph below?😁Screenshot_20250609-114351.png.881104338f853adc5be9a8dc8fc65de4.png

 

 

 

Is there any evidence that the Bible is true?
 
 
There is, for instance, physical evidence. We have copies of the manuscripts and throughout history these copies show that the Bible has been transmitted accurately. Despite common skeptical claims that the Bible has often been changed through the centuries, the physical evidence tells another story.
 
I was a non believer myself for yrs,for my own personal reasons...but I picked it up and started reading it 4/5 yrs ago....and it started making sense,the people that govern us,don't want you having faith/beliefs, because they can't control you 🤣 that's why religion is attacked from every angle...its become a dirty word...the mad thing is....those that have faith like the Jews, Catholics, Muslims are the ones thriving ,sticking together,looking after their own,while the rest of you are feeling down trodden and treated no better than cattle by the government that's inslaved you😂
 
You don't have to go into a church to be a believer folks....just accept Jesus into your heart....😁

We are the peepo 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So…….

Did we go to t’moon or not? :laugh: 

I haven’t bothered with the last pages, I’ve been up a mountain. As per, it’s gone down the religious route and the same old. Where in the Bible does it say Aliens don’t exist and space travel is impossible? What it does say in both old and New Testaments is that the earth is the center of the universe and yet we know that’s bollocks, proven bollocks. Anyone want to tell me if (hypothetically) Aliens (intelligent ones) are proven real what that means for monotheism?

and ffs please please admit we went to the moon before you do :laugh: 

Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, mushroom said:

So…….

Did we go to t’moon or not? :laugh: 

I haven’t bothered with the last pages, I’ve been up a mountain. As per, it’s gone down the religious route and the same old. Where in the Bible does it say Aliens don’t exist and space travel is impossible? What it does say in both old and New Testaments is that the earth is the center of the universe and yet we know that’s bollocks, proven bollocks. Anyone want to tell me if (hypothetically) Aliens (intelligent ones) are proven real what that means for monotheism?

and ffs please please admit we went to the moon before you do :laugh: 

Trump has just said civil aviation has gone backwards because we could fly New York / London in a third of the time on Concord and wants to bring back supersonic civilian commercial flight. That is something I’d like, but I disagree about it going backwards, it moved forward to mass , affordable flights. 
Concorde was very expensive and carried 100 passengers, todays long haul is relatively cheap and carries 500 passengers.

It was political interference that ended supersonic commercial flight, governments banning sonic booms over land, but I hope it comes back and the Uk is at the forefront of the development.

Cheers.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
56 minutes ago, chartpolski said:

Trump has just said civil aviation has gone backwards because we could fly New York / London in a third of the time on Concord and wants to bring back supersonic civilian commercial flight. That is something I’d like, but I disagree about it going backwards, it moved forward to mass , affordable flights. 
Concorde was very expensive and carried 100 passengers, todays long haul is relatively cheap and carries 500 passengers.

It was political interference that ended supersonic commercial flight, governments banning sonic booms over land, but I hope it comes back and the Uk is at the forefront of the development.

Cheers.

chinese just trialing one twice as fast as concorde 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, chartpolski said:

Trump has just said civil aviation has gone backwards because we could fly New York / London in a third of the time on Concord and wants to bring back supersonic civilian commercial flight. That is something I’d like, but I disagree about it going backwards, it moved forward to mass , affordable flights. 
Concorde was very expensive and carried 100 passengers, todays long haul is relatively cheap and carries 500 passengers.

It was political interference that ended supersonic commercial flight, governments banning sonic booms over land, but I hope it comes back and the Uk is at the forefront of the development.

Cheers.

The fuel bill must’ve been huge though. Hence the price. But in fairness, surely the price back then for a seat was comparable to todays business class.

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, mushroom said:

The fuel bill must’ve been huge though. Hence the price. But in fairness, surely the price back then for a seat was comparable to todays business class.

Some of my colleagues would fly from Jeddah to Bahrain on our airline and then use our 50% concession tickets with BA to fly Concorde to LHR, and this was around £1,000 in the early 80’s, so full fare would be around £2.000 one way. You could get a slightly cheaper ticket as concessions were based on full fare not any special discounts. 
The cost of building, buying , maintaining Concord was huge and needed flight crews, ground crews and maintenance staff with specialist skills and even with outrageous ticket prices coupled with small payloads made it economically unviable.

Cheers.

Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, mC HULL said:

chinese just trialing one twice as fast as concorde 

It’s relatively easy to build a supersonic aircraft, but making it commercially and economically viable is extremely difficult. Plus countries by-laws regarding supersonic flight further hinder its use. 
Concords engines were basically the same Rolls Royce engines used in the Vulcan bomber, 1950’s technology with upgrades. 
It’s ok having the technology, but you need the airlines to buy and operate them, and they won’t if they aren’t profitable to run.

Cheers.

Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, mC HULL said:

chinese just trialing one twice as fast as concorde 

That new rocket engine technology they have successfully tested that will be able to reach speeds of up to Mach 6, imagine that on a passenger plane, almost 5000 mph, get me on those long haul flights. 

Edited by Pardus
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I think space planes will be the next ‘concord’. Once they figure out the engine tech to transition between atmospheric and exoatmospheric flight it really opens up huge potential. London to Sydney in an hour…

But also there’s a lot of research going into hypersonics now which will potentially advance air travel too.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, chartpolski said:

Some of my colleagues would fly from Jeddah to Bahrain on our airline and then use our 50% concession tickets with BA to fly Concorde to LHR, and this was around £1,000 in the early 80’s, so full fare would be around £2.000 one way. You could get a slightly cheaper ticket as concessions were based on full fare not any special discounts. 
The cost of building, buying , maintaining Concord was huge and needed flight crews, ground crews and maintenance staff with specialist skills and even with outrageous ticket prices coupled with small payloads made it economically unviable.

Cheers.

Agreed but the ticket price is comparable with todays biz class. The ground systems/staff/maintenance crew etc should’ve been factored in to make it viable, even if it put it on par with first class these days.

Kinell how much is one of those new suites on Emirates or Singapore nowadays? Around 10-20k depending the route no? I only have an idea on pricing ‘cause I like to watch those Avgeeks on YouTube :laugh: 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...