Francie, 2,804 Posted June 9 Report Share Posted June 9 27 minutes ago, Pardus said: Your justification won't wash with me, god is punishing women by rape if their husband does not obey, some God eh. Were did you pull that passage from because I just looked there an this is what the King James says Thou shalt betroth a wife, and another man shall lie with her: thou shalt build an house, and thou shalt not dwell therein: thou shalt plant a vineyard, and shalt not gather the grapes thereof. tbh I'm going to look at these other publications,I know the kj the verified translation,but I don't know about most of these other ones,there's alot I just seen,an I don't think I'd trust them Quote Link to post Share on other sites
shaaark 11,374 Posted June 9 Report Share Posted June 9 5 minutes ago, Daniel cain said: That mad cnut believes in Aliens Ordered it, had a very quick think, then had a word with myself and cancelled the order!! 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Francie, 2,804 Posted June 9 Report Share Posted June 9 23 minutes ago, Pardus said: Do you believe in the use of condoms or the pill? This is the last reply about God in this topic,start a another thread an we'll chat,I never have used condoms or pills Start another topic an we'll chat 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Pardus 1,610 Posted June 9 Report Share Posted June 9 16 minutes ago, Francie, said: This is the last reply about God in this topic,start a another thread an we'll chat,I never have used condoms or pills Start another topic an we'll chat A condom could have prevented this. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Pardus 1,610 Posted June 9 Report Share Posted June 9 5 hours ago, Francie, said: Were did you pull that passage from because I just looked there an this is what the King James says Thou shalt betroth a wife, and another man shall lie with her: thou shalt build an house, and thou shalt not dwell therein: thou shalt plant a vineyard, and shalt not gather the grapes thereof. tbh I'm going to look at these other publications,I know the kj the verified translation,but I don't know about most of these other ones,there's alot I just seen,an I don't think I'd trust them Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jackthelad 2,084 Posted June 9 Report Share Posted June 9 7 hours ago, Daniel cain said: There's plenty of evidence that's been proved through the Bible lads,if you take the time and have a read....then a lot of Today's madness going on in the world is explained/predicted ... How true is the paragraph below? Is there any evidence that the Bible is true? There is, for instance, physical evidence. We have copies of the manuscripts and throughout history these copies show that the Bible has been transmitted accurately. Despite common skeptical claims that the Bible has often been changed through the centuries, the physical evidence tells another story. I was a non believer myself for yrs,for my own personal reasons...but I picked it up and started reading it 4/5 yrs ago....and it started making sense,the people that govern us,don't want you having faith/beliefs, because they can't control you that's why religion is attacked from every angle...its become a dirty word...the mad thing is....those that have faith like the Jews, Catholics, Muslims are the ones thriving ,sticking together,looking after their own,while the rest of you are feeling down trodden and treated no better than cattle by the government that's inslaved you You don't have to go into a church to be a believer folks....just accept Jesus into your heart.... We are the peepo Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mushroom 14,052 Posted June 9 Report Share Posted June 9 So……. Did we go to t’moon or not? I haven’t bothered with the last pages, I’ve been up a mountain. As per, it’s gone down the religious route and the same old. Where in the Bible does it say Aliens don’t exist and space travel is impossible? What it does say in both old and New Testaments is that the earth is the center of the universe and yet we know that’s bollocks, proven bollocks. Anyone want to tell me if (hypothetically) Aliens (intelligent ones) are proven real what that means for monotheism? and ffs please please admit we went to the moon before you do Quote Link to post Share on other sites
chartpolski 27,739 Posted June 9 Report Share Posted June 9 42 minutes ago, mushroom said: So……. Did we go to t’moon or not? I haven’t bothered with the last pages, I’ve been up a mountain. As per, it’s gone down the religious route and the same old. Where in the Bible does it say Aliens don’t exist and space travel is impossible? What it does say in both old and New Testaments is that the earth is the center of the universe and yet we know that’s bollocks, proven bollocks. Anyone want to tell me if (hypothetically) Aliens (intelligent ones) are proven real what that means for monotheism? and ffs please please admit we went to the moon before you do Trump has just said civil aviation has gone backwards because we could fly New York / London in a third of the time on Concord and wants to bring back supersonic civilian commercial flight. That is something I’d like, but I disagree about it going backwards, it moved forward to mass , affordable flights. Concorde was very expensive and carried 100 passengers, todays long haul is relatively cheap and carries 500 passengers. It was political interference that ended supersonic commercial flight, governments banning sonic booms over land, but I hope it comes back and the Uk is at the forefront of the development. Cheers. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mC HULL 15,745 Posted June 9 Report Share Posted June 9 56 minutes ago, chartpolski said: Trump has just said civil aviation has gone backwards because we could fly New York / London in a third of the time on Concord and wants to bring back supersonic civilian commercial flight. That is something I’d like, but I disagree about it going backwards, it moved forward to mass , affordable flights. Concorde was very expensive and carried 100 passengers, todays long haul is relatively cheap and carries 500 passengers. It was political interference that ended supersonic commercial flight, governments banning sonic booms over land, but I hope it comes back and the Uk is at the forefront of the development. Cheers. chinese just trialing one twice as fast as concorde Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mushroom 14,052 Posted June 9 Report Share Posted June 9 1 hour ago, chartpolski said: Trump has just said civil aviation has gone backwards because we could fly New York / London in a third of the time on Concord and wants to bring back supersonic civilian commercial flight. That is something I’d like, but I disagree about it going backwards, it moved forward to mass , affordable flights. Concorde was very expensive and carried 100 passengers, todays long haul is relatively cheap and carries 500 passengers. It was political interference that ended supersonic commercial flight, governments banning sonic booms over land, but I hope it comes back and the Uk is at the forefront of the development. Cheers. The fuel bill must’ve been huge though. Hence the price. But in fairness, surely the price back then for a seat was comparable to todays business class. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
chartpolski 27,739 Posted June 9 Report Share Posted June 9 3 minutes ago, mushroom said: The fuel bill must’ve been huge though. Hence the price. But in fairness, surely the price back then for a seat was comparable to todays business class. Some of my colleagues would fly from Jeddah to Bahrain on our airline and then use our 50% concession tickets with BA to fly Concorde to LHR, and this was around £1,000 in the early 80’s, so full fare would be around £2.000 one way. You could get a slightly cheaper ticket as concessions were based on full fare not any special discounts. The cost of building, buying , maintaining Concord was huge and needed flight crews, ground crews and maintenance staff with specialist skills and even with outrageous ticket prices coupled with small payloads made it economically unviable. Cheers. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
chartpolski 27,739 Posted June 9 Report Share Posted June 9 18 minutes ago, mC HULL said: chinese just trialing one twice as fast as concorde It’s relatively easy to build a supersonic aircraft, but making it commercially and economically viable is extremely difficult. Plus countries by-laws regarding supersonic flight further hinder its use. Concords engines were basically the same Rolls Royce engines used in the Vulcan bomber, 1950’s technology with upgrades. It’s ok having the technology, but you need the airlines to buy and operate them, and they won’t if they aren’t profitable to run. Cheers. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Pardus 1,610 Posted June 9 Report Share Posted June 9 (edited) 33 minutes ago, mC HULL said: chinese just trialing one twice as fast as concorde That new rocket engine technology they have successfully tested that will be able to reach speeds of up to Mach 6, imagine that on a passenger plane, almost 5000 mph, get me on those long haul flights. Edited June 9 by Pardus 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Born Hunter 17,909 Posted June 9 Report Share Posted June 9 I think space planes will be the next ‘concord’. Once they figure out the engine tech to transition between atmospheric and exoatmospheric flight it really opens up huge potential. London to Sydney in an hour… But also there’s a lot of research going into hypersonics now which will potentially advance air travel too. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mushroom 14,052 Posted June 9 Report Share Posted June 9 19 minutes ago, chartpolski said: Some of my colleagues would fly from Jeddah to Bahrain on our airline and then use our 50% concession tickets with BA to fly Concorde to LHR, and this was around £1,000 in the early 80’s, so full fare would be around £2.000 one way. You could get a slightly cheaper ticket as concessions were based on full fare not any special discounts. The cost of building, buying , maintaining Concord was huge and needed flight crews, ground crews and maintenance staff with specialist skills and even with outrageous ticket prices coupled with small payloads made it economically unviable. Cheers. Agreed but the ticket price is comparable with todays biz class. The ground systems/staff/maintenance crew etc should’ve been factored in to make it viable, even if it put it on par with first class these days. Kinell how much is one of those new suites on Emirates or Singapore nowadays? Around 10-20k depending the route no? I only have an idea on pricing ‘cause I like to watch those Avgeeks on YouTube Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.