Jump to content

Recommended Posts


  • Replies 1.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Mate ,a few yrs back...you was sat behind the settee,peaking out the patio door...to scared to go out and pick your dogshit up lol,THL's very own shithouse...🤣that speaks volumes,on the sort of person

What like covid? Haha haha

Anyhow, it’s not evolution , but I’ve got a call duck to hatch a brood of Irish Gamefowl;  Well, it could be something to do with evolution, ducks and chickens probably have a common avian

Posted Images

16 minutes ago, Born Hunter said:

It’s not my theory, it’s a combination of work from Edwin Hubbles astronomical observations, Friedman’s ideas, Einsteins theoretical work, and several others in the field. But in essence the observable universe is expanding. Therefore logically if we wind back time everything was at a single point (a singularity). The consequences of the entire universe being in a singularity is a complete breakdown of known physics to such a degree that no one has a f***ing scooby what came before that if even anything did. There’s heaps of ‘ideas’ mostly revolving around multiverse hypotheses but they’re pretty much unprovable with our current understanding of physics. The Big Bang theory is testable, what if anything came before is currently not.

To be absolutely clear, the Big Bang theory doesn’t say how energy and time came into existence, just that several billion years ago it was all in a singularity and has been expanding ever since. It’s really that simple.

The big bang is a creationists best friend, it literally opened science up to the existence of god/s where before steady state theory left no room for the divine.

When you put it like that, it becomes much easier to understand it all.  😗

Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, Born Hunter said:

It’s not my theory, it’s a combination of work from Edwin Hubbles astronomical observations, Friedman’s ideas, Einsteins theoretical work, and several others in the field. But in essence the observable universe is expanding. Therefore logically if we wind back time everything was at a single point (a singularity). The consequences of the entire universe being in a singularity is a complete breakdown of known physics to such a degree that no one has a f***ing scooby what came before that if even anything did. There’s heaps of ‘ideas’ mostly revolving around multiverse hypotheses but they’re pretty much unprovable with our current understanding of physics. The Big Bang theory is testable, what if anything came before is currently not.

To be absolutely clear, the Big Bang theory doesn’t say how energy and time came into existence, just that several billion years ago it was all in a singularity and has been expanding ever since. It’s really that simple.

The big bang is a creationists best friend, it literally opened science up to the existence of god/s where before steady state theory left no room for the divine.

Interesting mate all a big head f**k in the grand scheme of things. 
 

history and creation is all good to look back on and so on etc … but reality is we can only control the future for ourselves. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, shaaark said:

When you put it like that, it becomes much easier to understand it all.  😗

It is if you are willing to accept we know nothing ;)  

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, scotty12 said:

Don’t seem like it mate…. You failed the common sense test miserably 

If that test is that I completely and comprehensively rejected your conspiracy theories, none of which I may add have come true ; the stock markets haven’t crashed, the gold standard hasn’t returned, BRICS hasn’t taken over money transfers, the “White Hats” whoever they are, haven’t taken over the world, we haven’t got conscription and any other mad conspiracy theory you have come up with hasn’t happened.

You keep telling us all this is imminent, but you keep moving the date when  it’s going to happen !

I’ve lived for many years  in the real world , been places , done things and seen things you couldn’t understand mate. Don’t try to mug me off with your nonsense 

Lets not fall out over this, it’s not my style.

Cheers.

  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, chartpolski said:

If that test is that I completely and comprehensively rejected your conspiracy theories, none of which I may add have come true ; the stock markets haven’t crashed, the gold standard hasn’t returned, BRICS hasn’t taken over money transfers, the “White Hats” whoever they are, haven’t taken over the world, we haven’t got conscription and any other mad conspiracy theory you have come up with hasn’t happened.

You keep telling us all this is imminent, but you keep moving the date when  it’s going to happen !

I’ve lived for many years  in the real world , been places , done things and seen things you couldn’t understand mate. Don’t try to mug me off with your nonsense 

Lets not fall out over this, it’s not my style.

Cheers.

I knew that would be easy with that bourbon  and coke inside ya hahahahha 

 

 

enjoy the rest of your night my old China 

Link to post
Share on other sites

And full fat milk isn't really better for you as it contains more saturated fat, don't listen to Eddie Abbew and the old "Semi-skimmed milk is just sugar water!" 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, scotty12 said:

I knew that would be easy with that bourbon  and coke inside ya hahahahha 

 

 

enjoy the rest of your night my old China 

Just catching up on Zia suddenly rejoining Reform . My in boxes are full and I need to reply, but Nigel isn’t returning my calls, he must be busy but the f****r better reply or my support may be in jeopardy ! LOL 

Cheers.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Pardus said:

And full fat milk isn't really better for you as it contains more saturated fat, don't listen to Eddie Abbew and the old "Semi-skimmed milk is just sugar water!" 

Full fat milk IS DEFINITELY  better for you than skimmed or semi skimmed milk.

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, shaaark said:

Full fat milk IS DEFINITELY  better for you than skimmed or semi skimmed milk.

Wrong, excess saturated fat is NOT good for you, whole milk contains double the amount of saturated fat.

Edited by Pardus
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Pardus said:

Wrong, excess saturated fat is NOT good for you, whole milk contains double the amount of saturated fat.

It's good for you, whether you choose to believe it or not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...