chartpolski 27,865 Posted June 7 Report Share Posted June 7 (edited) 5 minutes ago, mushroom said: Also attempts to include Quantum and/or string depending the mathematician/discipline And let’s not start on the dark side I was talking basics. I remember buying Hawkins book Brief History of Time, and struggled with some of it. Then he brought out An Illustrated Breif History of Time for dullards like me so I got that. All I learned was I bought two books to not understand the same things ! LOL ! Cheers. Edited June 7 by chartpolski 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
chartpolski 27,865 Posted June 7 Report Share Posted June 7 Anyhow, it’s not evolution , but I’ve got a call duck to hatch a brood of Irish Gamefowl; Well, it could be something to do with evolution, ducks and chickens probably have a common avian ancestor….. Cheers. 7 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mushroom 14,063 Posted June 7 Report Share Posted June 7 (edited) 17 minutes ago, Pardus said: You stated that Dark Matter was causing the rapid expansion of the Universe, that isn't doing that, that is Dark Energy. I didn't need Google to spot your glaring error. Go back to Google or would you like me to do a search and post a link? And I wasn’t totally clear and correct on one thing… let’s see if you can spot it. Edited June 7 by mushroom Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Pardus 1,610 Posted June 7 Report Share Posted June 7 1 minute ago, mushroom said: Go back to Google or would you like me to do a search and post a link? I think you should fella, did you or did you not state that Dark Matter is causing the Universe to expand? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
gunter 1,583 Posted June 7 Report Share Posted June 7 7 minutes ago, chartpolski said: Anyhow, it’s not evolution , but I’ve got a call duck to hatch a brood of Irish Gamefowl; Well, it could be something to do with evolution, ducks and chickens probably have a common avian ancestor….. Cheers. Nice good duck lol Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Pardus 1,610 Posted June 7 Report Share Posted June 7 From Quora: Quantum physics often appears to "violate" the classical rules of physics because it operates under a different set of principles that govern the behavior of particles at extremely small scales. Here are some key differences and reasons why quantum physics seems to defy classical intuition: 1. Superposition In quantum mechanics, particles can exist in multiple states at once (superposition) until they are measured. This contrasts with classical physics, where objects have definite properties (like position and velocity) at any given time. 2. Entanglement Quantum entanglement allows particles to be correlated in ways that classical physics cannot explain. Changes to one entangled particle can instantaneously affect another, regardless of the distance separating them, violating classical notions of locality. 3. Uncertainty Principle Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle states that certain pairs of properties (like position and momentum) cannot be simultaneously known to arbitrary precision. This challenges classical determinism, where such quantities can be precisely measured. 4. Wave-Particle Duality Particles such as electrons exhibit both wave-like and particle-like properties, depending on how they are observed. Classical physics treats objects as either particles or waves, not both simultaneously. 5. Probability and Measurement Quantum mechanics relies heavily on probability and statistical outcomes rather than deterministic predictions. The results of quantum experiments can often only be predicted in terms of probabilities, a significant departure from classical physics. 6. Nonlocality Quantum mechanics allows for nonlocal interactions, where a change in one part of a system can instantaneously affect another part, regardless of distance. This contradicts classical concepts of space and time. Summary While quantum physics may seem to violate classical rules, it does not actually break them; rather, it extends and redefines our understanding of physical laws at microscopic scales. Classical physics is still valid and effective for macroscopic phenomena, where quantum effects average out and become negligible. Quantum mechanics and classical mechanics coexist, each applicable in their respective domains. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mushroom 14,063 Posted June 7 Report Share Posted June 7 1 minute ago, Pardus said: I think you should fella, did you or did you not state that Dark Matter is causing the Universe to expand? “Hypothetical dark matter is believed to exist based on observed gravitational effects that cannot be explained” I’ll concede that I wasn’t clear. Dark energy and dark mass are both contradicting theories to the laws of physics as we know them without being proven to exist and both are responsible for the structure and expansion of the universe. Will that do you? Transpose E=MC2 to show C. let’s see if your GPT can give you that answer Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Pardus 1,610 Posted June 7 Report Share Posted June 7 4 minutes ago, mushroom said: “Hypothetical dark matter is believed to exist based on observed gravitational effects that cannot be explained” I’ll concede that I wasn’t clear. Dark energy and dark mass are both contradicting theories to the laws of physics as we know them without being proven to exist and both are responsible for the structure and expansion of the universe. Will that do you? Transpose E=MC2 to show C. let’s see if your GPT can give you that answer Lovely copy and paste mate, so, it looks like Google and books are both our friends. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mushroom 14,063 Posted June 7 Report Share Posted June 7 22 minutes ago, Pardus said: Lovely copy and paste mate, so, it looks like Google and books are both our friends. I just did that for you and I said it before I did it. That’s a snippet from Harvard astrophysics The difference is, I don’t need to rely on these tools to have a discussion that I’m versed in. If I don’t know, I ask those who do or stay quiet and do my own research and not come back acting like I know all. You should try a bit of that philosophy. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Pardus 1,610 Posted June 7 Report Share Posted June 7 10 minutes ago, mushroom said: I just did that for you and I said it before I did it. That’s a snippet from Harvard astrophysics The difference is, I don’t need to rely on these tools to have a discussion that I’m versed in. If I don’t know, I ask those who do or stay quiet and do my own research and not come back acting like I know all. You should try a bit of that philosophy. Discussions that you're well versed in, come on mate try another. You know as much about quantum physics as I do about hair dressing. I do plenty of research and that's one of my advantages, I won't just type anything without researching first, but come on, everyone knows that Dark Energy is behind the rapid expansion of the Universe, next time more research is needed. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mushroom 14,063 Posted June 7 Report Share Posted June 7 31 minutes ago, Pardus said: Discussions that you're well versed in, come on mate try another. You know as much about quantum physics as I do about hair dressing. I do plenty of research and that's one of my advantages, I won't just type anything without researching first, but come on, everyone knows that Dark Energy is behind the rapid expansion of the Universe, next time more research is needed. I’d say if you’d been to hairdresser school like I went to uni and got my bachelors in maths then yeah you’d know more about cutting hair than me. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mushroom 14,063 Posted June 7 Report Share Posted June 7 And copying and pasting is a far cry from understanding how to do a bowl cut Quote Link to post Share on other sites
shaaark 11,392 Posted June 7 Report Share Posted June 7 Some of you lads are wasting your lives on here, and working at the jobs you do. If I were you, I'd be sending speculative cv's etc to elon musk, and all these space labs etc etc!! Faaackin el!! 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Francie, 2,809 Posted June 7 Report Share Posted June 7 1 hour ago, Pardus said: The Origin of Whales and the Power of Independent Evidence | National Center for Science Education NCSE.NGO How do you convince a creationist that a fossil is a transitional fossil? Give up? It is a trick question. You cannot do it... 2 hours ago, Pardus said: The Origin of Whales and the Power of Independent Evidence | National Center for Science Education NCSE.NGO How do you convince a creationist that a fossil is a transitional fossil? Give up? It is a trick question. You cannot do it... The first example of transitional animal is the mesonycid,it was not an aquatic animal at all. Next is the pakicetus of which they've only found a bit of skull an a supposed ankle bone,nothing else,but speculate it was a transitional animal to Whales lol But they've only found a bit of skull an a ankle bone,probably not even of the same animal. I'm afraid the author of this piece is just putting animals together from supposed 50 million years ago an more,iv readthe whole thing an it's not very convincing mate,just speculation an assumptions,not scientific at all Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mushroom 14,063 Posted June 7 Report Share Posted June 7 1 minute ago, shaaark said: Some of you lads are wasting your lives on here, and working at the jobs you do. If I were you, I'd be sending speculative cv's etc to elon musk, and all these space labs etc etc!! Faaackin el!! I’m on the beach mate with the mrs lol 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.