More pentagon confirmed UFO,s ??

[chartpolski 27,861]

Isn't "carbon dating" used more as a generic term these days for all element type dating ?

Other elements such as uranium-thorite are supposed to be more accurate and have longer half-life's.

Studies of cave paintings date some of them as far back as 60,000 years.

Interesting subject.

Cheers.

[Greb147 6,810]

Just now, chartpolski said:

Isn't "carbon dating" used more as a generic term these days for all element type dating ?

Other elements such as uranium-thorite are supposed to be more accurate and have longer half-life's.

Studies of cave paintings date some of them as far back as 60,000 years.

Interesting subject.

Cheers.

Probably, but like you said different elements are used depending on the time frame and material. 

[Francie 6,368]

1 minute ago, Greb147 said:

It can be measured past 20,000 years lad, it works on objects up to about 50,000 years old. 

When you go past that time frame they use other methods. 

No it doesn't greb,it been revised many a time over the years an now there saying its twenty thousand years,because there's no absolute determination on it,c14 has a half life of 7000 odd years,so they say,so it's impossible to measure past certain amount of years. 

But even if it was upto 50,000 years that still not long enough for evoloution.

Bearing in mind carbon dating is for organic material,living things 

When you say they use different methods for older things that don't include organic matter,or humans animals,because there not measuring carbon there measuring potassium to argon,therefore it's no good for measuring life.

[Squirrel_Basher 17,102]

So dinosaurs never existed then Francie or came after man .

[Greb147 6,810]

1 minute ago, Francie said:

No it doesn't greb,it been revised many a time over the years an now there saying its twenty thousand years,because there's no absolute determination on it,c14 has a half life of 7000 odd years,so they say,so it's impossible to measure past certain amount of years. 

But even if it was upto 50,000 years that still not long enough for evoloution.

Bearing in mind carbon dating is for organic material,living things 

When you say they use different methods for older things that don't include organic matter,or humans animals,because there not measuring carbon there measuring potassium to argon,therefore it's no good for measuring life.

You are wrong yet again Francie lad, yes it's true that carbon dating techniques get recalibrated, so what? It has never been accurate to the year or thousandth year in some cases. 

What has carbon dating got to do with evolution even though you're wrong on that as well. 

I told you they don't measure carbon on rocks. 

[Francie 6,368]

1 minute ago, foxdropper said:

So dinosaurs never existed then Francie or came after man .

Aye of course they did,a croc is a dinosaur,a dinosaur is another animal,there in the good book a few times fd

[Chid 6,787]

15 minutes ago, foxdropper said:

How do dinosaurs fit in with the good book Francie .

And God created great whales, and every living creature that moveth, which the waters brought forth abundantly, after their kind, and every winged fowl after his kind: and God saw that it was good

[Greb147 6,810]

Just now, Francie said:

Aye of course they did,a croc is a dinosaur,a dinosaur is another animal,there in the good book a few times fd

Nice cop out, what about the giant reptilians that walked the land for millions of years? 

 

[chartpolski 27,861]

Any thoughts on the Ishtar Gate in Babylon ?

Around 3,000 years old it depicts a series of animals, some still with us, such as lions; some now extinct, such as aurochs; and, weirdly, some that can only be described as dragons or dinosaurs ! How did ancient Mesopotamia know about dinosaurs ?

Cheers.

[Francie 6,368]

Just now, Greb147 said:

You are wrong yet again Francie lad, yes it's true that carbon dating techniques get recalibrated, so what? It has never been accurate to the year or thousandth year in some cases. 

What has carbon dating got to do with evolution even though you're wrong on that as well. 

I told you they don't measure carbon on rocks. 

Yes I know they don't use carbon,that's my point,as charts says it was used as generic Term. 

 

[Squirrel_Basher 17,102]

So in the scheme of creation what were his time scales .Dinosaurs before man or man before dinos or all created at same time just to avoid confusion .

 

[kanny 21,650]

Seems a fitting place ,cue the moon landing conspiracies......

Michael Collins: Apollo 11 moon landing astronaut dies aged 90

NEWS.SKY.COM

---

Collins never expressed regret at not being able to walk on the moon and said he was...

 

[Greb147 6,810]

2 minutes ago, Francie said:

Yes I know they don't use carbon,that's my point,as charts says it was used as generic Term. 

 

But it is used for certain objects up to a certain point. 

Either way, carbon dating shows that humans are much older than 6000 years old. 

[Chid 6,787]

2 minutes ago, foxdropper said:

So in the scheme of creation what were his time scales .Dinosaurs before man or man before dinos or all created at same time just to avoid confusion .

 

Dinosaur came before man according to the Bible imo 

[Squirrel_Basher 17,102]

Can you quote that chid and if so how did dominion over all animals work back then .Was it man that caused dinos to become extinct .