The Betrayed Girls Bbc1 Now.

[tatsblisters 10,956]

I am gobsmacked that anyone can compare 360 alleged 'abuse victims' of the MOD to a racial and religiously motivated and targeted attacked on hundreds of thousands of girls over 20+ year years.

 

I hope those few people on this forum that keep trolling normal people get a taste of diversity one day....you know who you are and you are sick in the head

Rotherham is full of these types the CSE deniers the same people who coverd it up in Rotherham for years and that Andrew Norfolk who did the story of the wide spread abuse by mainly Pakistani grooming gangs only did so imho because the right wing was growing amongst ordinary folk who were not being listend to.

[Nik_B 3,791]

 

I am gobsmacked that anyone can compare 360 alleged 'abuse victims' of the MOD to a racial and religiously motivated and targeted attacked on hundreds of thousands of girls over 20+ year years.

 

I hope those few people on this forum that keep trolling normal people get a taste of diversity one day....you know who you are and you are sick in the head

Rotherham is full of these types the CSE deniers the same people who coverd it up in Rotherham for years and that Andrew Norfolk who did the story of the wide spread abuse by mainly Pakistani grooming gangs only did so imho because the right wing was growing amongst ordinary folk who were not being listend to.

 

 

I think Tommy Robinson said that Rotherham was a smokescreen/diversion as the number of sexually active muslim males was very low (around 3000)...it makes you wonder about Luton, bradford etc

[tilimangro 1,013]

I am gobsmacked that anyone can compare 360 alleged 'abuse victims' of the MOD to a racial and religiously motivated and targeted attacked on hundreds of thousands of girls over 20+ years.

 

I hope those few people on this forum that keep trolling normal people get a taste of diversity one day....you know who you are and you are sick in the head

Ah yeah but it can't be because the victims aren't muslims can it

That wouldn't be right

This only came to light after Sikhs were complaining their girls were being trafficked

Not a single Muslim victim out of thousands and thousands

But no nothing to do with ideology

[ChrisJones 7,975]

I am gobsmacked that anyone can compare 360 alleged 'abuse victims' of the MOD to a racial and religiously motivated and targeted attacked on hundreds of thousands of girls over 20+ years.

 

I hope those few people on this forum that keep trolling normal people get a taste of diversity one day....you know who you are and you are sick in the head

 

MOD pays £2m in out of court settlements to victims of sexual abuse. One girl who had been repeatedly abused was awarded £210,000 after giving birth to her abuser's child. Alleged?

 

This isn't to detract from the horrors suffered at the hands of these grooming gangs. This isn't a case of trolling, or a case of a wind-up. This is to show that sexual abuse of children isn't limited to one demographic as much as some people would like it to be.

 

Be consistent at least. If you're going to hang paedos hang all of them not just the brown ones.

Edited July 15, 2017 by ChrisJones

[Accip74 7,112]

 

I am gobsmacked that anyone can compare 360 alleged 'abuse victims' of the MOD to a racial and religiously motivated and targeted attacked on hundreds of thousands of girls over 20+ years.

 

I hope those few people on this forum that keep trolling normal people get a taste of diversity one day....you know who you are and you are sick in the head

 

MOD pays £2m in out of court settlements to victims of sexual abuse. One girl who had been repeatedly abused was awarded £210,000 after giving birth to her abuser's child. Alleged?

 

This isn't to detract from the horrors suffered at the hands of these grooming gangs. This isn't a case of trolling, or a case of a wind-up. This is to show that sexual abuse of children isn't limited to one demographic as much as some people would like it to be.

 

Be consistent at least. If you're going to hang paedos hang all of them not just the brown ones.

You're sick chris!!

[tilimangro 1,013]

 

I am gobsmacked that anyone can compare 360 alleged 'abuse victims' of the MOD to a racial and religiously motivated and targeted attacked on hundreds of thousands of girls over 20+ years.

 

I hope those few people on this forum that keep trolling normal people get a taste of diversity one day....you know who you are and you are sick in the head

MOD pays £2m in out of court settlements to victims of sexual abuse. One girl who had been repeatedly abused was awarded £210,000 after giving birth to her abuser's child. Alleged?

 

This isn't to detract from the horrors suffered at the hands of these grooming gangs. This isn't a case of trolling, or a case of a wind-up. This is to show that sexual abuse of children isn't limited to one demographic as much as some people would like it to be.

 

Be consistent at least. If you're going to hang paedos hang all of them not just the brown ones.

could you point out where anyone has said we shouldn't investigate/hang white paedos

Or that we should only investigate brown skinned paedos

However given that Rotherham on its own involved 1400 girls

Oxford has been totally hushed up but is estimated to be the same number

And if you have evidence that grooming gangs operates in those two cities unhindered it probably follows other cities have the same issue also hushed up

Again

Please point out where we have specifically said only Muslim crimes should be investigates or that whte paedos should be free to do as they wish

[neems 2,406]

I agree with that. The ones that are still unpunished are better suited to hiding through status, or wealth. What we're seeing, prosecuted, is the low hanging fruit.

 

Any aspect of society that thinks it's okay to abuse underage kids are paedos by definition. Personally I don't think it's two seperate problems, but opposite sides of the same coin. You've got that way of thinking but you're in a part of society that doesn't necessarily see it for what it is.

 

When I say in the true sense of the word I mean most of the victims of the groomers weren't pre-pubescent children,that's what a paedophile's attracted to.

 

2 different animals imo,the Pakis are just dirty rats with a whole community (as well as MP's,councillors,social workers and police) supporting them,I think real paedophiles are born that way and the most dangerous ones like Saville spend a long time putting themselves in positions where they can get away with it.

[mackem 29,577]

 

 

,the Pakis are just dirty rats with a whole community (as well as MP's,councillors,social workers and police) supporting them

 

Pakistan grooming gangs,pedo-packs or whatever its endemically cultural.

[ChrisJones 7,975]

could you point out where anyone has said we shouldn't investigate/hang white paedos

Or that we should only investigate brown skinned paedos

However given that Rotherham on its own involved 1400 girls

Oxford has been totally hushed up but is estimated to be the same number

And if you have evidence that grooming gangs operates in those two cities unhindered it probably follows other cities have the same issue also hushed up

Again

Please point out where we have specifically said only Muslim crimes should be investigates or that whte paedos should be free to do as they wish

Mate, I've just been called out for being a troll for highlighting another high profile abuse case that's now breaking. Sick in the head for daring to suggest that this new case is somehow not worthy of mentioning in light of the crimes committed in Rotherham. Even the quotes around 'abuse victims' had a condescending tone like criticism of the MOD is somehow a taboo subject, as is the end results are almost trivial. The choice of wording suggested that I had 'made shit up' in order to further some kind of agenda!

 

My mistake it appears but I assumed universal disgust for paedophiles was the subject the thread had shifted towards.

 

I cannot answer any of your above questions, as I don't know of any occasion where anyone has said that but the focus is purely on the perpetrators and never falls on the people that have covered it up. Where is the outrage at the local authority for not acting? The police for not acting? The home office for not acting? The people that have been convicted of these crimes, many of them are back out on the streets. The girls are still shunned by the LA and the authorities, and we all know that this is just the tip of the iceberg. For all this outrage nothing has changed...

 

When I say in the true sense of the word I mean most of the victims of the groomers weren't pre-pubescent children,that's what a paedophile's attracted to.

 

2 different animals imo,the Pakis are just dirty rats with a whole community (as well as MP's,councillors,social workers and police) supporting them,I think real paedophiles are born that way and the most dangerous ones like Saville spend a long time putting themselves in positions where they can get away with it.

 

Again I agree. The victims are vulnerable kids. That is the common denominator for the highly at risk. That warrants serious focus to tackle the likes of those that hide in positions of power. I'm certainly not going to split heirs over the ages of what constitutes underage kids.

 

All the white men in here will probably agree with that

 

I bet the brown ones do too.

Edited July 15, 2017 by ChrisJones

[tilimangro 1,013]

No offence i generally like and agree with a lot of what you have to say

But on a thread specifically about Pakistani grooming gangs you start on about how whites are paedos too

We know that

And I agree with where's the backlash at those who covered up etc

But more importantly let's not bury our heads in the sand

These gangs are still operating and targeting non Muslim children

So why keep going on about white paedos and mod in a thread specifically about Muslim grooming gangs

And the numbers are staggering

I don't think you're a troll

I think you chose the wrong place and moment to be pc

It's time to take the blinkers off

[ChrisJones 7,975]

I appreciate the sentiments, sir, but I respectfully disagree with some of your post.

 

If the OP started a thread on pancreatic cancer, and someone mentioned prostate cancer, he wouldn't be vilified for it. This is what we're dealing with, a form of cancer. We're dealing with the lowest of the low. None of these f***ing lowlives are beneath exposure and you're dead wrong about being PC. A paedo, is a paedo, is a f***ing paedo and none of them deserve a special category.

 

Again silly me. I didn't realise we were exclusively muslim bashing again, I'll get my coat...

[C556 351]

This is maybe not the best thread to bring some humour, but on the subject of Muslims, this made me laugh:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dvASqu1DOjo&feature=youtu.be

[tilimangro 1,013]

I appreciate the sentiments, sir, but I respectfully disagree with some of your post.

 

If the OP started a thread on pancreatic cancer, and someone mentioned prostate cancer, he wouldn't be vilified for it. This is what we're dealing with, a form of cancer. We're dealing with the lowest of the low. None of these f***ing lowlives are beneath exposure and you're dead wrong about being PC. A paedo, is a paedo, is a f***ing paedo and none of them deserve a special category.

 

Again silly me. I didn't realise we were exclusively muslim bashing again, I'll get my coat...

again it's a thread discussing the issue of Muslim grooming gangs

You then say

Ah but it's nots just muslims

No but that's the issue we are discussing

Yeah but what about these other issues

No we're discussing this issue

Ah yeah but I'd like it derail this thread

Fwiw I think you're out of order to describe this as Muslim bashing

At worst it's Muslim paedofole grooming gang bashing which is an issue but if you continue to make light of that I shall be forced to rethink my opinion of you(whatever .i get it)

Just to reiterate it's a discussion about Muslim grooming gangs

These are valid concerns given the huge disparity in numbers

You're right about those in charge being bought to task

You're wrong to up white paedos and claim disparity in a discussion about Muslim grooming gangs

You're wrong to describe this as Muslim bashing

Given the facts

[neems 2,406]

 

 

 

When I say in the true sense of the word I mean most of the victims of the groomers weren't pre-pubescent children,that's what a paedophile's attracted to.

 

2 different animals imo,the Pakis are just dirty rats with a whole community (as well as MP's,councillors,social workers and police) supporting them,I think real paedophiles are born that way and the most dangerous ones like Saville spend a long time putting themselves in positions where they can get away with it.

 

Again I agree. The victims are vulnerable kids. That is the common denominator for the highly at risk. That warrants serious focus to tackle the likes of those that hide in positions of power. I'm certainly not going to split heirs over the ages of what constitutes underage kids.

 

 

I'm not saying ones worse than the other,just clearly council estate Pakis grooming teenagers and being protected by the state and their community are not the same as majority indigenous people who've worked their way into powerful positions to abuse kids.

 

I think the motivations are different and they can be dealt with differently.

 

i could be miles away,luckily I've never had any dealings with either group.

[ChrisJones 7,975]

Ah yeah but I'd like it derail this thread

.

Wasn't the intention but point taken. Have at it...

Edited July 16, 2017 by ChrisJones