Blackbriar 8,568 Posted June 16, 2016 Report Share Posted June 16, 2016 After a long and very public investigation, all charges against Cliff Richard have been dropped. He is obviously delighted to have defended his reputation. http://news.sky.com/story/1712785/cliff-richard-no-charges-over-sex-abuse-claims The late Clement Freud, however, is not in a position to defend his reputation, but allegations against him seem to already have been accepted as true..... http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3643513/Third-victim-Sir-Clement-Freud-comes-forward-allege-raped-calls-knighthood-revoked.html Double standards ? 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
tatsblisters 8,050 Posted June 16, 2016 Report Share Posted June 16, 2016 South Yorkshire police though in the case of Cliff Richards a force that's not known for its integraty. 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
TOMO 24,953 Posted June 16, 2016 Report Share Posted June 16, 2016 Yeh wait till he's dead,,,,they will all come out the woodwork... 6 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Brewman 1,190 Posted June 16, 2016 Report Share Posted June 16, 2016 I wholeheartedly agree with the decision. Innocent till proven guilty....... Hmmmmmm.(Sarcasm) Quote Link to post Share on other sites
The one 8,400 Posted June 16, 2016 Report Share Posted June 16, 2016 New balls please sue 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Blackbriar 8,568 Posted June 16, 2016 Author Report Share Posted June 16, 2016 I wholeheartedly agree with the decision. Innocent till proven guilty....... Hmmmmmm.(Sarcasm) No need for sarcasm BM......no evidence = no charges. Does that principle apply to Clement Freud..? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Onlyworkmatters 1,584 Posted June 16, 2016 Report Share Posted June 16, 2016 I wholeheartedly agree with the decision. Innocent till proven guilty....... Hmmmmmm.(Sarcasm) No need for sarcasm BM......no evidence = no charges. Does that principle apply to Clement Freud..? They havent said no evidence just not enough to press charges 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Blackbriar 8,568 Posted June 16, 2016 Author Report Share Posted June 16, 2016 I wholeheartedly agree with the decision. Innocent till proven guilty....... Hmmmmmm.(Sarcasm) No need for sarcasm BM......no evidence = no charges. Does that principle apply to Clement Freud..? They havent said no evidence just not enough to press charges So why are his old party condemning him, and his widow apologising ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Accip74 7,112 Posted June 16, 2016 Report Share Posted June 16, 2016 I wholeheartedly agree with the decision. Innocent till proven guilty....... Hmmmmmm.(Sarcasm) No need for sarcasm BM......no evidence = no charges. Does that principle apply to Clement Freud..? They havent said no evidence just not enough to press charges So why are his old party condemning him, and his widow apologising ? I think he meant cliff richard mate.........insufficient evidence, the cps let guilty people go every day on those grounds & innocent people of course.... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Onlyworkmatters 1,584 Posted June 16, 2016 Report Share Posted June 16, 2016 I wholeheartedly agree with the decision. Innocent till proven guilty....... Hmmmmmm.(Sarcasm) No need for sarcasm BM......no evidence = no charges. Does that principle apply to Clement Freud..? They havent said no evidence just not enough to press charges So why are his old party condemning him, and his widow apologising ? Sorry mate as Accip posted I ment Cliff 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Blackbriar 8,568 Posted June 17, 2016 Author Report Share Posted June 17, 2016 Cliff Richard will have to endure a whispering campaign for the rest of his life, while Clement Freud's reputation is in tatters.....but neither has had any proof levelled against them. This also happened to Freddie Starr, Paul Gambaccini, John Leslie, Matthew Kelly, Neil Fox and Lord Leon Brittan....... Victims and alleged victims receive anonymity, so why don't alleged perpetrators, unless and until they are at least charged ? 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
cragman 2,643 Posted June 17, 2016 Report Share Posted June 17, 2016 Gutted about this as his calendar in my mother-in-laws house was due to be ceremoniously ripped down and burnt once he'd been sent down!? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
tb25 4,626 Posted June 17, 2016 Report Share Posted June 17, 2016 I agree with tomo Quote Link to post Share on other sites
bracken boy 584 Posted June 17, 2016 Report Share Posted June 17, 2016 There's a lot of bollox being chucked about, Quote Link to post Share on other sites
secretagentmole 1,701 Posted June 18, 2016 Report Share Posted June 18, 2016 There's a lot of bollox being chucked about, How do you think these allegations got started in the first place? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.