Dogs siezed help

[rocky1 942]

has clive reece contacted them yet pal

[Guest D.F.K]

havnt been able to contact clive for 2 days, he knows the situation and knows the officer who lead the raid....

 

ill try him tomorrow again, hopefully find out what is going on

 

this is taking the life out of me physically an mentally exhausted

[reddawn 2,173]

havnt been able to contact clive for 2 days, he knows the situation and knows the officer who lead the raid....

 

ill try him tomorrow again, hopefully find out what is going on

 

this is taking the life out of me physically an mentally exhausted

 

if clive says he will try an sort it then he will mate, he is a lot of things, but honest he is, he is a real busy guy tho, leave him a message on ansaphone an tell him how worried ye are, i know that wont ease how ye feel mate, but its not ment to, its the truth

[whisperingeye 27]

can you get legall aid???

if so dont wait around get down to a good solicitor make sure you get the chance if necessary of a good barrister and start action quick,

please dont leave it for mr reese

[Guest D.F.K]

do i really need a specialist in the feild?

 

ill speak to clive and ask him for his adivce see if he suggests a normal barrister, im still really confused and not quite sure what to do, never been arrested before...

 

its all a nightmare to be honest....

[baldockbanks courser 598]

They won't given them back the r.s.p.c.a are a law to themselves. Theve got my mates dogs and they are in no hurry to return them.

Clive can't do a great deal the law needs changing regarding r.s.p.c.a.

[Guest D.F.K]

they dont really have power the do they?

 

the dogs are still my property there just boarding them in my eyes whilst they look for whatever there looking for...

 

there just time wasting jobs worths.

[reddawn 2,173]

they cant keep the dogs, even if you are found guilty they need to be signed over, sure they may not be in any hurry to fetch them back, but they cannot keep em without your say so, no matter who they think they are, its the law

[poacher3161 1,766]

They are a fekin law unto themselfs and no poltician gives a feck wat they get away with in abususeing their powers they would soon be brought to task if they went around trieng to close down and stop barbaric halhal slaughter houses though.

[Guest D.F.K]

are they allowed to keep them whilst investigation occurs?

 

 

when i got to answer bail they should either charge me or not? does this mean they have to give me them back then?

[baldockbanks courser 598]

The police are as bad they took a moter of me 6 month ago, and they know there case is very shaky to say the least now but they'll still hold it till the trial.

Which will cost the tax payer around £650 a month x 10 months = £6,500 + my compensation for the vehicle that has run out of tax, m.o.t,repairs and deplication of value and the loss of earnings being registered to my company.

 

I will go to the papers with the exact cost of the case including helicopter, court costs etc I might even get John craven at b.b.c to investigate it the slag!

This has got to stop, f f s all over men owning and working lurchers and terriers.

 

[Guest D.F.K]

this country is a disgrace this is england...................and its a joke

 

how dare they make me pay to get my own motor that is fully legit back off them as they choose to take it, its all upside down and wrong.

[morton 5,367]

they dont really have power the do they?

 

the dogs are still my property there just boarding them in my eyes whilst they look for whatever there looking for...

 

there just time wasting jobs worths.

The rspca have no real legal power,but they do have the backing of not only the police,but also the goverment,if any other charitable organisation flouted the law like they are allowed and encouraged to do,they would be open to litigation and bankrupted.Only when somebody takes them on,which will entail taking on the goverment and police,successfully and wins a case against them in the courts,then this sort of action by them will become more commonplace,they seem to have an agenda going now were dogs are seized on the flimsiest of evidence and kept from their owners until the case reaches court,even when the police think there is insufficient evidence to carry out a successful prosecutionthr rspca are carrying on and taking out private prosecutions.

[Tuzo 251]

they cant keep the dogs, even if you are found guilty they need to be signed over, sure they may not be in any hurry to fetch them back, but they cannot keep em without your say so, no matter who they think they are, its the law

 

If charges are brought and proved then the court decides what happens to the dogs.

[chook1 184]

they cant keep the dogs, even if you are found guilty they need to be signed over, sure they may not be in any hurry to fetch them back, but they cannot keep em without your say so, no matter who they think they are, its the law

 

Sorry but they can - if found guilty, it will be up to the judge to say if the rspca are to keep the dogs or not,

no matter if the owner refuses to sign the dogs over or not.

 

DFK - whilst an investigation is on going they can keep hold of any evidance, as thats what they

will be classing your dogs as.