BGD
-
Content Count
7,679 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
12
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Articles
Gun Dealer's and Fieldsports Shop's
Reloading Room
Blogs
Calendar
Store
Classifieds
Everything posted by BGD
-
Isn't the high price of silencers over there due to the tax stamp you need because it's an "NFA" item?
-
Where has anyone even asked me a question in this thread Here you are then...BGD Do you consider dogs to be disposable chattels? I see my dogs as part of the family first and foremost but at the end of the day they are property and I think you should be able to do what you want with them, I certainly don't think the state should be able to dictate how you breed them. So, chattel? Yes, disposable? Not really.
-
If you're the type to abuse your own mother and be a general lazy c**t you would have been like that with or without drugs IMO if it wasn't weed he'd be bullying his mother for money for drink or Xbox games etc.
-
Where has anyone even asked me a question in this thread The problem I see is breeding show spaniels that have huge long ears that constantly have trouble , GSD that are all but cripples , cavalier King Charles were the skull is to small for the brain , bulldogs that can't give birth naturally and can't breath properly the list is endless just can't be right ..why would you breed a defect into a dog just to conform to a breed standard that is far removed from the dogs original job , I've no problem splitting show and working dogs providing the show dogs are healthy .. The piece in
-
Where has anyone even asked me a question in this thread The problem I see is breeding show spaniels that have huge long ears that constantly have trouble , GSD that are all but cripples , cavalier King Charles were the skull is to small for the brain , bulldogs that can't give birth naturally and can't breath properly the list is endless just can't be right ..why would you breed a defect into a dog just to conform to a breed standard that is far removed from the dogs original job , I've no problem splitting show and working dogs providing the show dogs are healthy .. The piece in
-
Where has anyone even asked me a question in this thread
-
Vets would be my answer. Records could be easily kept on increasing problems that arising in certain breeds. Pretty straight forward I'd think.Already some have been mentioned which would be a good start. I just wouldn't be comfortable handing that power over to anyone, if you own the dogs and you're going to be rearing the pups it should be up to you whether you breed them or not. I'm turning all libertarian all of a sudden
-
Who decides what's unacceptably genetically defective? Should breeders have to apply to the government for permission to do a mating to make sure it won't result in genetically defective pups?
-
I just think it's a bit of a slippery slope, first they ban hunting, then dog shows and before you know it they've banned keeping dogs altogether which we all know is the end game for the animal rights squad. Gnasher got what I was getting at earlier in the thread, dogs are property and we should be able to do what we want with them, anything else just starts to sound like animal rights nonsense to me. Remember who made that programme about these problems with pedigree dogs and has been pushing the agenda ever since...
-
Sorting in the same way they sort people genuinely unable to work from the terminally workshy? Doctors don't have much to do with that, medical assessments for benefits aren't carried out by doctors. Really? If I had a medical assessment for anything, I'd want a doctor to do it. If my car breaks down I take it to a mechanic, not a baker. Yep really, they even like to ignore the recommendations given by the claimants GP who you'd think would know better than someone who spends a few minutes "assessing" them. There's a reason such a huge percentage of initial decisions are overturn
-
Sorting in the same way they sort people genuinely unable to work from the terminally workshy? Doctors don't have much to do with that, medical assessments for benefits aren't carried out by doctors.
-
So because something you like doing has been banned because certain folk deemed it cruel you're happy to stand shoulder to shoulder with those same antis to get dog shows banned? How about we all just do what we want with our dogs and stay out of eachother's business?
-
I just think we have to be careful talking about banning things we don't personally agree with because they're "cruel" Just look at who has been pushing this message of breeding show dogs being "cruel"....
-
If folk want to breed for looks and show their dogs what's the problem? A lot of these breeds don't even have a "job" to breed for anymore and the ones that are still used for work split into show and working lines and everyone is happy. I don't see why it should banned, at the end of the day it's up to them what they do with their dogs surely.
-
Spot on mackem
-
Jesus f***ing Christ now those should be fecking banned!!
-
Pity you didnt show the same level of concern when the news was full of the shitskin moslem b*****ds doing the grooming raping and torturing Why are you trying to draw attention away from this very real problem?
-
Life's too short to worry as much as you do. Surrounding your self with stuff like this will only depress you Appareciate the concern pal but why do you think I spend all my time worrying about this? I posted a single link I came across when looking through the news this morning
-
No point burying your head in the sand
-
They're not trousers ! No belt loops ! They're not underwear either so they're not pants! Can we settle on leggings?
-
Pants?! Are we American now?!
-
Seems there's an ongoing child abuse problem in British athletics too which has been covered up by the powers that be http://www.telegraph.co.uk/athletics/2016/12/01/athletics-dragged-sexual-abuse-scandal-amid-cover-up-claim/
-
I think that video is the most Australian thing I've ever seen
-
I can't believe anyone actually pays it these days, it's totally unenforceable.
-
What wrong with culling surplus pups? If more folk had the stomach for it the rescue centres wouldn't be overflowing with unwanted mutts. Plenty wrong with the way Hancock goes about things but criticising him for dealing with surplus pups is out of order IMO.
