Jump to content

shaaark

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    14,944

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

 Content Type 

Everything posted by shaaark

  1. shaaark
    Right, I get you ?
  2. shaaark
    You can't really compare them though mate. Carnera was a part time wrestler/circus strongman
  3. shaaark
    I don't recall really asking you anything about fury. Just stated a few facts about his, wilder's and joshua's past opponents, and gave my opinion about fury as a boxer, that's all. Certainly not going to lose sleep over it ?
  4. shaaark
    Ok, seems like you have all the answers lol ?
  5. shaaark
    Wrong again. I have no problem with him being a traveller. Makes absolutely no difference whatsoever as to my opinion of him as a boxer. He really just isn't that good, simple as that. And my earlier reply to you as to fury's ability, I didn't say he's been pinged 'occasionally'. I said he's been hit and dropped 'more than just occasionally'. Don't do a max on me and twist my words, just to try and make a point, which incidentally, failed
  6. shaaark
    The 'slaves want putting out of their misery'. How f****n old are you mate?!
  7. shaaark
    Have a look at maybe just a few of their respective opponents rankings, wilder's furys and joshua's, then reply with something a shade more sensible. Wallin is ranked 43rd, gave fury all the trouble he could handle, dropped and cut him, but fury's 'untouchable' lol. 43rd!! Lol Cunningham, a cruiserweight, dropped him with a peach of a punch, 'untouchable' fury lol Wilder knocked him down twice in the first fight. 'Untouchable' fury, with the great ring IQ lol Some of wilders opponents weren't even ranked in the top 200!! Lol Nothing condescending about my appraisal of
  8. shaaark
    If he takes the fight to wilder again, he certainly should beat him. Like I keep saying, wilder is pretty damn poor. Can't really see fury pushing joshua around the ring like he did with wilder. Joshua is far better fundamentally than wilder, and can genuinely box well and has k o power too. Some people say about fury's ring IQ. Can't really agree with that to be honest. Considering what some people claim about fury; ring IQ , boxing skills, is 'untouchable', according to max, he has been hit, cut and dropped on a fair number of occasions, therefore making all those claims more than a little s
  9. shaaark
    Now that, I can agree with ?
  10. shaaark
    Yeah, great analogy that. Having only one arm, as opposed to being tall. Yep, makes total sense ?
  11. shaaark
    They look a rum bunch gnash ?
  12. shaaark
    It's ok, just read about it lol ?
  13. shaaark
    Kin el stan, you're reading my mind! ?. Lol ??. And like you say, he improved enough, or changed trainer, to enable him to fight the right way to beat wilder in the 2nd fight. BUT, have a look at how lowly/poorly ranked ALL wilder's opponents were. f***ing dreadful. Fury is easily the best opponent he's ever faced, by a country mile. And don't take that as though I'm complimenting fury, rather it's highlighting how mediocre wilder is ?
  14. shaaark
    Why can't fury fight in the uk? I don't follow it all as much as I used to, all the boxing politics etc has pissed me off
  15. shaaark
    The only stupid question is the one that's never asked, grasshopper ?
  16. shaaark
    Why does anyone need to eat humble pie max? You basing that on fury's win in the 2nd wilder fight? I certainly haven't changed my general opinion of fury as a boxer. He went forward against a man who was 2 1/2- 3 stone lighter, that isn't that good a boxer in general, and certainly not when he's in defence mode. And his fight history is abysmally poor. That doesn't make fury the best heavyweight EVER
  17. shaaark
    He looks a tad HAFRICAN to me ?
  18. shaaark
    Dat sign iz BLACK ?
  19. shaaark
    Oh yes, he can certainly be contradictory ?
  20. shaaark
    ? how remiss of me ?
  21. shaaark
    I've tried to understand his posts quite often, but, I admit, nope, can't! ?. I mean, he loves beddys, but today's beddys are 'dross', 'shite', 'not worth breeding from', unless they're bred from his dogs! And he only keeps beddys with fell blood in now, because they suit him and what he expects of a working terrier. But fells/lakies/pats, are 'inferior' to a good beddy?! ?. What am I missing about what he writes? I certainly am NOT thick, but I really can't fathom what he's trying to get over to people in his posts! ?
  22. shaaark
    You need to read his beddy x posts mate ? ................ ??
  23. shaaark
    Does look collie/bull/greyound, nice dog ? In fact, that's exactly what I'd expect a collie/grey x bull/grey to look like, very nice dog. Hope he gives you plenty of days/nighhs work ?
  24. shaaark
    Fit dog, fair play ?
  25. shaaark
    ?
×
×
  • Create New...