Jump to content

chartpolski

Members
  • Content Count

    16,939
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    191

Everything posted by chartpolski

  1. It’s supposedly because Labour is doing away with all the local councils , county councils, etc and each county will only have one unitary council. This isn’t planned until three years time, but it looks like those councils under threat from Reform want to postpone any elections until the changes go through meaning some councillor’s will be in place unchallenged for seven years ! The councils can only ASK for a cancellation of elections, the government minister has to agree with it, but as Labour are forecast for a hiding in the local elections it’s a safe bet they will allow the cancella
  2. Two items on my bucket list are trips on The Rocky Mountain Railroad, US/Canada , and the ‘Ghan railroad across Australia. Cheers.
  3. When I retired 21 years ago, I could have gone to live anywhere; I have family in Australia, New Zealand, Canada, South Africa, Cyprus , the Middle East, but I chose to come home because my aging parents were still alive. Im to old to think about a major relocation now, I did that when I was in my 20’s and don’t regret a minute of it. I fear for the prospects of the young in this country. Cheers.
  4. Half of the councils that were due to hold local elections in May have cancelled them for at least three years . Councils where the polls say Reform were due to be very successful. Warnings of a gas shortage and possible power outages in the middle of the coldest part of the year. Farmers, right now, circling food distribution centres with tractors threatening to disrupt food supplies. God forbid that pensioners start to die of cold and hunger…… What is happening to my country ? Cheers.
  5. A good anology would be the non-ped and the coursing bred ! LOL ! Just having a bit fun mate, I’m having a good day ! Cheers
  6. I’ve broke my own vow not to invoke Godwin’s law already ! LOL ! Cheers.
  7. And Stalin, Lenin, Pol Pot, Kim, Caucescu, etc we’re communist by name only….they were Dictators. Far left or far right, a dictator is a dictator. Cheers.
  8. Never forget ; Nazi is short for National Socialist…… Cheers.
  9. Starmer has ordered the monitoring of Musks tweets by a Home Office group tracking “extremists”. Theres also talk of them blocking Musks tweets, how they would do that without banning X , I don’t know, but I’m sure Musk will relish the fight. It’ll be like Starmer turning up to a nuclear war armed with a catapult…. Cheers.
  10. Just used a 5 mcp lamp ! LOL ! Cheers .
  11. Michelle Dewbury on GBNews has just mentioned my birthday, I’ve never met her so I guess someone told her ! Cheers.
  12. Birthday today ? Elvis, Jimmy Paige, Joan Baez Princess Catherine And ME ! Cheers.
  13. Now behave yourself or next time you’ll be gone for good ! LOL ! Cheers.
  14. That’s exactly it mate , the Jay report didn’t look into the cover ups and corruption. Hopefully a new targeted inquiry will, but it goes so deep I fear a cover up of the cover ups ! Cheers.
  15. Andy Burnham has broke with the Labour Party and demanded an inquiry. I wonder if he will be accused of “jumping on a far right bandwagon “ ? Cheers.
  16. I despise the Tory’s and Labour equally. I think I’ve made my point, comprehensively, why I’d like an independent inquiry. Have you not read the court transcripts that have come out in the last few days ? Information that had to be dragged out by F.O.I. requests. I know you like to take the opposite view to the general consensus, probably to get a rise, a bite , a wind up, I’ve replied , I think, courteously and honestly, but I think it’s far to serious an affair to be the subject of a wind up, so I’ll bow out now. Cheers.
  17. As I said, the Jay inquiry barely touched on Pakistani grooming gangs, and it has since come to light that it’s far more widespread than thought when Jay did her inquiry. What I and many more would like is an independent inquiry focused solely on this aspect of child rape and who covered it up. It wouldn’t cost billions, that’s an exaggeration, of course the Jay inquiry was vastly expensive, £200 million and took seven years, but an independent inquiry that’s being asked for now would be far more focused and would be cheaper and quicker, although cost shouldn’t come into it when protectin
  18. How would an independent inquiry derail the Schools Bill , they are completely separate. Or are you talking about the Jay inquiry which is long finished and her recommendations are finally if belatedly being implemented. The schools bill is to reorganise the education system, nothing to do with grooming gangs. The Jay inquiry was a wide ranging inquiry into child abuse focusing on Saville, Cyril Smith, the Church, the BBC etc and hardly mentioned grooming gangs. People want an inquiry into the grooming/rape scandal as they are finally getting information from court transcripts e
  19. The amendment to the Schools bill was the nuclear option to force the Labour government into granting a national independent inquiry into specifically Pakistani grooming gangs. If Starmer had granted that inquiry the amendment would have been dropped. He refused and put his MP’s on a three line whip meaning anyone who didn’t vote against the amendment would be thrown out of the Labour Party. Now it appears HE didn’t vote against it, he ABSTAINED ! Why ? Well the only reason I can think of is when anyone accused him of voting against an inquiry he can say he DIDN’T vot
  20. Newkid is one of the good guys… Cheers.
  21. Have you read “The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail , Scotty mate ? I was quite intrigued by it years ago, and the Tom Hanks films are based on it. It basically postulates that the French Morovingian dynasty was the bloodline of Jesus and that the secret society of The Priory de Zion held proof of this. The Catholic Church did everything they could to debunk and ridicule this, but it is very thought provoking, even for a non- conspiracy theorist like me ! LOL ! Cheers.
  22. Starmer put a “three line whip” on his MP’s, meaning if they voted FOR an inquiry they would be thrown out of the Labour Party, but now it’s being reported that Starmer ABSTAINED from voting ! What a duplicitous coward….. Cheers.
  23. Maybe I see it differently to you because I’m an old man. I was a Labour voter when Labour was the party for the working man, the pensioner, the poor. But now I see they have abandoned us and court the votes of the Muslim, the immigrant, and have just, in a vote in Parliament, sided with Pakistani rape gangs who raped , tortured and murdered white, working class, poor children……exactly the people Labour were supposed to care for. Forget the Tory’s; they have never cared for us, but this Labour Party are acting AGAINST us. How any right thinking person could ever vote Labour a
  24. The Tory’s are disgraceful, but it was LABOUR councillors and MP’s that were complicit in the cover ups. When Labour MP Dunsczak complained, the Labour Party Chairman, Dobbins, and another senior Labour MP told him not to mention the ethnicity of the rapists as “ IT WOULD COST THEM VOTES” ! Labour are evil, they have no honour whatsoever, neither do the Tory’s, but tonight Labour could have done the honourable thing and voted for an inquiry but put their lust for power above the safety of our children and voted AGAINST an inquiry. I am beyond angry, if a Labour canvasser called at
  25. That should say “British LABOUR MP’s vote against a national inquiry “. Cheers.
×
×
  • Create New...