Yet he was involved with collecting, transporting, using, possesing a gun which is the reason he was under close surveillance right? That's my understanding.
Did the police KNOW he wasn't in immediate possesion of that firearm? They responded to a percieved threat with a split second decision. I wouldn't like to second guess them. Unfortunate outcome but could have all been avoided by keeping his hands and life clean of all that shit.
There was No evidence.
Read the evidence.
The police evidence was (reason to believe)
So not one person see a firearm on mark .
There was a handgun ret