HUNTING GIRLS CALENDAR

[jembo 0]

whos doing the lamping bit if no one is ill be happy to if chris takes me lol

 

georgia i dont mean to be rude but anyone under the age of 18 who has a picture taken of them that is deemed "sexual perocative" can get the photographer charged with child pornagraphy

 

for example someone could be fully clothed with there hands down there under crackers and that would be inapropriate where as on the other hand someone could be fully naked but in fetal position for example and that would be fine because it would be classed as "artistic nude....they are kind of two extremes but if most photographers even hear the mention of a underage girl being involved they are usually off in the other direction

 

dont mean to sound like a smart arse just i looked up all the laws on it when i was modeling

 

You raised a good point here , also bare in mind a lot of blokes would feel very uncomfortable knowing a lass of 13 was in the calender as well

 

 

Good point, it is going to have to be squeeky clean, otherwise we would end up in all manor of trouble from all sorts of people.

[JPTfellterrier 65]

whos doing the lamping bit if no one is ill be happy to if chris takes me lol

 

georgia i dont mean to be rude but anyone under the age of 18 who has a picture taken of them that is deemed "sexual perocative" can get the photographer charged with child pornagraphy

 

for example someone could be fully clothed with there hands down there under crackers and that would be inapropriate where as on the other hand someone could be fully naked but in fetal position for example and that would be fine because it would be classed as "artistic nude....they are kind of two extremes but if most photographers even hear the mention of a underage girl being involved they are usually off in the other direction

 

dont mean to sound like a smart arse just i looked up all the laws on it when i was modeling

 

You raised a good point here , also bare in mind a lot of blokes would feel very uncomfortable knowing a lass of 13 was in the calender as well

 

yeah they may do...dont mean to sound like a smart arse (i just like looking up laws its well funny and really interesting) or imbarase your georgia, just dont want the headlines in the news to be "hunters perve on under age girl in charity calander"....you get me

Edited November 6, 2008 by JPTfellterrier

[WxmHunter 0]

lol.. not long till 2013

[Kay 3,709]

whos doing the lamping bit if no one is ill be happy to if chris takes me lol

 

georgia i dont mean to be rude but anyone under the age of 18 who has a picture taken of them that is deemed "sexual perocative" can get the photographer charged with child pornagraphy

 

for example someone could be fully clothed with there hands down there under crackers and that would be inapropriate where as on the other hand someone could be fully naked but in fetal position for example and that would be fine because it would be classed as "artistic nude....they are kind of two extremes but if most photographers even hear the mention of a underage girl being involved they are usually off in the other direction

 

dont mean to sound like a smart arse just i looked up all the laws on it when i was modeling

 

You raised a good point here , also bare in mind a lot of blokes would feel very uncomfortable knowing a lass of 13 was in the calender as well

 

 

Good point, it is going to have to be squeeky clean, otherwise we would end up in all manor of trouble from all sorts of people.

 

Thats why it needs to be tastefull & kept to whats decent , men can use there own imaginations without us giving them any ideas

[WxmHunter 0]

im already on photoshop makin a preview

[mackem 23,996]

Kay,your the self-proclaimed Mary Whitehouse of THL

[Kay 3,709]

Kay,your the self-proclaimed Mary Whitehouse of THL

 

Well it has to be kept decent , people wont buy it if its just full of tits will they, its old hat anyway

[JPTfellterrier 65]

 

pictures similar to that is what i would deem apropriate(sorry to use my own picture google aint working proper)

 

or what was that picture on the front of that magazine? you know where it was the first woman ever to be on the front?

[WxmHunter 0]

[amroth29 0]

Kay,your the self-proclaimed Mary Whitehouse of THL

 

Well it has to be kept decent , people wont buy it if its just full of tits will they, its old hat anyway

i'll buy it .

[biffo 0]

im already on photoshop makin a preview

 

[Kay 3,709]

 

pictures similar to that is what i would deem apropriate(sorry to use my own picture google aint working proper)

 

or what was that picture on the front of that magazine? you know where it was the first woman ever to be on the front?

 

I totaly agree its not over the top & its tastefull

[Kay 3,709]

Kay,your the self-proclaimed Mary Whitehouse of THL

 

Well it has to be kept decent , people wont buy it if its just full of tits will they, its old hat anyway

i'll buy it .

Oh i give up

[WxmHunter 0]

wish people would pose like that in the feilds by me

[JPTfellterrier 65]

 

pictures similar to that is what i would deem apropriate(sorry to use my own picture google aint working proper)

 

or what was that picture on the front of that magazine? you know where it was the first woman ever to be on the front?

 

I totaly agree its not over the top & its tastefull

 

us lasses have to leave somthing to those lads imagination