Opinions.

[mitre 329]

If there is proof of photos on the phone he is done for 

[Greyman 32,033]

20 minutes ago, WILF said:

 

I’m not trying to “prove you wrong” lads, just saying how I feel.

 

Totally agree mate and in these cases it would be nice to be wrong 

[mitre 329]

Really the police should remove his phone and get it checked out by a expert and try and trace them photos and who sent them and locate them check that person out you never know you heard how how peodos network with each other and pass on images 

[Franks dad 2,190]

1 hour ago, mitre said:

Really the police should remove his phone and get it checked out by a expert and try and trace them photos and who sent them and locate them check that person out you never know you heard how how peodos network with each other and pass on images 

You should be in the job mate …. Have you  thought about joining the met ?

[gnipper 6,819]

3 hours ago, Seagull said:

You don't need to mind read ya plum, it's clear in black & white, the man has been charged with having indecent images of children on his phone!

Its not that clear there's no mention of it even being a phone, if it was something like a spam email with some dodgy link or something then the guy could be innocent. 

 If like everyone is assuming it was on his phone and received from a friend then I agree he should have done something about it if they were sent to him and he didn't ask for them. It's not grassing if its a nonce.