harryshounds 1,379 Posted 17 hours ago Report Share Posted 17 hours ago 6 minutes ago, Seagull said: To get a better grasp, imagine your family tree with millions of branches, it's like highlighting the branches that strictly go from mother to daughter. Every time a woman had no daughter or her daughters line ended, that branch is gone. After enough generations there would only be one remaining branch left that stays connected to everyone alive today. The person left at the root is Mitochondrial Eve. I get ya. There's DNA today that can be traced to Eve not that necessarily everyone today is directly related to Eve. Still definitely some out crossing imo, only way to explain the different types of humans.....Im not using that as a superiority bull shit just that at the same time at some stage different human like species definitely interbred in different parts of the planet and them hybrids were eventually morphed into the people we are today. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Seagull 387 Posted 17 hours ago Report Share Posted 17 hours ago 3 minutes ago, harryshounds said: I get ya. There's DNA today that can be traced to Eve not that necessarily everyone today is directly related to Eve. Still definitely some out crossing imo, only way to explain the different types of humans.....Im not using that as a superiority bull shit just that at the same time at some stage different human like species definitely interbred in different parts of the planet and them hybrids were eventually morphed into the people we are today. No, we all are mate, but it doesn't mean we got all our DNA from just her, remember it's just tracing the mitochondrial DNA, some of those branches were broken because the woman lineage ended, but the woman may have had a son. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Seagull 387 Posted 17 hours ago Report Share Posted 17 hours ago 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
harryshounds 1,379 Posted 17 hours ago Report Share Posted 17 hours ago But how could 4 billion people evolve if related to only a small handful of humans without serious inbreeding problems? Nature frowns on in breeding, small gene pools die out. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
harryshounds 1,379 Posted 16 hours ago Report Share Posted 16 hours ago We're inbred currs.....stop fighting over race Quote Link to post Share on other sites
chartpolski 27,561 Posted 16 hours ago Report Share Posted 16 hours ago (edited) Isn’t it “Lucy”, not “Eve” ? Cheers. Edited 16 hours ago by chartpolski 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Seagull 387 Posted 16 hours ago Report Share Posted 16 hours ago 6 minutes ago, chartpolski said: Isn’t it “Lucy”, not “Eve” ? Cheers. No mate, that's a different thing altogether mate, Lucy is the one of the oldest discovered humans, not homosapien though. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
harryshounds 1,379 Posted 16 hours ago Report Share Posted 16 hours ago Fascinating stuff. Im big into the Irish mythology neolithic stuff and how DNA science is basically proving that the ancient myths have the truth in em. Im sure the mythology of other cultures are the same. Our stories and native languages tells us everything. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
chartpolski 27,561 Posted 16 hours ago Report Share Posted 16 hours ago 3 minutes ago, Seagull said: No mate, that's a different thing altogether mate, Lucy is the one of the oldest discovered humans, not homosapien though. Isn’t it where the female line of DNA you were on about comes from ? ”Lucy “ is at least physical remains, “Eve” isn’t . Im not a geneticist or palaeontologist, but I find this an interesting conversation. Cheers. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
harryshounds 1,379 Posted 16 hours ago Report Share Posted 16 hours ago 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Seagull 387 Posted 16 hours ago Report Share Posted 16 hours ago 14 minutes ago, chartpolski said: Isn’t it where the female line of DNA you were on about comes from ? ”Lucy “ is at least physical remains, “Eve” isn’t . Im not a geneticist or palaeontologist, but I find this an interesting conversation. Cheers. No mate, her remains are way too old to extract DNA, Lucy is over 3 million years old. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Francie, 2,765 Posted 15 hours ago Report Share Posted 15 hours ago 2 hours ago, Seagull said: That's what's fascinating, go far enough back and we will all share a common ancestor. That's why I have to laugh when folk get uptight when we discuss human history. Yes an they were humans not primates lol Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Lenmcharristar 10,269 Posted 8 hours ago Report Share Posted 8 hours ago 7 hours ago, harryshounds said: Fascinating stuff. Im big into the Irish mythology neolithic stuff and how DNA science is basically proving that the ancient myths have the truth in em. Im sure the mythology of other cultures are the same. Our stories and native languages tells us everything. Most mythology is about gods who ruled over the earth, could they have been annunaki? 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Seagull 387 Posted 8 hours ago Report Share Posted 8 hours ago 6 hours ago, Francie, said: Yes an they were humans not primates lol Lucy was a hominem but she definitely wasn't homosapien. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Francie, 2,765 Posted 8 hours ago Report Share Posted 8 hours ago 18 minutes ago, Seagull said: Lucy was a hominem but she definitely wasn't homosapien. She was a small monkey mate,nothing more nothing less Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.