England.

[jukel123 9,276]

14 hours ago, pesky1972 said:

What has nationality got to do with what I posted? I’d have said exactly the same thing had the Spanish won. I find women’s football excruciating to watch at any level.
Not the first time you’ve brought my nationality into a thread, maybe it’s you that has a grievance.., or maybe some sort of penis envy? 
Oh, and it’s PG WODEHOUSE you fcuking philistine. If you’re going to quote someone at least spell their name right.

Calm down Jock. If you get this apoplectic about England women winning back to back trophies. How do you deal with mention of 1966?

https://www.sportphotogallery.com/football/1966-bobby-moore-england-world-cup-wembley-24093/

If you find women's football excruciating to watch, might I suggest you don't watch or comment on it?

Scots tend to be temperamental. Half temper and half mental. JOKE ffs! But they usually have a keen sense of banter. Yours seem to be absent.

Do you not see the irony in your furious response to my quoting Wodehouse's statement that "it is never difficult to distinguish between a Scotsman with a grievance and a ray of sunshine?"

I apologise profusely for my initial incorrect spelling of Wodehouse. It seems to have irked you beyond belief. But then you are a jock and quick to take offence, even on a dead Englishman's behalf.

As for penis envy, I'd always assumed a jock penis to be small, perhaps overweight, freckly and smothered with ginger pubes. Perhaps I am mistaken and yours is a magnificent, gargantuan member, worthy of gasps of appreciation from the THL massive. But we need proof. Publish and let us judge!

Whilst you are rummaging in the undergrowth  of your bollock area to find your manly magnificance,  why not take a moment, peruse the video below and join in the sense of British  pride in the enclosed video?

https://www.theguardian.com/football/2025/jul/28/lionesses-greeted-by-jubilant-england-fans-on-return-home-after-euro-2025-victory

Edited Tuesday at 11:56 by jukel123

[gnasher16 31,310]

23 hours ago, TOMO said:

Well it seemed pretty well received by all accounts 12 million watched it in the UK...and I suppose that's not counting pubs and other such places where 100,s of people watched it together....so obviously a good number of the population like it...

The mens Euro final was watched by 2.2 billion worldwide......but ok if ya like.

[gnasher16 31,310]

On 28/07/2025 at 16:26, WILF said:

No, of course it shouldn’t mate, but it is…..we all know the score.

Whether it should be ?, I genuinely have not thought about it but off the top of my head I’d rather watch women’s football, walking table tennis or whatever than Love Island.

Again, off the top of my head and not a strong opinion, it’s better something at least half a touch patriotic than some “poor me” f***ing Gaza bloke telling us it’s not their fault. 

Womens football has apparently been around for 150 years but has only had any attention in the last 5 years.....to pretend that womens football isnt being shoved infront of our faces from every angle because of diversity and diversity alone is naive at best.

I make your boy right mate it is tragic......tragic that a sport developed and built by men has to be preyed upon and exploited by women in order to elevate them in society......we love and respect women for what they are regardless,not because they can possibly do what men can do.....its utter bollocks.

Edited Tuesday at 17:34 by gnasher16

[dodger 3,587]

That Kelly bird the only quite fit one on the pitch aswell summet about her

[jukel123 9,276]

4 minutes ago, dodger said:

That Kelly bird the only quite fit one on the pitch aswell summet about her

There was something" f****n save that bitch!" about her penalty. I read her shot measured 110kph. Whereas the strongest shot in the premiership was Isak's against Liverpool at 109kph. How is that possible? 

[dodger 3,587]

5 minutes ago, jukel123 said:

There was something" f****n save that bitch!" about her penalty. I read her shot measured 110kph. Whereas the strongest shot in the premiership was Isak's against Liverpool at 109kph. How is that possible? 

Good point I meant good looking tho

[jukel123 9,276]

Just now, dodger said:

Good point I meant good looking tho

Admit it, you only tuned in hoping she would take her shirt off.

[gnasher16 31,310]

7 minutes ago, jukel123 said:

There was something" f****n save that bitch!" about her penalty. I read her shot measured 110kph. Whereas the strongest shot in the premiership was Isak's against Liverpool at 109kph. How is that possible? 

Because elite male players use technique instead of hoofing it as hard as they can ?

Either way the whole women can do what men can do claim is pretty tedious im sure we'd all agree.....not to mention totally unnecessary.

[jukel123 9,276]

2 minutes ago, gnasher16 said:

Because elite male players use technique instead of hoofing it as hard as they can ?

Either way the whole women can do what men can do claim is pretty tedious im sure we'd all agree.....not to mention totally unnecessary.

Fair.

[eastcoast 4,500]

1 hour ago, jukel123 said:

There was something" f****n save that bitch!" about her penalty. I read her shot measured 110kph. Whereas the strongest shot in the premiership was Isak's against Liverpool at 109kph. How is that possible? 

I didn't know that Isak had the recorded strongest shot in the EPL, that's why it's always worth logging on here. If that's true, and he kicks weaker than a girl? f**k him, let Liverpool have him. 

[jukel123 9,276]

4 minutes ago, eastcoast said:

I didn't know that Isak had the recorded strongest shot in the EPL, that's why it's always worth logging on here. If that's true, and he kicks weaker than a girl? f**k him, let Liverpool have him. 

It's probably bollocks anyway. Newspapers are full of bollocks.

[mitre 238]

At least they made it I would not like to be running around on the pitch for that length of time 

[chartpolski 27,470]

19 minutes ago, eastcoast said:

I didn't know that Isak had the recorded strongest shot in the EPL, that's why it's always worth logging on here. If that's true, and he kicks weaker than a girl? f**k him, let Liverpool have him. 

I’ve been talking to a few lads both inside and outside the club and it looks like Isak is burning his bridges.

I don’t know how true it is but he’s supposed to have invented the thigh injury to get out of the Asia tour and has now walked out of Darsley Park training ground.

The overwhelming opinion I’m hearing is that even if he is not sold, the supporters will turn on him.

Shame, a brilliant player and will be extremely difficult to replace.

Knowing the mindset of the Saudis, there will be a faction saying keep him , make him see out his contract in the reserves but that would be silly if someone is willing to pay £150 million for a mercenary !

Cheers.

[eastcoast 4,500]

18 minutes ago, jukel123 said:

It's probably bollocks anyway. Newspapers are full of bollocks.

Of course. Wealthy Arabs own NUFC, and they like the bonniest marbles. 

[jukel123 9,276]

4 minutes ago, eastcoast said:

Of course. Wealthy Arabs own NUFC, and they like the bonniest marbles. 

The team I support is owned by predatory yanks and an evil b*****d who between them have turned Old Trafford into a Manc free zone. It is now frequented by  comfortable, middle class, prawn sandwich individuals who make as much fan  noise as a Church of England prayer meeting.

The backroom staff have a unique ability to buy players  at enhanced, sky high prices and sell their long list of failures for f**k all. Its a unique business plan only possible because of support from far flung countries such as China and advertising deals.

Back in the fifties when we had proper cobbled  hills and proper Hovis, the players were part of the community. Eddie Coleman  a first team player and Munich casualty ( known as snakehips) was a local lad who lived in the next street to my Mrs. He would give you his autograph if you were cheeky enough to knock on his door.

Anyway I'm boring myself. Zźzzzzzzzzzz.