Monarchy Washing.

[jukel123 9,290]

Three photographs of the royals have pissed me off this week. The first which had me reaching for the vomit bucket was Kate Middleton in her jewels posing next to the kiddie who had to have his legs amputated following parental abuse. f**k me had the kid not had enough abuse in his life without the royals muscling in on national,sympathy?

 The second was William dressed in a Big Issues seller's hat and vest. Christ who are they trying to kid?  Pretending to give a shit, whilst they have obscene, tax funded  wealth and any number of luxury homes. Has he no shame?

The third was the " heartwarming " photo of the royal children wrapping Christmas presents to donate to poverty stricken children. Patronising, dishonest,, hypocritical royal spin machine at its most disgusting.

I would send the sponging lot of them to Rawanda. Or failing that, make them wear West Ham shirts for the rest of their lives. Then they would know what it's like to have a  permanent hump on their backs. Touché Wilf.

Edited December 13, 2023 by jukel123

[Lenmcharristar 10,269]

1 hour ago, jukel123 said:

Three photographs of the royals have pissed me off this week. The first which had me reaching for the vomit bucket was Kate Middleton in her jewels posing next to the kiddie who had to have his legs amputated following parental abuse. f**k me had the kid not had enough abuse in his life without the royals muscling in on national,sympathy?

 The second was William dressed in a Big Issues seller's hat and vest. Christ who are they trying to kid?  Pretending to give a shit, whilst they have obscene, tax funded  wealth and any number of luxury homes. Has he no shame?

The third was the " heartwarming " photo of the royal children wrapping Christmas presents to donate to poverty stricken children. Patronising, dishonest,, hypocritical royal spin machine at its most disgusting.

I would send the sponging lot of them to Rawanda. Or failing that, make them wear West Ham shirts for the rest of their lives. Then they would know what it's like to have a  permanent hump on their backs. Touché Wilf.

Agree, time they were gone, and with oul toffee nosed charlie boy at the helm it wont be long, he is giving away everything that is british in culture except the valuables, money and castles, and the pedo rings hes patron of

[DIDO.1 22,857]

I'm a monarchist at heart and I disagree with the left wing hatred, bitterness and resentment which power your posts. And he isn't in any pedo rings is he, that's just stupid. 

But I do agree that they are letting us down big style and ignoring invasions and threats to our nation through either stupidity or a misplaced sense of self preservation. I would like them all forced to defend their positions in a giant jousting competition death grudge match and new challengers choosen from Europe's landowners and gentry. 

Why do the challengers have to be from the upper classes I hear jukel cry? Because king Dave and queen Gemma doesn't quite cut it..... and it would probably be fixed to make sure a darkie won. 

So even though our views come from a different political point....I do agree, they are letting us down big style 

[TRUEBRIT66 2,075]

Always considered myself to be a bit of a Royalist but as time as gone on I have to agree their hypocrisy knows know bounds. Im starting to think they should just either slink away into the shadows or do something really radical and use some of their wealth/land and give it back to the people (Note: People not government).  

[WILF 49,731]

10 hours ago, jukel123 said:

Three photographs of the royals have pissed me off this week. The first which had me reaching for the vomit bucket was Kate Middleton in her jewels posing next to the kiddie who had to have his legs amputated following parental abuse. f**k me had the kid not had enough abuse in his life without the royals muscling in on national,sympathy?

 The second was William dressed in a Big Issues seller's hat and vest. Christ who are they trying to kid?  Pretending to give a shit, whilst they have obscene, tax funded  wealth and any number of luxury homes. Has he no shame?

The third was the " heartwarming " photo of the royal children wrapping Christmas presents to donate to poverty stricken children. Patronising, dishonest,, hypocritical royal spin machine at its most disgusting.

I would send the sponging lot of them to Rawanda. Or failing that, make them wear West Ham shirts for the rest of their lives. Then they would know what it's like to have a  permanent hump on their backs. Touché Wilf.

You don’t have to send them to Rwanda, Rwanda came to them…..only difference is they don’t have to live down in the shit that the halfwit King and his horse faced old woman is advocating for ! 
 

I was always a massive royalist, it was part of who we are but traitors are traitors and the King is a traitor……when the head of state is buying into the holocaust being committed on his own people then he is at least, not fit for purpose. 

[Lenmcharristar 10,269]

7 hours ago, DIDO.1 said:

I'm a monarchist at heart and I disagree with the left wing hatred, bitterness and resentment which power your posts. And he isn't in any pedo rings is he, that's just stupid. 

But I do agree that they are letting us down big style and ignoring invasions and threats to our nation through either stupidity or a misplaced sense of self preservation. I would like them all forced to defend their positions in a giant jousting competition death grudge match and new challengers choosen from Europe's landowners and gentry. 

Why do the challengers have to be from the upper classes I hear jukel cry? Because king Dave and queen Gemma doesn't quite cut it..... and it would probably be fixed to make sure a darkie won. 

So even though our views come from a different political point....I do agree, they are letting us down big style 

Is he not head of any paedo rings?? Most of the ones which have titles to their names have been proven nonces, so yes hes head of those rings

[DIDO.1 22,857]

53 minutes ago, Lenmcharristar said:

Is he not head of any paedo rings?? Most of the ones which have titles to their names have been proven nonces, so yes hes head of those rings

He's not though is he 

[Lenmcharristar 10,269]

49 minutes ago, DIDO.1 said:

He's not though is he 

Mmmmmmmm seems to run in that family

[DIDO.1 22,857]

16 minutes ago, Lenmcharristar said:

Mmmmmmmm seems to run in that family

Yeah but it doesn't really does it. 

[.357shooter 1,363]

must admit i have no time for them.the king should have defended this country of ours and made the politicians do something to stop this never ending tide of freeloaders.i know he has no power but he could have put some pressure on them to do something if he had said this needs to be stopped.that was the right thing to do.as history will not remember him for doing feck all.

[ditchman 3,282]

yup get rid of the lot of them...............

"LONG LIVE PRESIDENT BLAIR AND HIS ISSUE"

[DIDO.1 22,857]

My changing point was how the monarchy has abandoned the countryside. The countryside has been good to the royals. Harry after his mum died was out digging with hunt terriermen regular, not one of them lads, all on £100 a fckin week, grassed him up to the papers, lads who could really have done with 10 grand from the newspapers. The king sought solice out fishing and shooting, again, none of those keepers or ghillies betrayed his trust. William out hunting in Africa.

Now those same lads are loosing everything and the royals are all about rewilding and apologising to the darkies.....not a word of support for those who supported them 

[king 12,025]

1 hour ago, .357shooter said:

must admit i have no time for them.the king should have defended this country of ours and made the politicians do something to stop this never ending tide of freeloaders.i know he has no power but he could have put some pressure on them to do something if he had said this needs to be stopped.that was the right thing to do.as history will not remember him for doing feck all.

Well he ain't a proper king if he ain't got no power mate..

What's the point of having a king of a country if he can't rule the country..

[Lenmcharristar 10,269]

Hhe has all the power he needs, he can shut the government down and let the military run the nation until the peoples get a new one elected to serve them not themselves who get elected, he could also just ring up the navy and say get that nipped in rhe bud, and also send them by human cannon back onto the beaches of france, he can do plenty but went woke and full left wing, he is ignoring the very peoples who he depends on keeping him in his lavish lifestyle, these foreign imports will vote him out quicker that cameltoes kacks came off at the polo ball. 

[WILF 49,731]

26 minutes ago, king said:

Well he ain't a proper king if he ain't got no power mate..

What's the point of having a king of a country if he can't rule the country..

What he has is a voice, and it’s a voice that would be heard all around the world if he used it……but he doesn’t and they haven’t.