Jordan Peterson ?

[Born Hunter 17,910]

3 minutes ago, Ken's Deputy said:

Wow! Thanks, Born! That was a fukking answer ~ and from the last person on the planet I'd have imagined would have any interest in such stuff.

(Forgive me; Peterson? Maybe so. Brains there. But, Rogan?! Cage Fight Commentator? Maybe I judged That book by the cover)

Dunno. I'm now Way too conscious of time to squander mine, where I can help it. Maybe though, with this new clue, I could give these guys a try as a more 'down time' thing

Not sure I need any advice on how to walk and talk, at my stage in the game. Walking ~ at all ~ is quite enough for me! And, I try not to even bother with the whole 'world view' shit any more. Fukk all I can do about that.

But, maybe Jo Ro? Might be interesting, just to Watch him.

Unlike many other alternatives to the mainstream, Rogan is not pretending to be a free thinker to entertain and promote a biased worldview, he's genuinely in pursuit of the truth and whatever excites his mind. The vast majority of alternative media sources have an agenda that they are pushing through a veil of "we're free thinkers". Joe is not an academic, but he is a free thinker and has the skills to make his platform engaging and widely available, in a world where a significant portion of the establishment are actively or passively opposed to him.

He's a born again bow hunter and has been part of a very significant rebranding of what modern hunters are.

He's had guests on to cover all manor of subjects and issues. Politics is only a tiny portion of it and it'd be wrong to give you the impression that he's some sort of activist. That said he's had some serious players from politics on with guests such as Sanders, McMaster, Gabard etc. He's quite literally just a very successful free thinker who publishes long conversations with a wide variety of people on a wide variety of subjects.

[Wolfdog91 7,737]

1 minute ago, Born Hunter said:

Unlike many other alternatives to the mainstream, Rogan is not pretending to be a free thinker to entertain and promote a biased worldview, he's genuinely in pursuit of the truth and whatever excites his mind. The vast majority of alternative media sources have an agenda that they are pushing through a veil of "we're free thinkers". Joe is not an academic, but he is a free thinker and has the skills to make his platform engaging and widely available, in a world where a significant portion of the establishment are actively or passively opposed to him.

He's a born again bow hunter and has been part of a very significant rebranding of what modern hunters are.

He's had guests on to cover all manor of subjects and issues. Politics is only a tiny portion of it and it'd be wrong to give you the impression that he's some sort of activist. That said he's had some serious players from politics on with guests such as Sanders, McMaster, Gabard etc. He's quite literally just a very successful free thinker who publishes long conversations with a wide variety of people on a wide variety of subjects.

There a lot of people who hate him because he doesn't have a set point which is sad to say the least.

More people hate him because he's able to have a legit conversation.

 

[Born Hunter 17,910]

3 minutes ago, Wolfdog91 said:

There a lot of people who hate him because he doesn't have a set point which is sad to say the least.

More people hate him because he's able to have a legit conversation.

Do you really think the people that hate him have ever listened to him, beyond what they have been fed in their echo chamber?

His success threatens the status quo. And challenging him is hard, as he's clearly a very decent human being and not the monster they want him to be.

[Ken's Deputy 4,462]

12 minutes ago, Born Hunter said:

Gabard

 

Tulsie? (Scuttles off to find a link! )

 

[Born Hunter 17,910]

5 minutes ago, Ken's Deputy said:

 

Tulsie? (Scuttles off to find a link! )

 

Here's one with Jocko

 

[Born Hunter 17,910]

I genuinely enjoy actually watching them. I don't watch many, but I'll do an hour or two in a evening on the box. I couldn't imagine being able to engage completely with just audio.

[THE STIFFMEISTER 17,115]

I think Rogan gets too much credit .

I listen to him nearly constantly and his best and I mean by far best podcasts are when he has less serious politicised people on . 
joey Diaz , bill burr , Steve rinella , they are enthralling . 
 

Graham Hancock , bob Lazaar , Alex Jones , most of the ex military sf types , the one who chased nazis in South America especially, whilst entertaining , are pulp and blasé . Eddie bravo is too much . The fbi guy he has on is a masterpiece in saying lots but saying nothing . 
 

but by far , the best Joe rogan guest imho is dr Peter attia , a competitive long distance swimmer who just immerses you in admiration for a mindset and physicality you just can’t imagine having . His shark stories are unreal . What a colossus . 
 

 

but then again there’s always goggins ..

 

 

[keepdiggin 9,566]

Just now, THE STIFFMEISTER said:

I think Rogan gets too much credit .

I listen to him nearly constantly and his best and I mean by far best podcasts are when he has less serious politicised people on . 
joey Diaz , bill burr , Steve rinella , they are enthralling . 
 

Graham Hancock , bob Lazaar , Alex Jones , most of the ex military sf types , the one who chased nazis in South America especially, whilst entertaining , are pulp and blasé . Eddie bravo is too much . The fbi guy he has on is a masterpiece in saying lots but saying nothing . 
 

but by far , the best Joe rogan guest imho is dr Peter attia , a competitive long distance swimmer who just immerses you in admiration for a mindset and physicality you just can’t imagine having . His shark stories are unreal . What a colossus . 
 

 

but then again there’s always goggins ..

 

 

Jake the snakes roberts was a good podcast

[Ken's Deputy 4,462]

" Jocko "! Two birds with one stone then! I'm sick and fukking tired of seeing that name crop up. Haven't got a fukking clue who he is.

But, then? I've never seen Tulsie move either. Only ever caught glimpses of photo's. (Looks Right up my street though! )

I'll bookmark that one for later. Busy day.

[Wolfdog91 7,737]

13 minutes ago, THE STIFFMEISTER said:

I think Rogan gets too much credit .

I listen to him nearly constantly and his best and I mean by far best podcasts are when he has less serious politicised people on . 
joey Diaz , bill burr , Steve rinella , they are enthralling . 
 

Graham Hancock , bob Lazaar , Alex Jones , most of the ex military sf types , the one who chased nazis in South America especially, whilst entertaining , are pulp and blasé . Eddie bravo is too much . The fbi guy he has on is a masterpiece in saying lots but saying nothing . 
 

but by far , the best Joe rogan guest imho is dr Peter attia , a competitive long distance swimmer who just immerses you in admiration for a mindset and physicality you just can’t imagine having . His shark stories are unreal . What a colossus . 
 

 

but then again there’s always goggins ..

 

 

Had to stop listening to David goggins for work out motivation. Like would be half way though my work out something pushups in and listening to this dude talk about how he did his first marathon ,had to tape his legs up during hell week and I'm just here like " f**k....I'm really a bitch aren't I ? " Dude is completely built different 

[Born Hunter 17,910]

1 hour ago, THE STIFFMEISTER said:

Graham Hancock , bob Lazaar , Alex Jones , most of the ex military sf types , the one who chased nazis in South America especially, whilst entertaining , are pulp and blasé . Eddie bravo is too much . The fbi guy he has on is a masterpiece in saying lots but saying nothing . 

CIA fella? Mike Baker. I know what you mean, but I like the subject matter.

Edited September 7, 2022 by Born Hunter

[Born Hunter 17,910]

I like it when one occasionally crops up that is engaging from a character who's profession or field I have very little interest in. It's refreshing being exposed to something different because the person is just interesting.

Cowboy Cerrone and Whitney Cummings are two that come to mind.

[Neobliviscaris1776 1,998]

Their both good characters in general.

Joe has many interesting guests. He is however an open user of DMT so really is a very unreliable source imo. To conclude he is intelligent would be a mistake as no intelligent person would use psychedelic drugs in the first place.

Jordan has his finger on the pulse of some of the reasons for the world's disunity and reasons logically on it.

However neither actually challenge the cause of such division and the source of propaganda ie the establishment, globalism and the deep state, hence they survive and are permitted to exist for us all to experience. 

If they did target the actual suspects behind the main threats humanity faces then they would be dragged through the mud and taken down.

They don't so life goes on. 

Edited September 7, 2022 by Neobliviscaris1776

[dytkos 17,945]

I'm soooooo glad that my mindset allows me to live my life having no idea who these people are or what they do.

Cheers, D.

[dytkos 17,945]

I'm soooooo glad that my mindset allows me to live my life having no idea who these people are or what they do.

Cheers, D.