Jump to content

40 years ago today


Recommended Posts

21 minutes ago, JBs Left Peg said:

I think it was late 80s when the SA predominantly took over from the SLR ?

Could be miles away but all the footage of the Falklands Iv seen looks like soldiers are carrying the SLR ?

not sure why that emojis there lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 37
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Cant believe its 40 yrs today, that the falklands conflict began,  seems to me just like yesterday, just thinking about all the lives that were lost from british forces, lost a couple of classmates to

The battle rifle of the falklands was 100% the SLR, yes. Both sides used them. Only units that didn’t would be special forces I think, who by then had armalites. Brit rifles were semiauto and arg

Seemed like the place to post this rather than a new thread. This is RFA Sir Tristram, served in the Falkland’s and even survived being bombed. Can’t be many vessels left from that era now. Maybe

Posted Images

The SA80 levelled up ammunition use, it made better logistical sense to use a 5.56 like our American allies rather than a 7.62 that could knock down a buffalo at 900 m !

Also, smaller I’m guessing and maybe lighter.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, THE STIFFMEISTER said:

It’s tactically a better rifle as it removes three people rather than killing one with the slr 

 

I think the yanks did a study and decided that firepower won battles, not calibre. So they wanted troops to be able to carry more ammunition. Early trials in Vietnam showed some serious wounds and killing power but I think that was put down to the specific round tested which tumbled on impact.

Interestingly it looks like the yanks are now going to go to an intermediate calibre. The 6.8mm sig has won the contract.

WWW.ARMYTIMES.COM

An unloaded XM5 rifle is two pounds heavier than an unloaded M4. But the XM250 is four...

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, THE STIFFMEISTER said:

It’s tactically a better rifle as it removes three people rather than killing one with the slr 

 

What about hand grenades ? 

Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, WILF said:

When you keep in mind our kit was utter dogshit too, The Falklands was a turning point for personal kit….boots being the big one.

 

my mate who fought in the falklands said the same about the kit ,spent the whole time wet with trench foot and piles but was one of the lucky ones because that was his only gripe

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...