Jump to content

Ancient history programme


Recommended Posts


  • Replies 127
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Ah yes, the distinctive alarm call of the homo homo pygmius.

Not really  into the racial purity\arguments ,but I do find it interesting that all the NEW DNA research and discoveries ,fits the narrative of the day suspiciously neatly .

Well look into it you fkn dimwit  .

Posted Images

Just now, Greb147 said:

Sorry I meant to say Adam & Eve were the first humans that were born out of nothing. ?

It was just funny the way you said it big dog lol

As Stan is indicating, I'd take it with a pinch of salt. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Francie said:

I said it was funny the way you think it's fascinating lol look around the globe, folk are still different. 

Yes I get that and you can clearly see differences between people. 

When you see some of these isolated tribes and pockets of humans, the pygmies and such. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

From what I read they believe Neanderthal entered our gene pool at a specific point in time despite there  being  ample opportunity to have a continuous gene flow for thousands of years. 

To me this tells me that these interactions happened quite early on from our interactions when we were more closely related genetically.

 

Edited by Greb147
Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Greb147 said:

From what I read they believe Neanderthal entered our gene pool at a specific point in time despite there  being  ample opportunity to have a continuous gene flow for thousands of years. 

To me this tells me that these interactions happened quite early on from our interactions when we were more closely related genetically.

 

But how does that fit in with neanderthals, they had larger brains an stronger bones etc

Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, Francie said:

But how does that fit in with neanderthals, they had larger brains an stronger bones etc

I don't read to much into things like that, imagine in 15000 years someone will dig up that boxer valuev and his family and come to one conclusion then dig up say a mushroom type of person what will they think then? Two different sapien types? In Neanderthal times I'd imagine being big and strong  and durable with some brains about you was essential for surviving ergo we find big strong skeletons with a big brain the scrawny ones prob rarely survived childhood.

Edited by JDHUNTING
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, JDHUNTING said:

I don't read to much into things like that, imagine in 15000 years someone will dig up that boxer valuev and his family and come to one conclusion then dig up say a mushroom type of person what will they think then? Two different sapien types? In Neanderthal times I'd imagine being big and strong  and durable with some brains about you was essential for surviving ergo we find big strong skeletons with a big brain the scrawny ones prob rarely survived childhood.

That's well put jd, so we're does that leave all these "discoveries" 

I read a few years ago, when I was down the rabbit hole, that a very well known German I think dentist, got to analyse the actual neanderthal bones, an he said there teeth are human teeth? 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Francie said:

That's well put jd, so we're does that leave all these "discoveries" 

I read a few years ago, when I was down the rabbit hole, that a very well known German I think dentist, got to analyse the actual neanderthal bones, an he said there teeth are human teeth? 

I would like to hear someone explain your post mate, if they found valuev then wee mush lol sorry mush, what would be there outcome? 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Francie said:

That's well put jd, so we're does that leave all these "discoveries" 

The genetic difference between shroom and Valuev will be small compared to any sapien and a neanderthal. It's just not true, especially when you build up a dataset that reduces the statistics.

2 minutes ago, Francie said:

I read a few years ago, when I was down the rabbit hole, that a very well known German I think dentist, got to analyse the actual neanderthal bones, an he said there teeth are human teeth? 

The 'Homo' in Homo Neanderthalensis literally means 'human'...

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Born Hunter said:

The genetic difference between shroom and Valuev will be small compared to any sapien and a neanderthal. It's just not true, especially when you build up a dataset that reduces the statistics.

The 'Homo' in Homo Neanderthalensis literally means 'human'...

Goodman born, could you give us an example of a sapien an a neanderthal, an explains the differences? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...