Jump to content

Big Brother Is Watching You


Recommended Posts


  • Replies 152
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

I'm no on Facebook it's a site for nosey b*****d's so kinda ironic them thereselfs are getting the tables turned on them lol

Another one not on Facebook , can’t understand this fixation for telling every one every detail of your life ..they can all fcuk themselves off ..

Specifically? The fact that GCHQ/NSA are monitoring everything I do pretty much unregulated and unaccountably or that this is a massive abuse of government and liberty? The fact I'm being monitor

Posted Images

26 minutes ago, ChrisJones said:

Next question is 'then why do you want to make it bigger?'

I don't have a tablet or smartphone, and while I fully understand how privacy works on the internet that doesn't mean I'm going to simply give up that right.

Mankind has indeed been using propaganda since the beginning but the issue is the specific nature of the campaign and profiling that is used to predict and influence.

You could've just said you don't mind not having a right to privacy! Are there any other rights you'd prefer not to have?

The difference is that they're paying a corporation to personally tailor that propaganda to you, and you're absolutely alright with that?

But you didn't answer the question...

:whistling:https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism

Be all this as it may, I don't think it should be banned. It's our responsibility to communicate, to debate and argue, to discredit sources that are biased. I think we'll "find a way", it just might take a bit of turmoil on the process.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Born Hunter said:

Be all this as it may, I don't think it should be banned. It's our responsibility to communicate, to debate and argue, to discredit sources that are biased. I think we'll "find a way", it just might take a bit of turmoil on the process.

I can go with that I guess I'm just shocked at the difference in opinions towards rights.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, ChrisJones said:

I can go with that I guess I'm just shocked at the difference in opinions towards rights.

I'm on board with you regarding right to privacy. I'm just not sure anymore where that line is drawn on the net/Social media? Using the information we put into the public domain to tailor propaganda etc I don't see a problem with (at least not one that should be fixed). What is classed as public domain on the other hand I feel is a bit grey these days and makes me twitchy, for the privacy reason obviously. But perhaps I've just been 'normalised'! :laugh:

Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, scothunter said:

Simple solution delete you're facebook account. But I suspect there be a lot would have withdrawal symptoms like a junkie not knowing what there mate had for dinner.

Am not giving up Facebook to lose out on Grandad, he's like me. We're not freytened!

 

 

Edited by Kerny92
Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Born Hunter said:

I'm on board with you regarding right to privacy. I'm just not sure anymore where that line is drawn on the net/Social media? Using the information we put into the public domain to tailor propaganda etc I don't see a problem with (at least not one that should be fixed). What is classed as public domain on the other hand I feel is a bit grey these days and makes me twitchy, for the privacy reason obviously. But perhaps I've just been 'normalised'! :laugh:

Hard to call. I understand that using the WWW is a transaction between user and site. You will handover certain information as part of the deal. I get that and I accept that it's part of the experience.

However...

Social media has normalised transparency. Facebook have either negligently allowed their data to be breached or Cambridge Analytica has taken it under false pretences. CA's particular niggle is that they've accessed not only the participator (in the guise of whoever has loaded this app) but all of their friends, and then their friends, such is the elaborate nature of this application. As is mentioned in the video above they take this extremely personal information and use it to create content that will go as far as it needs to to make you receptive to their message. The content's accuracy is irrelevant as it's about engaging and controlling behaviour and you only have to look at GT to see how the content is shared and posted.

They've essentially weaponised social media.

 

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, ChrisJones said:

Hard to call. I understand that using the WWW is a transaction between user and site. You will handover certain information as part of the deal. I get that and I accept that it's part of the experience.

However...

Social media has normalised transparency. Facebook have either negligently allowed their data to be breached or Cambridge Analytica has taken it under false pretences. CA's particular niggle is that they've accessed not only the participator (in the guise of whoever has loaded this app) but all of their friends, and then their friends, such is the elaborate nature of this application. As is mentioned in the video above they take this extremely personal information and use it to create content that will go as far as it needs to to make you receptive to their message. The content's accuracy is irrelevant as it's about engaging and controlling behaviour and you only have to look at GT to see how the content is shared and posted.

They've essentially weaponised social media.

 

It just isn't true though as the vast majority of information that is shared on Facebook is what Kathleen had for tea or how hungover Roy is. Of course there's plenty of bullshit on there but that's usually the work of an idiot who shouldn't be allowed oxygen let alone a laptop.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Kerny92 said:

It just isn't true though as the vast majority of information that is shared on Facebook is what Kathleen had for tea or how hungover Roy is. Of course there's plenty of bullshit on there but that's usually the work of an idiot who shouldn't be allowed oxygen let alone a laptop.

Maybe in your stream but it's the personal interaction of everything you do while logged in. He says so in the video above. Unless he's lying?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...