The Atheist Delusion

[Born Hunter 17,907]

The man forgives his molester for an offence from a time when such things were more easily gotten away with and that's justification for calling him a pedophile!?

 

f***ing hell! I think your reasons for calling him such a vile thing without evidence is your own hatred of the man.

Edited November 3, 2016 by Born Hunter

[Francie 6,368]

I disagree mate, i think christians will be more ridiculed an soceity will turn against us, it says so in the bible.

 

Just cause the churches you work in are empty or gimpy people attending that doesnt mean Gods not true does it.

 

The church has badly lost its way, corrupt, money minded, paedophilia etc.

That doesnt mean theres no beleivers mate.

[Francie 6,368]

The man forgives his molester for an offence from a time when such things were more easily gotten away with and that's justification for calling him a pedophile!?

 

f***ing hell! I think your reasons for calling him such a vile thing without evidence is your own hatred of the man.

Born your not usually of the mark, but you are now, i said he could possibly....

 

I didnt call him a paedo.

 

So now your defending someone who says that being softly molested is fine, come on man ffs.

 

Plus i dont hate him, i pity him, i mean come on born hes defending paedophilia man, whatever way you want to dress it up.

Edited November 3, 2016 by Francie

[scothunter 12,609]

I think you should drop that angle francie. If anyone is guilty of kiddy fiddling its fucing priests.

and coveted up and protected by the high men of the cloth.

 

im suprised you can see out of that big f***ing hole you are digging. I agree with born your a pretty hate filled person when it comes to any criticism towards your faith/religion.

 

I also think you revel in these threads its been done to death and you pretty much know everyone stance on this topic but you like to dig it up again and again.

 

Well heres my view again if it slipped your mind. Its utter bollocks!

[Born Hunter 17,907]

 

The man forgives his molester for an offence from a time when such things were more easily gotten away with and that's justification for calling him a pedophile!?

 

f***ing hell! I think your reasons for calling him such a vile thing without evidence is your own hatred of the man.

Born your not usually of the mark, but you are now, i said he could possibly....

 

I didnt call him a paedo.

 

So now your defending someone who says that being softly molested is fine, come on man ffs.

 

 

I'm not being funny but publicly saying "I reckon that fella could be a pedo!" is no fecking different to saying "that fella is a pedo!".

 

You just don't do that and frankly saying it in such a indirect way is even more pathetic because when confronted it leaves you the get out clause of saying "I didn't say he was, just that he might". No decent man of moral substance does that publicly.

 

I don't agree with what he says, I understand it but don't agree. I can't then with any conscience accuse him of maybe fiddling kids!

[Francie 6,368]

Again born i never said he was a paedo, i said he could possibly do it to someone, because of his view on it.

 

Do you not think thats plausible?

[Francie 6,368]

I think you should drop that angle francie. If anyone is guilty of kiddy fiddling its fucing priests.

and coveted up and protected by the high men of the cloth.

 

im suprised you can see out of that big f***ing hole you are digging. I agree with born your a pretty hate filled person when it comes to any criticism towards your faith/religion.

 

I also think you revel in these threads its been done to death and you pretty much know everyone stance on this topic but you like to dig it up again and again.

 

Well heres my view again if it slipped your mind. Its utter bollocks!

Look scot ive first hand experience of molestation, an any c**t who condones it in any way, or trys to put it in different brackets is a f***ing dirty f***ing scumbag, so give your head a shake ffs.

[Born Hunter 17,907]

Again born i never said he was a paedo, i said he could possibly do it to someone, because of his view on it.

 

Do you not think thats plausible?

 

I think you're totally misrepresenting the man simply to justify calling him the most vile thing you can dream up and then not even having the bollocks to directly say it.

 

Publicly stating that you think someone is possibly a pedophile IS NO DIFFERENT to saying that they are! The social impact is horrendous!

 

Call him a c**t for his views, call him immoral........... but you can't throw that word around publicly, directly or indirectly!

Edited November 3, 2016 by Born Hunter

[scothunter 12,609]

Your a nutcase!

[Francie 6,368]

 

 

Again born i never said he was a paedo, i said he could possibly do it to someone, because of his view on it.

 

Do you not think thats plausible?

I think you're totally misrepresenting the man simply to justify calling him the most vile thing you can dream up and then not even having the bollocks to directly say it.

 

Publicly stating that you think someone is possibly a pedophile IS NO DIFFERENT to saying that they are! The social impact is horrendous!

 

Call him a c**t for his views, call him immoral........... but you can't throw that word around publicly, directly or indirectly!

I see what your saying born, i over stepped the mark an il take it back, but i still think hes a scumbag for his views on it.

If this sort of thing happened to to you, you might be able to see were im coming from, i apolagise.

[Born Hunter 17,907]

 

 

Again born i never said he was a paedo, i said he could possibly do it to someone, because of his view on it.

 

Do you not think thats plausible?

I think you're totally misrepresenting the man simply to justify calling him the most vile thing you can dream up and then not even having the bollocks to directly say it.

 

Publicly stating that you think someone is possibly a pedophile IS NO DIFFERENT to saying that they are! The social impact is horrendous!

 

Call him a c**t for his views, call him immoral........... but you can't throw that word around publicly, directly or indirectly!

I see what your saying born, i over stepped the mark an il take it back, but i still think hes a scumbag for his views on it.

If this sort of thing happened to to you, you might be able to see were im coming from, i apolagise.

 

 

Look fella, I still think you're batshit, lol, as I'm sure you do me, but I do have a bit of respect for you because you will try to recognise when you overstep the mark and apologies for it. Fair play for that mate and I try to be the same way.

[Francie 6,368]

 

 

 

 

Again born i never said he was a paedo, i said he could possibly do it to someone, because of his view on it.

 

Do you not think thats plausible?

I think you're totally misrepresenting the man simply to justify calling him the most vile thing you can dream up and then not even having the bollocks to directly say it.

 

Publicly stating that you think someone is possibly a pedophile IS NO DIFFERENT to saying that they are! The social impact is horrendous!

 

Call him a c**t for his views, call him immoral........... but you can't throw that word around publicly, directly or indirectly!

I see what your saying born, i over stepped the mark an il take it back, but i still think hes a scumbag for his views on it.

If this sort of thing happened to to you, you might be able to see were im coming from, i apolagise.

Look fella, I still think you're batshit, lol, as I'm sure you do me, but I do have a bit of respect for you because you will try to recognise when you overstep the mark and apologies for it. Fair play for that mate and I try to be the same way.

Lol ?

Same mate

[Francie 6,368]

Your a nutcase!

Do you want to take this offline, lol

[gamerooster 1,179]

A man without beliefs is a man with no purpose in life

[Mr Wasp 219]

Religion over time has just been a tool for control. Take a look at suicide bombers.

Who in their right mind would just up and blow themselves and innocent people up? They have obviously been brainwashed into some weird belief.

Strange that the plotters of such acts never do it themselves. Its a form of control.

 

Anyway, believe what you want to believe, as long as it doesnt hurt or affect anyone else.

 

Having read some previous threads about religion on here, some of the weird things some come out with... What was it last time? The earth is 4000 years old or something.

Yea.

 

Having said the above, what i do find interesting regarding the science part, no one can even take a guess at how or what started the universe (big bang theory) or what was there before hand.

 

God: Apparently, he made us in his own image?

Anyone with an ounce of scientific thinking behind them will consider the fact that there is a high possibility of other life in the universe. If this is true, some of that life may have been around a lot longer than humans.

If that is the case, why wouldnt "god" have made them in his image and not us? Perhaps we were an afterthought or a backup plan?

 

Interesting topic.