9/11 Karma ?

[Accip74 7,112]

 

Larry Silverstien talking about the collapse of wtc7.

 

John Kerry said when asked about the collapse of wtc7 ".......it was done in a controlled way"

 

Any plausible explanation for these contradictions to the official report?

 

I mean obviously they're mistaken (haha), but why?

Edited September 14, 2015 by Accip74

[Francie 6,368]

Yeah how did they just pull it, an if so they can't be trusted on the towers either, how many billions did he insure it for before the collaspe,

[Accip74 7,112]

Yeah how did they just pull it, an if so they can't be trusted on the towers either, how many billions did he insure it for before the collaspe,

I don't know mate, I'm just pointing out there's some use of basic English, that in all honestly can be interpreted how you want, especially if you're a mad conspiracist haha.......but it doesn't compute as 'structural failing' to me...

[CushtyJook 1,097]

image.jpg

Larry Silverstien talking about the collapse of wtc7.

John Kerry said when asked about the collapse of wtc7 ".......it was done in a controlled way"

Any plausible explanation for these contradictions to the official report?

I mean obviously they're mistaken (haha), but why?

In all fairnous this one is easy explainable they said pull it as in pull out the firemen and get out the building not pull it for explosives you think they would go to the effort of rigging it up with explosives which would of been done prior to attacks then admit to everyone they where going to pull it

[CushtyJook 1,097]

In fact watch this video

 

 

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=43F54hR0NW8

Edited September 14, 2015 by CushtyJook

[Accip74 7,112]

 

image.jpg

Larry Silverstien talking about the collapse of wtc7.

John Kerry said when asked about the collapse of wtc7 ".......it was done in a controlled way"

Any plausible explanation for these contradictions to the official report?

I mean obviously they're mistaken (haha), but why?

In all fairnous this one is easy explainable they said pull it as in pull out the firemen and get out the building not pull it for explosives you think they would go to the effort of rigging it up with explosives which would of been done prior to attacks then admit to everyone they where going to pull it

Yes it can easily be interpreted that way, but John Kerry doesn't use the same words or in the same context......

It's worth saying that wtc7 apparently was never mentioned in the original nist report on 9/11........after the towers, one of the biggest buildings in America & only one of 3 steel structure buildings in the world to collapse from fire (the other 2 being the towers) wasn't worth a mention??

Edited September 14, 2015 by Accip74

[CushtyJook 1,097]

 

 

image.jpg

Larry Silverstien talking about the collapse of wtc7.

John Kerry said when asked about the collapse of wtc7 ".......it was done in a controlled way"

Any plausible explanation for these contradictions to the official report?

I mean obviously they're mistaken (haha), but why?

In all fairnous this one is easy explainable they said pull it as in pull out the firemen and get out the building not pull it for explosives you think they would go to the effort of rigging it up with explosives which would of been done prior to attacks then admit to everyone they where going to pull it

Yes it can easily be interpreted that way, but John Kerry doesn't use the same words or in the same context......

It's worth saying that wtc7 apparently was never mentioned in the original nist report on 9/11........after the towers, one of the biggest buildings in America & only one of 3 steel structure buildings in the world to collapse from fire wasn't worth a mention??

Please watch the video i posted as it explains it far better than me I still belive 911 was dodgy however this pull it thing is nonsense no demolition companies use it and right at the end of the short video you will see firemen using the word pull to mean getting out of danger area tell me what you think after video

 

[Accip74 7,112]

Anyway.......I'll stop there, we know these sites are watched by the authorities & I'm sure I've just seen a blacked out limo cruise slowly past my house....haha....

Edited September 14, 2015 by Accip74

[Accip74 7,112]

 

 

 

image.jpg

Larry Silverstien talking about the collapse of wtc7.

John Kerry said when asked about the collapse of wtc7 ".......it was done in a controlled way"

Any plausible explanation for these contradictions to the official report?

I mean obviously they're mistaken (haha), but why?

In all fairnous this one is easy explainable they said pull it as in pull out the firemen and get out the building not pull it for explosives you think they would go to the effort of rigging it up with explosives which would of been done prior to attacks then admit to everyone they where going to pull it

Yes it can easily be interpreted that way, but John Kerry doesn't use the same words or in the same context......

It's worth saying that wtc7 apparently was never mentioned in the original nist report on 9/11........after the towers, one of the biggest buildings in America & only one of 3 steel structure buildings in the world to collapse from fire wasn't worth a mention??

Please watch the video i posted as it explains it far better than me I still belive 911 was dodgy however this pull it thing is nonsense no demolition companies use it and right at the end of the short video you will see firemen using the word pull to mean getting out of danger area tell me what you think after video

I've seen it mate cheers

[CushtyJook 1,097]

 

 

 

 

image.jpg

Larry Silverstien talking about the collapse of wtc7.

John Kerry said when asked about the collapse of wtc7 ".......it was done in a controlled way"

Any plausible explanation for these contradictions to the official report?

I mean obviously they're mistaken (haha), but why?

In all fairnous this one is easy explainable they said pull it as in pull out the firemen and get out the building not pull it for explosives you think they would go to the effort of rigging it up with explosives which would of been done prior to attacks then admit to everyone they where going to pull it

Yes it can easily be interpreted that way, but John Kerry doesn't use the same words or in the same context......

It's worth saying that wtc7 apparently was never mentioned in the original nist report on 9/11........after the towers, one of the biggest buildings in America & only one of 3 steel structure buildings in the world to collapse from fire wasn't worth a mention??

Please watch the video i posted as it explains it far better than me I still belive 911 was dodgy however this pull it thing is nonsense no demolition companies use it and right at the end of the short video you will see firemen using the word pull to mean getting out of danger area tell me what you think after video

I've seen it mate cheers

Well what do you think

[Born Hunter 17,909]

 

It's worth saying that wtc7 apparently was never mentioned in the original nist report on 9/11........after the towers, one of the biggest buildings in America & only one of 3 steel structure buildings in the world to collapse from fire (the other 2 being the towers) wasn't worth a mention??

 

 

Are you sure about that?

 

Didn't the FEMA report finding the cause of the collapse inconclusive lead to the more substantial NIST investigation being authorised?

 

http://www.nist.gov/el/disasterstudies/wtc/wtc_meetings.cfm

[Accip74 7,112]

 

It's worth saying that wtc7 apparently was never mentioned in the original nist report on 9/11........after the towers, one of the biggest buildings in America & only one of 3 steel structure buildings in the world to collapse from fire (the other 2 being the towers) wasn't worth a mention??

 

Are you sure about that?

 

Didn't the FEMA report finding the cause of the collapse inconclusive lead to the more substantial NIST investigation being authorised?

 

http://www.nist.gov/el/disasterstudies/wtc/wtc_meetings.cfm

Apparently in the initial report, I'm denying is wasn't reported on at all Edited September 14, 2015 by Accip74

[Accip74 7,112]

 

 

 

 

 

image.jpg

Larry Silverstien talking about the collapse of wtc7.

John Kerry said when asked about the collapse of wtc7 ".......it was done in a controlled way"

Any plausible explanation for these contradictions to the official report?

I mean obviously they're mistaken (haha), but why?

In all fairnous this one is easy explainable they said pull it as in pull out the firemen and get out the building not pull it for explosives you think they would go to the effort of rigging it up with explosives which would of been done prior to attacks then admit to everyone they where going to pull it

Yes it can easily be interpreted that way, but John Kerry doesn't use the same words or in the same context......

It's worth saying that wtc7 apparently was never mentioned in the original nist report on 9/11........after the towers, one of the biggest buildings in America & only one of 3 steel structure buildings in the world to collapse from fire wasn't worth a mention??

Please watch the video i posted as it explains it far better than me I still belive 911 was dodgy however this pull it thing is nonsense no demolition companies use it and right at the end of the short video you will see firemen using the word pull to mean getting out of danger area tell me what you think after video

I've seen it mate cheers

Well what do you think

Meant to say I've seen it before & had same conclusion, but John Kerry's words seemed more telling, which threw silversteins words into doubt.........like I say, interpreted as you will Edited September 14, 2015 by Accip74

[Born Hunter 17,909]

 

 

It's worth saying that wtc7 apparently was never mentioned in the original nist report on 9/11........after the towers, one of the biggest buildings in America & only one of 3 steel structure buildings in the world to collapse from fire (the other 2 being the towers) wasn't worth a mention??

Are you sure about that?

 

Didn't the FEMA report finding the cause of the collapse inconclusive lead to the more substantial NIST investigation being authorised?

 

http://www.nist.gov/el/disasterstudies/wtc/wtc_meetings.cfm

Apparently in the initial report, I'm denying is was reported on

 

 

Okay, well I'm not going to waste my days looking into it so I'll take your word for it in good faith. Following on from that, my next thought is 'so what?'..... It didn't go un-investigated or unreported. So what if the initial report concentrated exclusively on the primary events of that attack? It's not like WTC7 was covered up.

[Accip74 7,112]

 

 

 

It's worth saying that wtc7 apparently was never mentioned in the original nist report on 9/11........after the towers, one of the biggest buildings in America & only one of 3 steel structure buildings in the world to collapse from fire (the other 2 being the towers) wasn't worth a mention??

 

Are you sure about that?

 

Didn't the FEMA report finding the cause of the collapse inconclusive lead to the more substantial NIST investigation being authorised?

http://www.nist.gov/el/disasterstudies/wtc/wtc_meetings.cfm

Apparently in the initial report, I'm denying is was reported on

Okay, well I'm not going to waste my days looking into it so I'll take your word for it in good faith. Following on from that, my next thought is 'so what?'..... It didn't go un-investigated or unreported. So what if the initial report concentrated exclusively on the primary events of that attack? It's not like WTC7 was covered up.

Believe me mate I'm not wasting much time on this either, I'm not an infowars kind of guy haha.......I'm just talking shite in the general section, but I do have strong doubts about details, always have & probably always will.....

'So what?' Good question.......If the towers hadn't of come down, & only wtc7 did, that's still one of the biggest buildings in America brought down by terrorism......a massive historical event in its own right, worthy of a mention I would of thought.....but like many things, I could be wrong about that......

Edited September 14, 2015 by Accip74