marshman 7,758 Posted January 28, 2015 Report Share Posted January 28, 2015 Four children by three different men, made a fortune from being a whore and still claiming benefits ( even though legally she can ) . She's no different from some low life estate slag only difference she's got more money . I'd say there's one fairly big difference. She works for a living instead of living off of the state. Claiming the benefit she is entitled to is more of a tax rebate imo. If every estate slag paid as much tax as Katie Price the country would be a much better place. She ain't exactly marriage material or a perfect role model but I don't think I'd put her in the same bracket as the others you are referring to. a bit of a assumption that estate slags don't work mate , so she works for a living how does that make her any different from some estate slag that does works ? Only difference she's got more money , all the money she's got cant buy class ! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DogFox123 1,379 Posted January 28, 2015 Report Share Posted January 28, 2015 Four children by three different men, made a fortune from being a whore and still claiming benefits ( even though legally she can ) . She's no different from some low life estate slag only difference she's got more money . I'd say there's one fairly big difference. She works for a living instead of living off of the state. Claiming the benefit she is entitled to is more of a tax rebate imo. If every estate slag paid as much tax as Katie Price the country would be a much better place. She ain't exactly marriage material or a perfect role model but I don't think I'd put her in the same bracket as the others you are referring to. a bit of a assumption that estate slags don't work mate , so she works for a living how does that make her any different from some estate slag that does works ? Only difference she's got more money , all the money she's got cant buy class ! What's that got to do with the point of the opening post though? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
lukey 1,621 Posted January 28, 2015 Report Share Posted January 28, 2015 Four children by three different men, made a fortune from being a whore and still claiming benefits ( even though legally she can ) . She's no different from some low life estate slag only difference she's got more money . I'd say there's one fairly big difference. She works for a living instead of living off of the state. Claiming the benefit she is entitled to is more of a tax rebate imo. If every estate slag paid as much tax as Katie Price the country would be a much better place. She ain't exactly marriage material or a perfect role model but I don't think I'd put her in the same bracket as the others you are referring to. a bit of a assumption that estate slags don't work mate , so she works for a living how does that make her any different from some estate slag that does works ? Only difference she's got more money , all the money she's got cant buy class ! Can't see what your getting at here? Her boy is disabled and gets the support he needs through tax payers including his own mother n father! If you were in that position and it was either going to cost you a fraction of that let's say £150 a week or you were entitled to it through the government you trying to say you would put your hands up and say Na il catch this? 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Born Hunter 17,907 Posted January 28, 2015 Report Share Posted January 28, 2015 Four children by three different men, made a fortune from being a whore and still claiming benefits ( even though legally she can ) . She's no different from some low life estate slag only difference she's got more money . I'd say there's one fairly big difference. She works for a living instead of living off of the state. Claiming the benefit she is entitled to is more of a tax rebate imo. If every estate slag paid as much tax as Katie Price the country would be a much better place. She ain't exactly marriage material or a perfect role model but I don't think I'd put her in the same bracket as the others you are referring to. a bit of a assumption that estate slags don't work mate , so she works for a living how does that make her any different from some estate slag that does works ? Only difference she's got more money , all the money she's got cant buy class ! Sorry, I thought there was the implication that estate slags live off benefits brought in from their wealth of children. If they pay their own way and claim what ever benefits they're entitled to, then she isn't any different in that respect... though neither am I. How she behaves in her personal life is her own business so I'll not comment on that. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
marshman 7,758 Posted January 28, 2015 Report Share Posted January 28, 2015 Four children by three different men, made a fortune from being a whore and still claiming benefits ( even though legally she can ) . She's no different from some low life estate slag only difference she's got more money . I'd say there's one fairly big difference. She works for a living instead of living off of the state. Claiming the benefit she is entitled to is more of a tax rebate imo. If every estate slag paid as much tax as Katie Price the country would be a much better place. She ain't exactly marriage material or a perfect role model but I don't think I'd put her in the same bracket as the others you are referring to. a bit of a assumption that estate slags don't work mate , so she works for a living how does that make her any different from some estate slag that does works ? Only difference she's got more money , all the money she's got cant buy class !What's that got to do with the point of the opening post though? nothing to do with it whatsoever just ranting about a person I don't like ! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
marshman 7,758 Posted January 28, 2015 Report Share Posted January 28, 2015 (edited) Four children by three different men, made a fortune from being a whore and still claiming benefits ( even though legally she can ) . She's no different from some low life estate slag only difference she's got more money . I'd say there's one fairly big difference. She works for a living instead of living off of the state. Claiming the benefit she is entitled to is more of a tax rebate imo. If every estate slag paid as much tax as Katie Price the country would be a much better place. She ain't exactly marriage material or a perfect role model but I don't think I'd put her in the same bracket as the others you are referring to. a bit of a assumption that estate slags don't work mate , so she works for a living how does that make her any different from some estate slag that does works ? Only difference she's got more money , all the money she's got cant buy class !Can't see what your getting at here? Her boy is disabled and gets the support he needs through tax payers including his own mother n father! If you were in that position and it was either going to cost you a fraction of that let's say £150 a week or you were entitled to it through the government you trying to say you would put your hands up and say Na il catch this? I never said she's not entitled to it Or that I wouldn't take it . again I'm just ranting about someone I don't like Edited January 28, 2015 by marshman Quote Link to post Share on other sites
j j m 6,609 Posted January 28, 2015 Report Share Posted January 28, 2015 why shouldnt she claim it ,she pays her taxes and works not like half the foreigners we give houses to and pay there rent ,and support there kids and everything else we do for them,good on her 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
marshman 7,758 Posted January 28, 2015 Report Share Posted January 28, 2015 Four children by three different men, made a fortune from being a whore and still claiming benefits ( even though legally she can ) . She's no different from some low life estate slag only difference she's got more money . I'd say there's one fairly big difference. She works for a living instead of living off of the state. Claiming the benefit she is entitled to is more of a tax rebate imo. If every estate slag paid as much tax as Katie Price the country would be a much better place. She ain't exactly marriage material or a perfect role model but I don't think I'd put her in the same bracket as the others you are referring to. a bit of a assumption that estate slags don't work mate , so she works for a living how does that make her any different from some estate slag that does works ? Only difference she's got more money , all the money she's got cant buy class ! Sorry, I thought there was the implication that estate slags live off benefits brought in from their wealth of children. If they pay their own way and claim what ever benefits they're entitled to, then she isn't any different in that respect... though neither am I. How she behaves in her personal life is her own business so I'll not comment on that. like I said " the only difference is she's got more money " Quote Link to post Share on other sites
The Seeker 3,048 Posted January 28, 2015 Report Share Posted January 28, 2015 If there are 190 school days in a year and we assume the report is correct of a grand a day then that's £190,000 per year You could employ 3/4 people full time and pay for a vehicle for that, why are the benifits system paying this to taxi companies? And how many others are in the same boat claiming similar benefit? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
marshman 7,758 Posted January 28, 2015 Report Share Posted January 28, 2015 (edited) If there are 190 school days in a year and we assume the report is correct of a grand a day then that's £190,000 per year. You could employ 3/4 people full time and pay for a vehicle for that, why are the benifits system paying this to taxi companies? And how many others are in the same boat claiming similar benefit? you can bet your bottom dollar that the taxi driver isn't paid a grand a day. Edited January 28, 2015 by marshman Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DogFox123 1,379 Posted January 28, 2015 Report Share Posted January 28, 2015 If there are 190 school days in a year and we assume the report is correct of a grand a day then that's £190,000 per year You could employ 3/4 people full time and pay for a vehicle for that, why are the benifits system paying this to taxi companies? And how many others are in the same boat claiming similar benefit? This is completely absurd if this is the case, I don't believe those costs at all. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
lukey 1,621 Posted January 28, 2015 Report Share Posted January 28, 2015 She said it would cost her a grand per day to do it 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DogFox123 1,379 Posted January 28, 2015 Report Share Posted January 28, 2015 She said it would cost her a grand per day to do it Well I'm going to personally write to her, I'll drive her kid to school, hoover her house and sort out her knicker drawer for £800 a day and I'm deadly serious.... 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
marshman 7,758 Posted January 28, 2015 Report Share Posted January 28, 2015 She said it would cost her a grand per day to do itWell I'm going to personally write to her, I'll drive her kid to school, hoover her house and sort out her knicker drawer for £800 a day and I'm deadly serious.... i bet you'd love to get into her knicker draw lol ?. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
lukey 1,621 Posted January 28, 2015 Report Share Posted January 28, 2015 Fair play then, you'll need to spend a few years learning how to look after a disabled kid and have a carer there with you aswell. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.