Accip74 7,112 Posted December 7, 2014 Report Share Posted December 7, 2014 Would mind BH being in my team on The Chase but f**k sitting next to him in the pub...lol You think he actually goes to the pub? I reckon he's like Rainman and doesn't talk in person... ......& only fly's with quantas... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Born Hunter 17,642 Posted December 7, 2014 Report Share Posted December 7, 2014 LOL I don't think I talk about this stuff in real life, only when someone sets me off. Blame Wilf this time! 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
frazdog 252 Posted December 8, 2014 Report Share Posted December 8, 2014 could you explain the inverse square law wilf,cheers interesting lol Quote Link to post Share on other sites
WILF 44,419 Posted December 8, 2014 Report Share Posted December 8, 2014 Can I f**k, it was over 20 years ago I was sat in a classroom doing it all mate !! Lol lol Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Born Hunter 17,642 Posted December 8, 2014 Report Share Posted December 8, 2014 (edited) Do I dare to..........? lol Edited December 8, 2014 by Born Hunter Quote Link to post Share on other sites
frazdog 252 Posted December 8, 2014 Report Share Posted December 8, 2014 yes bh,you know you want to lol Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Born Hunter 17,642 Posted December 8, 2014 Report Share Posted December 8, 2014 Well the pretending not to be a geek horse has f***ing bolted so why not. lol Inverse square law is the mathematical relationship between flux/count rate/radiation intensity and distance from the radioactive source. It mathematically shows that by doubling the distance from the source causes the count rate/intensity to drop by the square of that (a factor of 4!). So simply, if you are getting hit by 100 gammas per second at 1m, stepping back to 2m will reduce that count rate to 25 gammas per second. So you can see how understanding this principle is useful in radiation safety. It's based on simple spherical geometry and assumes a point like source and is of course statistical in nature because we are dealing with radioactive decay, which is random. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
frazdog 252 Posted December 8, 2014 Report Share Posted December 8, 2014 aw happy days bh,so with everyone agreeing years ago that the universe is not static,that it is expanding from its beginnings,what would happen if you used the inverse square law,for our solar system,no wait our moon even,what would happen? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Born Hunter 17,642 Posted December 8, 2014 Report Share Posted December 8, 2014 (edited) What the f**k are you going on about.... why does everything have to be about god with you. Edited December 8, 2014 by Born Hunter Quote Link to post Share on other sites
frazdog 252 Posted December 8, 2014 Report Share Posted December 8, 2014 jeez bh you look down to many microscopes today lol I never mentioned god ya madman haha I was just asking what would happen to our solar system,universe if you applied that law. calm your hormones im taljing science here lol Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Born Hunter 17,642 Posted December 8, 2014 Report Share Posted December 8, 2014 LOL, you don't even believe the big bang theory so don't try and kid me you weren't working your way to that. Cosmic Background Radiation is what would happen. What relevance that has I don't know. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.