Got cought speeding

[secretagentmole 1,701]

Er the Chief Constable fo somewhere got off one of these because he said he could not remember who was driving... That was in court as well, so precedent set! Not to mention Christine Hamilton...

Edited April 28, 2012 by secretagentmole

[mickmck 716]

I'd say it was TWOC'd, inform them you're officially reporting a crime, then it's up to them to prove who had the car in the first place.

you crook

[PlasticJock 539]

I'd say it was TWOC'd, inform them you're officially reporting a crime, then it's up to them to prove who had the car in the first place.

you crook

 

Thing is mate, if it was a laser one then fair enough as long as it had been calibrated, but the radar ones are notorious for locking onto anything around you - and that was a police sergeant who admitted it in a court case a few months back.

Then there was the 2 coppers up here who got a reading of over 300mph, only to find out it had been tracking a low flying fighter jet

[mickmck 716]

I'd say it was TWOC'd, inform them you're officially reporting a crime, then it's up to them to prove who had the car in the first place.

you crook

 

Thing is mate, if it was a laser one then fair enough as long as it had been calibrated, but the radar ones are notorious for locking onto anything around you - and that was a police sergeant who admitted it in a court case a few months back.

Then there was the 2 coppers up here who got a reading of over 300mph, only to find out it had been tracking a low flying fighter jet

if you can get away with it im all for it , but them fcukers dont often let that happen , i got pulled in my truck and it was impounded as they said i had the wrong insurance , it cost me £230 to get my truck back . i put a complaint in and after fcukinig about for 2 month the copper that dealt with it told me to put reciptes in and i would get my money back I DIDNT GET A PENNY . i thought it was to good to be true i wouldnt trust them , never have and never will

[trappa 518]

I'd say it was TWOC'd, inform them you're officially reporting a crime, then it's up to them to prove who had the car in the first place.

you crook

 

Thing is mate, if it was a laser one then fair enough as long as it had been calibrated, but the radar ones are notorious for locking onto anything around you - and that was a police sergeant who admitted it in a court case a few months back.

Then there was the 2 coppers up here who got a reading of over 300mph, only to find out it had been tracking a low flying fighter jet

http://jokideo.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Speeding-ticket-to-a-NATO-Tornado-fighter.jpg

 

This one???

[PlasticJock 539]

I'd say it was TWOC'd, inform them you're officially reporting a crime, then it's up to them to prove who had the car in the first place.

you crook

 

Thing is mate, if it was a laser one then fair enough as long as it had been calibrated, but the radar ones are notorious for locking onto anything around you - and that was a police sergeant who admitted it in a court case a few months back.

Then there was the 2 coppers up here who got a reading of over 300mph, only to find out it had been tracking a low flying fighter jet

http://jokideo.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Speeding-ticket-to-a-NATO-Tornado-fighter.jpg

 

This one???

 

Yep

Shame the pilot was quick enough to stop the missile launch

 

End of the day, the law relies on the inability of most to launch a legal challenge, either financially or otherwise.

[colint5 47]

doing over 100 isnt always a ban, FACT !!. l was caught doing 103 mph ( i know its not big and its not clever) and ended up with 6 points and £300 fine. Although, i dare say if you were doing 110 say, well i think it would be bye bye license.

[MAACCY 105]

Thanks for that Colin did you just receive the fine or did you have to take it up in court and was that a manned camera

[Rake aboot 4,936]

If you was doing that speed you deserve to be banned as only a retard would risk not only his life but the life of his passenger and any one else on the motorway at that time .

 

Idiot.

 

The actual speed has no reflection on safety, It is the speed in relation to the conditions. 30mph in a 50 zone round a wet roundabout may be unsafe and even stupid and reckless . Whereas 160 on a dry motorway with no junctions in a suitable car is perfectly safe.

 

It`s fool like you who give all these "speed kills" idiots the oxygen they need.

[B.P.R 2,798]

http://www.speedingsolicitor.co.uk/index.php

 

 

[MAACCY 105]

Thanks rake aboot and veedublee some good information on there

[henarchchar 64]

WHO WOULD BE PROSECUTED IF BOTH PEOPLE IN THE CAR BLAMED EACH OTHER WOULD THIS NOT GIVE REASONABLE DOUBT, ITS JUST A THOUGHT

[the_stig 6,614]

WHO WOULD BE PROSECUTED IF BOTH PEOPLE IN THE CAR BLAMED EACH OTHER WOULD THIS NOT GIVE REASONABLE DOUBT, ITS JUST A THOUGHT

the name on the log book ..

[j j m 6,606]

id argue the toss mate

[Chid 6,717]

If you was doing that speed you deserve to be banned as only a retard would risk not only his life but the life of his passenger and any one else on the motorway at that time .

 

Idiot.

 

The actual speed has no reflection on safety, It is the speed in relation to the conditions. 30mph in a 50 zone round a wet roundabout may be unsafe and even stupid and reckless . Whereas 160 on a dry motorway with no junctions in a suitable car is perfectly safe.

 

It`s fool like you who give all these "speed kills" idiots the oxygen they need.

 

I beg to differ . Unless you know how to drive right (by that I mean advanced driving and doing high speeds on tracks ect) you should be banned and fined heavy for breaking the 100 mph .

 

Speed and inexperience are what kills and why any one really needs to go that fast is beyond me