Jump to content

neems

Members
  • Content Count

    4,005
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by neems

  1. Yeah,you southern mincers lead the way in terms of manliness
  2. He could make a few £100,000 out of this if he played his cards right imo
  3. And my point is when you have a very destructive group,that not only doesn't help the cause,but actively sets it back 'demonising' that group is fine. In fact it's essential. Unity is a fallacy,we see it on the left but it's an illusion,SWP,labour,UAF etc are all just different heads of the same marxist dragon.
  4. If say Nick Griffin joined UKIP it would harm UKIP,he'd be one of the more intelligent,better educated and most experienced members but they would lose votes. So leave them to it,support and vote for them if you want,but they're not for you. The 'right' has been demonised,that's why a serious organisation needs to be very selective about who it lets represent it.
  5. No,the state is trying to bring in more laws against 'hate speech' and right to assembly,these daft marches garner support for those laws. the average person who has no real political inclination will support whoever brings in laws to stop people trashing/shutting down towns,rioting outside their homes and generally being hooligans.
  6. Not if that something was marching,it's not realistic to think everyone needs to do something,but it's not necessary either. I'd rather have 10 intelligent and experienced nationalists knocking on peoples doors and winning people over than a rabble of 15,000 on the streets wrecking town and fighting with muslims.
  7. Get in with the right people and helped out how I know,but doing nothing is far better than the completely counter productive act of marching around with a load of drunks in tow shouting at Muslims and trashing town centres. The public will never get behind that,they won't learn anything from that,no law will then be passed in our favour so what's the point?
  8. A bunch of naive young men held a demo that caused chaos in liverpool about a month back,now it looks like the fat little creature,Joe Anderson will get the power to ban any marches he wants. Now if marching ever became effective it wouldn't be a tool we could use,communists and anarchists could though. Marching on the streets does nothing,achieves nothing as of now,everyone knows the score,who are we informing? And do we want the biased media to control what 99.99% of the public sees of said march (on television or the internet)?
  9. What was the endgame of the EDL? March around chanting,and then...? Everyone knows the problems we have today,there's no need at all to spread awareness,all that does is cause petty confrontation and waste time and energy,there are political parties to get behind for now and bigger things in the works.
  10. Understand and aggree with wat your saying though both groups have put pressure on rotherham that imho have made certain that certain individuals in the of case could no longer be employed by the council in very well paid jobs due to their incompetance highlighted by these groups. A lot of people got big payouts though,and some were re-hired when things died down. A 1 issue pressure group doesn't have much influence,walking around with flags and pressing 'like' on facebook does nothing.
  11. Britain First is about as 'far right' as the EDL,900,000 facebook likes and how many votes? Just a safety valve,a good place to blow off steam for young men while making nationalism look dangerous and unelectable,imagine asking Goldstein his opinions on foreign policy or the NHS for example. They just turn what should be a serious debate into a petty argument on the street.
  12. Sports evolved as a way for men to test who was best. And that would give them status and so attract women (why do you think the original olympians competed naked?) which I think is the reason most people hate cheaters in sport. they're probably not of the best genetic stock but still get the all the glory\status and will have a disproportionate impact on the gene pool,meaning it'll be weaker than had the better man won. Just a random theory from the mind of neems But even ignoring that,I dont think we should have a culture where potentially very damaging drugs are accepted
  13. Denying it off hand is burying your head in the sand. It might not fit in with your version of reality,but people from different ethnic and cultural groups generally don't get on unless they're forced to. The fact is,it's probably in that mans best interest he wasn't on display in uniform in public,especially if the area's 'diverse'. Not long ago a British soldier was identified by 2 orcs because of his clothing,walking through London,he was run over and beheaded. Remember that?
  14. It won't stop,this is what cultural marxism is all about,the decay of our values and sense of national pride.
  15. Why would zionists criticise the migrants? Do you think they want Europe to reject them? First find out the Agenda of Neo conservatists (zionists ) then consider their agenda and how they attempt with some degree of success to manipulate political and financial stability, taking every opportunity to create instability . Radicals in Islam and their warped ideologies are a source of great concern around the world this is not only a concern to non muslims it is also a great concern to Genuine Muslims who are not rapists drug dealers and terorrists as a minority like to portray, I am my
  16. Defending yourself and your property is fine,if you word everything properly you'll often get away with a lot imo. But setting traps is a different ball game,it sets a dangerous precedent,if one person gets away with it the next will push it furtheruntil we all have spike pits and landmines in our gardens. but when it all went wrong and an innocent gets hurt the media particularly would be looking for someone to blame,the police and certainly the judge doesnt want to be the one who goes on record as setting the precedent of letting others get away with man traps imo
  17. Why would zionists criticise the migrants? Do you think they want Europe to reject them?
  18. Schools over there are bringing in new uniform rules,meaning the young girls have to wear long skirts to preven 'misunderstandings' with migrants.
  19. Between this stunt and Monty Python the Russians and Eastern Euros must think we have a very unusual sense of humour...
  20. losing,not lost,the tide is turning all over the world we're just reacting a bitslower. The public have short memories,and are bombarded by media preaching a suicidal message from birth,you can't blame them. I think you'll taste some real oppression in your life time
  21. You can only use reasonable force to arrest someone,but if/when it comes to having to defend yourself (they'll probably attack you to escape) you do not need to weigh up to a nicety how much force you use. i.e he punches you and tries to follow up and you hit him before his second shot lands and he ends up in bits on the floor,you should still be fine.
  22. The 'leftist' groups are huge in this country compared to nationalist ones,and far more violent,deny that your groups are protected all you want,I've seen it and heard it from the horses mouth so to speak. 1-0,2-0,3-0....etc mean anything to you? Im sure such a prominent organiser such as yourself knows exactly what I'm talking about. They are also unimpeded in their political goals,they don't get arrested for leafleting,their families don't get targeted by their opponents,their homes don't get raided for speaking in public. It's as clear as day we are on the losing side atm a
  23. A bit like Mayweather ducking everyone and being a c**t to generate interest,Fury acts like an embarassing retard to generate interest.
  24. I'd agree that speaking up is doing something, if you weren't all speaking up on a forum populated with people that share your views. Not going to recruit anyone to your side preaching to the converted, you need to get out there on the streets In the dystopia that is Britain 2015 voicing an opinion that involves putting your own people first is called hate speech,which in turn means you're labelled waycist,which is something like being called a witch in the 1700's. Im not as articulate as Paul Weston for example,I'd be surprised if anyone here is,without hiring a solicitor to follow
  25. I'd agree that speaking up is doing something, if you weren't all speaking up on a forum populated with people that share your views. Not going to recruit anyone to your side preaching to the converted, you need to get out there on the streets In the dystopia that is Britain 2015 voicing an opinion that involves putting your own people first is called hate speech,which in turn means you're labelled waycist,which is something like being called a witch in the 1700's. Im not as articulate as Paul Weston for example,I'd be surprised if anyone here is,without hiring a solicitor to foll
×
×
  • Create New...