Jump to content

DogFox123

Members
  • Content Count

    4,355
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by DogFox123

  1. there used to be few good old staff lines in the black country, few years back tug the 1x staff x grey came from them lines and he was a brill dog a few lads seen him work . But most now are just show stuff . and with the price of staffs today , so alot of show stuff being bred , but people who want proper performance bred bull terrier, will look else where, and always have done , as you say use the best tool for the job . Tbh Bird the Staff has always been a show dog right from the start. That's not to say that they haven't worked over the years.Got to disagree with you there.http:
  2. there used to be few good old staff lines in the black country, few years back tug the 1x staff x grey came from them lines and he was a brill dog a few lads seen him work . But most now are just show stuff . and with the price of staffs today , so alot of show stuff being bred , but people who want proper performance bred bull terrier, will look else where, and always have done , as you say use the best tool for the job . Tbh Bird the Staff has always been a show dog right from the start. That's not to say that they haven't worked over the years.Got to disagree with you there.http:
  3. there used to be few good old staff lines in the black country, few years back tug the 1x staff x grey came from them lines and he was a brill dog a few lads seen him work . But most now are just show stuff . and with the price of staffs today , so alot of show stuff being bred , but people who want proper performance bred bull terrier, will look else where, and always have done , as you say use the best tool for the job . Tbh Bird the Staff has always been a show dog right from the start. That's not to say that they haven't worked over the years.
  4. DogFox123

    York

    Brilliant place, yes we've done a lot of hunting in places near York. Pre-ban and all that.....
  5. As an ex boxer I can't believe Gnasher doesn't rate Tyson and his technical brilliance. He was severely lacking in height and reach and used amazing skills to basically clear out the division. Although his highlight knockouts and combinations were stunning the most impressive part of his game was his defence.
  6. I tell you what i,ll keep it nice and simple for you......Golovkin was naturally the bigger man on the Monday before the fight.....he was naturally the bigger man on the Tuesday before the fight.....the Wednesday,Thursday,Friday.......and yes you guessed it he was also the naturally bigger man in the ring on Saturday.....as he will also be the naturally bigger man next week next month and next year..............and Roberts your fathers brother As for who is the biggest expert with the most knowledge....i really couldnt care less like i already said i dont feel a man should have to say " ive
  7. DogFox123

    God

    Nar mate I'm a size twelve ya little bugger... is that bra size or shoe aize Dik size.... around....
  8. DogFox123

    God

    Nar mate I'm a size twelve ya little bugger...
  9. DogFox123

    God

    Just come out then and be done with it ya gret cawk smoker....This f****n guy again. He only 14 mate mind the languageTake it you're his bum chum.... ?
  10. DogFox123

    God

    Just come out then and be done with it ya gret cawk smoker....
  11. Its worth a look mate.Some very clever people invovled in the space game. They figured out to use gravity alone from each planet to sling shot the pair of satelites to the next planet and so on. Voyager 2. is 11 billion miles away and been going for 35yrs at 10 miles a second.1 woman said at that speed it will take 40k yrs to reach the nearest star. How the feck they work all that stuff out really amazing. Although there's almost certainly intelligent life out there chances are we will never make contact with them because the distances between the planets are so astronomical. The distanc
  12. Its worth a look mate.Some very clever people invovled in the space game. They figured out to use gravity alone from each planet to sling shot the pair of satelites to the next planet and so on. Voyager 2. is 11 billion miles away and been going for 35yrs at 10 miles a second.1 woman said at that speed it will take 40k yrs to reach the nearest star. How the feck they work all that stuff out really amazing. Although there's almost certainly intelligent life out there chances are we will never make contact with them because the distances between the planets are so astronomical.
  13. It is pretty impressive that on occasion you will get a handy Bull Terrier as they are and always have been a show dog.
  14. You said Brook was the bigger man in the ring " in terms of boxing ".........now correct me if im wrong but boxing takes place in a ring.........and you are now saying Golovkin was naturally the bigger man in the ring..............do you watch The Tweenies ? So you consider yourself " better " than them because you do the research ?..........do you have a subscription to Boxing Monthly by any chance ? no your just trying too hard now. I'll say it again for the millionth time, Brook was the "bigger" man at the weigh-in and at the check weigh-in. In boxing terms who would be the bigger
  15. If you enjoy watching girls bickering more than watching the telly then get rid of your telly....or dont its up to you. no i dont hang around school playgrounds ....do you ?......to me to you to me to you. Yes he did mate....not sure id call it " training " as such but the gym was made available to him privately......as it has been for many foreign fighters. chuckle-brother-502624.jpg Oh dear oh dear....
  16. Seriously though I don't think James Degale is a big enough reason to move up in weight even though GGG would win, I doubt fighting him is going to catapult his legacy. Golovkin isn't a big Middleweight, he makes weight fine. I don't get the obsession for fighters to move up in weight, Hagler didn't do it and neither did Monzon.
  17. Are you typing in a tunnel in a tunnel??? ?
  18. Could be a long night again, like Ali vs Frazier......
  19. Wowee, I boxed in amateurs as a teenager, ran for Yorkshire and was in the academy for Barnsley FC. That doesn't automatically mean I'm an expert on all these subjects does it? If that's the case then only the best fighters would be the best boxing trainers but that ain't the case. Adam Booth is a recent example of this, i can name many more. Adam Booth was a very good amateur and barring injury would probably have made a decent level pro.......just saying like.There you go again Gnasher you scallywag you, at it again. You missed the "best fighters" part....
  20. Wait so now Golovkin was the naturally bigger man in the ring f****n roll on ! You said im an expert not me......i tend to think you can spot genuine knowledge without needing to say things like " ive forgot more about fighting than you will ever know " like some do Speaking of fooling part timers......for the umpteenth time of asking please explain the difference between a part time fan and a full time fan....and which category do you fall into ? I've always said Golovkin is the naturally bigger man, never said otherwise. I said Brook was the bigger man at the weigh-in and at the c
  21. How often do anglers get demanded to justify their photographs and continued legality? Every single picture from a trophy hunt in the public eye will be met with hate, threats, sensational explanations to the reasons why and demands for justification. When/if anglers ever do I fully expect them to use similar examples from other activities to help explain their motivation behind their fish photos. It's a fairly standard debating tactic to use one generally acceptable act to justify another technically similar act. I see nothing wrong with what he did myself. I don't agree with trophy hunting
  22. How often do anglers get demanded to justify their photographs and continued legality? Every single picture from a trophy hunt in the public eye will be met with hate, threats, sensational explanations to the reasons why and demands for justification. When/if anglers ever do I fully expect them to use similar examples from other activities to help explain their motivation behind their fish photos. It's a fairly standard debating tactic to use one generally acceptable act to justify another technically similar act. I see nothing wrong with what he did myself. I don't agree with trophy huntin
  23. Wowee, I boxed in amateurs as a teenager, ran for Yorkshire and was in the academy for Barnsley FC. That doesn't automatically mean I'm an expert on all these subjects does it? If that's the case then only the best fighters would be the best boxing trainers but that ain't the case. Adam Booth is a recent example of this, i can name many more.
×
×
  • Create New...