blan89
-
Content Count
1,151 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Articles
Gun Dealer's and Fieldsports Shop's
Reloading Room
Blogs
Calendar
Store
Classifieds
Everything posted by blan89
-
http://ilemi.me/index.php follow the link at the bottom of here
-
when have you ever heard me speak? your a test tube baby btw just thought you should know
-
You don't need effective weapons to kill a human being pal, people were using sharpened bits of metal for thousands of years, and bits of broken flint & wood before that. Humans will always behave like humans IMO, no matter what technology they've got in their hands. my point was that if a small group of people try to oppress a much larger militant group they'll need better weaponry and tactics to even have a chance of winning,without a military industry investing hundreds of millions in being at the forefront of weapon technology that imo wouldnt happen,there would be improvements
-
Who would define what the laws should be, if not some system of government? Maybe your system could work in a very small group, but lets not forget there are about 65 million people living in the UK. I can't very well see how you'd get them all sat down at a table to thrash out and agree on a set of laws! That's why we elect politicians in the first place. Shame the fuckers seem to forget that once they're got their feet over the threshold in the houses of parliament.. what about laws that already exist like common law are mutually agreed upon by the majority in small communities and
-
that'd do me mate
-
Who would define what the laws should be, if not some system of government? Maybe your system could work in a very small group, but lets not forget there are about 65 million people living in the UK. I can't very well see how you'd get them all sat down at a table to thrash out and agree on a set of laws! That's why we elect politicians in the first place. Shame the fuckers seem to forget that once they're got their feet over the threshold in the houses of parliament.. what about laws that already exist like common law are mutually agreed upon by the majority in small communities and
-
Its also an incentive to stitch people up F*ck this,if the UK collapses into a lawless free-for-all like Somalia you can all go and claim asylum in the states or Australia or NZ true,but if found not guilty and then the person who made the arrest/accusation is open to be charged. ther are already such thing as bounty hunter who could in theory incite crimes in the same way. not to mention police who need to fill quotas.
-
I admire your faith in human nature & how you think we could self police in the absence of government, but IMO it wouldn't be long before the stronger willed among us started grouping together & dictating what was best for the rest of society. That's how rule started in the first place. There will always be leaders and followers, it's human nature. All men are equal, but some are more equal than others! if we were all armed then when people started trying to take freedom away from us (or any group) we could just kill them couldnt we? Yip and we could start with little in
-
imo it would take an event like the government collapsing to wake people up,then everyone has the right to rule themselves as long as they stick to common law or a similar set of clearly defined laws,if they dont then they may be arrested by anyone tried (by an elected person) and executed if found guilty. their possessions go to the one who arrested them,which is the incentive to catch criminals.
-
I admire your faith in human nature & how you think we could self police in the absence of government, but IMO it wouldn't be long before the stronger willed among us started grouping together & dictating what was best for the rest of society. That's how rule started in the first place. There will always be leaders and followers, it's human nature. All men are equal, but some are more equal than others! if we were all armed then when people started trying to take freedom away from us (or any group) we could just kill them couldnt we?
-
in an armed society i think your right,however what if those scum bags are the only people with guns?
-
care to explain? and why can agents of the government ie the police can still fine and even arrest me for not wearing my seatbelt?
-
that was not a dig,i knew you'd take offence to it though. so what would any rural far off the beaten track village offer to looters/house invaders? baring in mind money would be of no value. ive got family in Schckootland who i visit a few times a year,they're not as easily offended as you,but then again they do cut about in tartan skirts and eat a shit load of shortbread.
-
I think it will happen sooner or later,we've pretty much lost all sense of community and any way to defend ourselves so imo it would be chaos,criminals who have guns would have free reign completely un-opposed to rob/rape/murder whoever they want. and as technology develops there will be less chance of survival with easier accessibility to thermal imaging technology (you'll be the only big white blob in the woods if thats were you hide) I think sparsely populated places would be slightly better off,in rural in Scotland for example it wouldnt be worth traveling there using ammo etc just
-
apparently ed miliband thinks the strikes are wrong http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=PZtVm8wtyFI
-
wlad in 7
-
there was some classics there
-
its more dirty than wet with sweetcorn and peanut residue all down the shaft :sick: i told you to empty and wash before it enters! arse bandits are back again i see,wrecking yet another thread with juvenile comments. I know what a bunch of c*nts, defiling this literary masterpiece of a thread.
-
Same here, I was booted out of school by the age of 13 and no other school would have me, so I was sent on a course for Naughty kids Which was a load of b*llocks. i got put on one of those when i was about 15,the worrying thing is the amount of qualifications they give you,fitness instructing,first aid,food hygiene etc,and yet most of the retards in that class couldnt be trusted to hold a pen without 2 'learning assistants' watching over them ready to restrain them if they had a funny moment.
-
maybe its because i live in the burbs now,but the worst owners on average here are fat labs,not the dogs fault theyre just full of energy from not being walked all winter,untrained,un-socialised,but worst of all completely out of control. then the owners complain when they're dog jumps on mine and gets half its face ripped off.
-
im torn between wanting to let off a shotgun in their faces (because theyre still police) and wanting to blow somethin else all over their faces. would doing both be wrong?
-
you've got to love the old 30's-50's infomercials. i remember seeing one explaining how negroes have smaller brains than Caucasian,imagine trying to get away with saying that now.
-
-
police cars? if not you should of told them to f**k off.
-
I cant find where i read the study now but it wasnt that the soldiers were putting themselves in less danger,they were firing there rifles with no conscious intention of killing the enemy,they still put themselves in the dangerous situations. maybe the situation regarding families,pensions etc added to the distress.
