shaaark
-
Content Count
14,944 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
6
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Articles
Gun Dealer's and Fieldsports Shop's
Reloading Room
Blogs
Calendar
Store
Classifieds
Everything posted by shaaark
-
?
-
Another one of mine lol ? And the track!! Lol Darbo, have you read his autobiography, 'fighting was my business'? Fascinating ?
-
Greb, you know these threads gravitate in random directions, of their own free will ??
-
Greb, have you read about john edward kelly? If not, have a read ?
-
My all time favourite fighter/boxer ?
-
-
I personally think most people on here are on the fence really charts. Like me, yesterday I was 65%, today I'm 35%. % of having the vaccine or not, I couldn't tell you!! ?
-
16 hands, but as a youngster was described as 'a bit weedy, parrot-mouthed, with imperfect forelegs', lol. I still say greville starkey left it too late, before going after shahrastani, in the 1986 derby.
-
Yep, there's ony 7 horses rated higher than his 140, all of them, all time greats, the likes of sea bird, brigadier gerard. ?
-
Me neither. Yesterday I was 65%, but today I'm 35% ?
-
Good horse he was, in the 80's. Came second to dancing brave in the 'arc' 1986. Just thought I'd lighten the mood a tad ??
-
And me, I'm 65% ?
-
Leviticus ?
-
And ali, clay at the time, was 14 stone 11lb, I think. Certainly a couple of pounds under 15 stone ?
-
Seen one once, with a shiny collar on ?
-
Wilf will be along shortly, to sort this fiasco out ?
-
You don't get a feathered 1st cross ?
-
I think that's the point max is trying to make. ?
-
I just meant in general mate. Most heavys of that time were around the 13 stone mark. ?
-
Most heavyweights of that era were only about 13 stone. Some, that fought middleweight, light heavy and heavy, would average about 170lb and just go up and down the weights, depending on who they were fighting. Things were far less strict then, than what they are now.
-
Didn't have you down as a racist ? But I sort of agree, brindle would be better ?
-
I think we're all fed up, confused and so pissed off with this whole covid crap, it's hard just to keep reading it all, and try to make sense of it! Lol. Anyway, no malice intended mate ?
-
Look at your posts above mate, and they do look a bit hypocritical. And there's been more bullshit and lies from the government and scientists re stats, figures etc, that have been pasted and copied on here, by the pro vaxxers, than by people that don't want a covid vaccine. And your later posts, have made more sense the your first couple. I think we're pretty similar in our opinion on this really, as are many others. I won't be having it, you won't, socks won't, and many others on here won't, but can understand why some people will have it, for their own personal reasons, and
-
Lol, but he's correct ?
-
Can't really add anything else to this post. Clear, concise, and refreshingly sensible.
