Jump to content

Born Hunter

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    17,865

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    31

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Born Hunter

  1. Born Hunter
    I don't believe that, many people have terrible upbringings and don't do half the things these monsters do. At the age of 3 Bundy showed signs of abnormal behaviour. His aunty remembered waking up from taking a nap and seeing that little Ted had taken all of the knives out of the kitchen and placed them all around her body, when she confronted him he just smirked.... I'd say that every individual has their own genetic (born) susceptibility to becoming a psycho/socio-path. Some are probably very likely with anything less than a perfect environment to instill a strong moral mindset.
  2. Born Hunter
    I think there's a transgender in the opening ceremony. Fill ya boots! There's Gisele too mind.
  3. Born Hunter
    Personally, I think there is a monster in all of us, and it's largely circumstance (environment and social conditioning) that keeps it locked away. Is it not true that often these psychopaths and sociopaths are just hyper rational people who's logic has taken them to a monstrous place? Is it not true that some men who have experienced it have developed a very natural enjoyment for the hunting/killing of other men? Is it just opportunity and a lack of this hyper rational thought that stops regular folk taking similar paths in life?
  4. Born Hunter
    Oh yeah, if you're one that doesn't like the games then you can keep ya thoughts to ya self! Miserable b*****ds!
  5. Born Hunter
    Well, who's looking forward to this spectacle over the coming weeks? I believe the opening ceremony is midnight tonight. It's probably the only sporting event that I actually have a bit of passion for. I'm not a mad keen follower of the athletes or sports but I do love the Olympics. The diverse mix of disciplines, sporting excellence, the grandeur of it all. Other than the bread and butter track and field events I really enjoy the gymnastics, weightlifting and swimming. I can even get into the sailing and rowing. There must be a few amateur boxing fans on here too? What's everyone'
  6. Born Hunter
    You don't need rights, you have white privileged! That's basically why so many blacks and browns drowned in the Med this year.......... it's white folk not rescuing them fast enough and not taking them to swimming lessons! Seriously couldn't make it up. That last point was f***ing hilarious! "And finally, we BLM are cunting everybody off across the UK going about their lives because so many of us non white folk have drowned this year! It's a terrible thing that society must do something about!" f***ing LOL. Talk about misplaced responsibility!
  7. Born Hunter
    So there's been a bit of a BLM protest across major UK cities this morning. Shutting down whatever public transport they can to make their point. So what is their point I wonder? Black people are overrepresented by more than a factor of two for deaths in police custody since 1998. Black people are up to 37 times more likely to be stopped and searched than white people. Black people are three times more likely to be arrested than white people. Black people are 44% more likely to be detained under the mental health act than white people. Black people are three times more likely to be une
  8. Born Hunter
    So to sum up; It could have made a f***ing big bang?? Probably, but a firecracker compared to that from a thermonuclear warhead! It's not the explosive energy that was concerning anyway, it's the radioactive matter that the explosion would throw into the atmosphere that was the concern. If we are he'll bent on calling it a bomb then it would have been a dirty bomb, not any kind of nuclear weapon.
  9. Born Hunter
    Max, I'm not qualified to make that judgement. It sounds reasonable on the face of it. I suspect in reality though it wouldn't cut it. Surely some greeny has done the analysis? Be interwsting to see no doubt. Right now I'm more concerned with what to have for tea than saving the world, LOL.
  10. Born Hunter
    This is off Wikipedia, discredit the source if you like. "The smoldering graphite, fuel and other material above, at more than 1200 °C, started to burn through the reactor floor and mixed with molten concrete from the reactor lining, creating corium, a radioactive semi-liquid material comparable to lava. If this mixture had melted through the floor into the pool of water, it was feared it could have created a serious steam explosion that would have ejected more radioactive material from the reactor. It became necessary to drain the pool."
  11. Born Hunter
    If it'd have hit water you'd have had a steam explosion, which is bad but not a thermonuclear explosion! Any suggestion of that is really based on very ermmm 'fantastic' theory. A nuclear weapon is very highly engineered. Yes it uses the same physics but controlling it to make it a violent explosion require very precise engineering! Comparing a nuclear meltdown to a bomb is like comparing firewood to Semtex.
  12. Born Hunter
    You're entitled to believe what you like matey. I'm saying what you have been told is complete garbage. It's a terribly liberal use of scientific theory at best and a complete lie at worst. The amount of water does not mater! You cannot make a thermonuclear bomb by dropping a critical mass into a body of water! I'll have a quick look at the doc if I get chance. Cheers.
  13. Born Hunter
    It has it's risks and when it goes wrong it is definitely worse than similar with other power stations but the risks and consequences are largely overstated by the media and public opinion. Most folks know f**k all about atomic energy and nuclear interactions other than what they have seen on sci-fi films. The fact that many think a nuclear reactor is simply a controlled bomb highlights this. How many folks realise they have a alpha emitting nuclear source in their fire alarms? How many people does the average Joe think died as a direct cause of Chernobyl? Could the average person even exp
  14. Born Hunter
    The UK’s current R&D landscape; The UK has established a reputation for performing world-leading research in science and technology, both in industry and academia. We played a pioneering role in bringing civil nuclear energy to market 60 years ago, and are now conducting world-leading R&D to decommission and clean up our historic facilities, overseen by the NDA. We are also at the cutting edge of R&D into nuclear fusion technology, and fully engaged with international collaborations through the UK national fusion laboratory at the Culham Centre for Fusion Energy (CCFE). To
  15. Born Hunter
    What expertise? BH who seems to know his stuff in this area has said Britain doesn't have the expertise necessary to build a nuclear power plant without foreign input. I may have been a bit dramatic in saying that we couldn't do it, lol. I'll admit that before this turns into an argument based on half truths. We probably could, we still have a nuclear industry obviously just one that we seem to have stepped back from. The investment in UK nuclear power isn't what it was. It's difficult to just let an industry wither and then throw a huge project at it and expect it to be able to handle
  16. Born Hunter
    Never mind Raccoons and Lynx, there's a f***ing African Lion allegedly running about Cornwall now!!!! http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/08/02/lion-on-the-loose-in-cornwall-sparks-police-hunt1/
  17. Born Hunter
    We literally couldn't if we wanted to. With the anti nuclear movement decades ago the arse fell out of British nuclear technology. We just don't have the expertise anymore. We'd be starting again from scratch and that would take more time and money. The Chinks have a bad name from their mass production of the worlds shite but they are capable of producing quality too, especially when under the QC of a Western country. Tbh I don't know much of the details of how this is to be done though. I know people directly affected by it. Universities stopped teaching courses, we stopped research and
  18. Born Hunter
    We literally couldn't if we wanted to. With the anti nuclear movement decades ago the arse fell out of British nuclear technology. We just don't have the expertise anymore. We'd be starting again from scratch and that would take more time and money. The Chinks have a bad name from their mass production of the worlds shite but they are capable of producing quality too, especially when under the QC of a Western country. Tbh I don't know much of the details of how this is to be done though.
  19. Born Hunter
    if the reactor in chernobyl had fell through that concrete floor and hit the water below. Well thats exactly what it would have been. A thermo nuclear explosion they reckoned about 50times more powerfull than hiroshima. .im not anti nuclear power,but i do think that no expense or safety checks be spared when building one. With respect mate, that claim is fear mongering bullshit. As is so common with nuclear energy. https://www.physicsforums.com A nuclear weapons is a hell of a precise and controlled piece of engineering. You can't just add a critical mass to a bucket of water and level a ci
  20. Born Hunter
    LOL. I know that a reactor going pop ain't good fella but that doesn't make it a nuclear bomb or justify use of the term. The inverse square law is for radiation as you know, in the event of a reactor melting down its the radioactive isotopes being expelled into the atmosphere that causes issues. Simple gamma radiation is fairly straightforward to deal with.
  21. Born Hunter
    Just an FYI, a nuclear power station is not a nuclear bomb and to the best of my knowledge cannot be turned into one.
  22. Born Hunter
    Why would it? Do I need to answer that question? I do not know the protocol for air travel near the area. But like you said surely they are not allowed to breach these restrictions, how it entered this airspace without getting shot down is hard for me to accept. Yes, why would it specifically have a particularly advanced air defence system when the System that defends the entire US was probably considered suitable? I'm not sure where the nearest USAF QRA base is for the DC area but commercial aircraft operate around DC. If such an imminent threat pops up how effective will the F-16s rea
  23. Born Hunter
    When I was last on a flight coming into Heathrow, the pilot gave us a bit of a tour of London, lol. Doing a big circle low enough to point out the houses of parliament if i recall. No typhoon would have been able to stop him obliterating any of the most important government buildings in London! The systems in place were supposed to stop that ever occurring. I think 911 showed how mistaken they were.
  24. Born Hunter
    Why would it? Do I need to answer that question? I do not know the protocol for air travel near the area. But like you said surely they are not allowed to breach these restrictions, how it entered this airspace without getting shot down is hard for me to accept. Yes, why would it specifically have a particularly advanced air defence system when the System that defends the entire US was probably considered suitable? I'm not sure where the nearest USAF QRA base is for the DC area but commercial aircraft operate around DC. If such an imminent threat pops up how effective will the F-16
  25. Born Hunter
    Why would the Pentagon have had a particularly advance air defence system? Pre 911 I don't think the yanks ever considered such an aerial attack on the mainland at all plausible. I'd of thought the risk associated with having a system like what our warships have too great in such a commercially busy domestic area. The risk of accidentally shooting down a commercial airline would probably be too great to justify it. Dealing with aerial threats in peace time is the USAFs job with their fighters. The purpose of the Air Defense Identification Zone is in theory to stop any aerial threats ever penet
×
×
  • Create New...