hard dig to my lakie bitch

[Guest ROOSTER]

but why mislead people.

[rob.i 26]

Jamie ffs next time you dig roll around in the shit then everyone is happy

[dev 227]

well done jamie mate, hard looking ground dude!!

[sue 1]

they call women bitchy lol

[matt d 1]

but why mislead people.

what do you mean mislead people?

[J Darcy 5,871]

Good luck to the lad, but all i was saying is that the dig doesnt look fresh.

Theres old pine needles all over the lower side where you would have been stood on had a dig been there.

The spoil doesnt look fresh.

No sign of where the "excavated" stone/rubble is/was. and everyones nice and clean.

 

And, yes i have worked lots of places like that and there isnt just stone, lots of soil and debris inbetween, and if you are digging "with hands" im sure you would be blathered.

Just looks like plenty of time has elapsed between the dig and the photo.

 

If you zoom in the old needles and debris litter the floor of the dig. All these would be displaced by footfal and/or the rocks/stones pulled out.

And where are the rocks and stones that has been dug? Theres a large void there so my guess is they are down the banking. If so then these too are covered with a layer of needles as can be seen on two of the pics.

 

Just seems odd thats all.....

 

But, like i say, good luck.......

[Guest ROOSTER]

oops , i may have got it wrong, its just when jd quires him within a minute he replys saying he dug it a year ago yet the heading made me think it was then, now ive read it again i see the lad as dug it twice once on one side and now a bit deeper on the other side. i do apolgise for my misreading.

[dogga 1]

is this a recent dig then or not?fair enough if you have dug it in the past but at least say so rather than saying you dug it recently.

[alimac 882]

the last pic is after we finished where goin to tidy up pal just thought id put a pic up to show what we hwere diggin in thats all theres no point posting on this site when its full of critics

[stej 0]

if u look at the second image down you will see the shuvel

right nxt to the dig why put a shuvel nxt to a dig that has been dug about 2

year ago in my estamations and its sank,you dnt need to be a

rocket scientist to work that 1 out,listen to [bANNED TEXT] j darcy said and [bANNED TEXT] was said

is bang on i think this lad is tryin to pull the wool over our eyes dnt you?

if you are gona be a proper terrier man be 1,its like me picking a fox dead of the road

and saying look [bANNED TEXT] i got with my 8month old bedlington whippet

it just wouldnt happen WOULD IT!

 

IM STARTING TO WONDER IF THERE ARE DECENT LADS ON HERE

HA HA HA! not having a go just have a think [bANNED TEXT] iv said!

[brock 11]

darcy you should be a detective.well caught out tho. But i still think theres too many people on here with way to much time on their hands,

[the_stig 6,614]

plenty of photos of bloated road kills around

[Guest john the baptist]

Good luck to the lad, but all i was saying is that the dig doesnt look fresh.

Theres old pine needles all over the lower side where you would have been stood on had a dig been there.

The spoil doesnt look fresh.

No sign of where the "excavated" stone/rubble is/was. and everyones nice and clean.

 

And, yes i have worked lots of places like that and there isnt just stone, lots of soil and debris inbetween, and if you are digging "with hands" im sure you would be blathered.

Just looks like plenty of time has elapsed between the dig and the photo.

 

If you zoom in the old needles and debris litter the floor of the dig. All these would be displaced by footfal and/or the rocks/stones pulled out.

And where are the rocks and stones that has been dug? Theres a large void there so my guess is they are down the banking. If so then these too are covered with a layer of needles as can be seen on two of the pics.

 

Just seems odd thats all.....

 

But, like i say, good luck.......

 

He's right tha knows. I reckon both man and dog would be a bit more mucky than that.