Binoculars.

[Seagull 647]

2 minutes ago, mC HULL said:

With me eye lol

 

[mC HULL 15,819]

2 minutes ago, Seagull said:

 

Red In there lol

Edited 3 hours ago by mC HULL

[Seagull 647]

11 minutes ago, mC HULL said:

Red In there lol

That's a terrible cataract that pal. Lol

[mC HULL 15,819]

Just now, Seagull said:

That's a terrible cataract that pal. Lol

Don't tell me that ffs lol 

[shaaark 11,400]

38 minutes ago, mC HULL said:

With me eye lol

Easy for you, Gooey, you can tell a firecrest from a goldcrest at 500 yards!! Lol

[mC HULL 15,819]

2 minutes ago, shaaark said:

Easy for you, Gooey, you can tell a firecrest from a goldcrest at 500 yards!! Lol

I don't know a firecrest from a goldcrest lol

[shaaark 11,400]

45 minutes ago, mC HULL said:

I don't know a firecrest from a goldcrest lol

I just remembered, it was a starling from a blackbird!!

Still f****n unbelievable with the naked eye at 500 yards!!

Edited 2 hours ago by shaaark

[low plains drifter 11,191]

[Seagull 647]

14 minutes ago, low plains drifter said:

There she blows? 

[Greyman 31,517]

4 hours ago, mC HULL said:

Mine were hundred quid out of fishing shop tracker I think been good 

I use mine more for watch farms roads dog walkers etc thermal for game 

I thought you could spot a wren at 500 yrds with your bare eyes at night mate ???

[low plains drifter 11,191]

2 minutes ago, Seagull said:

There she blows? 

You're on it Mandingo 

[Seagull 647]

2 minutes ago, low plains drifter said:

You're on it Mandingo 

Can't go wrong with Leica can you, but I think I'm going to go with the Diamondbacks, from all the reviews I've read they keep up with some of the premium brands and even beat them, better for the buck, but like anything, the more you spend usually the better you get, £250 is reasonable to me.

[low plains drifter 11,191]

6 minutes ago, Seagull said:

Can't go wrong with Leica can you, but I think I'm going to go with the Diamondbacks, from all the reviews I've read they keep up with some of the premium brands and even beat them, better for the buck, but like anything, the more you spend usually the better you get, £250 is reasonable to me.

I wanted to try the Vortex aswell, but they didn't have any in, so I tried Hawke, think one of the eye cups popped off which was the same issue I had with a pair of Hawke years ago

They had some tidy kit in the London camera exchange Swarovski, and some Nikon that I've heard a wildlife photographer recommending, but they're pricey

[Seagull 647]

35 minutes ago, low plains drifter said:

I wanted to try the Vortex aswell, but they didn't have any in, so I tried Hawke, think one of the eye cups popped off which was the same issue I had with a pair of Hawke years ago

They had some tidy kit in the London camera exchange Swarovski, and some Nikon that I've heard a wildlife photographer recommending, but they're pricey

Aye, with a good set I could have confirmed if they were eagles or not, it would have been epic if they were.