mushroom 14,080 Posted June 7 Report Share Posted June 7 9 minutes ago, chartpolski said: 1-0 ,total shite….. Cheers. A lovely kid walked up to me and said I have it here… in Brazilian Portuguese The wee man lent me his phone for the rest of the game. Just threw him a slushie, a plate of chicken wings and a tenner lol His dad was laughing and saying how do you normally watch it… I replied I’m not allowed as I get too excited Quote Link to post Share on other sites
chartpolski 27,896 Posted June 7 Report Share Posted June 7 1 minute ago, mushroom said: A lovely kid walked up to me and said I have it here… in Brazilian Portuguese The wee man lent me his phone for the rest of the game. Just threw him a slushie, a plate of chicken wings and a tenner lol His dad was laughing and saying how do you normally watch it… I replied I’m not allowed as I get too excited My new dentist is called Gumairas. I asked him if he’s Brazilian or Portuguese, he laughed and said no, I’m no relation to Bruno ! Everyone he meets in Newcastle must ask him ! LOL ! Cheers. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mushroom 14,080 Posted June 7 Report Share Posted June 7 If England win the World Cup does that mean we/humans landed on the moon? Or am I just wishful thinking? Lol Quote Link to post Share on other sites
chartpolski 27,896 Posted June 7 Report Share Posted June 7 1 minute ago, mushroom said: If England win the World Cup does that mean we/humans landed on the moon? Or am I just wishful thinking? Lol More chance of convincing my protege that gravity exists than England winning the World Cup on that performance! LOL ! Cheers. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Pardus 1,610 Posted June 7 Report Share Posted June 7 (edited) 3 hours ago, Francie, said: The first example of transitional animal is the mesonycid,it was not an aquatic animal at all. Next is the pakicetus of which they've only found a bit of skull an a supposed ankle bone,nothing else,but speculate it was a transitional animal to Whales lol But they've only found a bit of skull an a ankle bone,probably not even of the same animal. I'm afraid the author of this piece is just putting animals together from supposed 50 million years ago an more,iv readthe whole thing an it's not very convincing mate,just speculation an assumptions,not scientific at all I'm afraid you wouldn't believe it because you're too far down the bible rabbit hole, a book that makes claims with little to zero evidence. What exactly do you want them to find, bones with tags on stating "transition fossil of whale"? Edited June 7 by Pardus Quote Link to post Share on other sites
chartpolski 27,896 Posted June 7 Report Share Posted June 7 Mush,I never realised you were a maths graduate, but you know when you’re doing calculations in your head and prime numbers are red, and Fibonacci numbers are blue and numbers that are both prime and Fibonacci are purple, and your trying to plot a graph , do you ever get confused ? Then you’ve got Algebra, and they throw in Boolean Algebra ! How confusing is that ????? Just having a laugh mate ! Cheers. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Francie, 2,816 Posted June 7 Report Share Posted June 7 1 hour ago, Pardus said: I'm afraid you wouldn't believe it because you're too far down the bible rabbit hole, a book that makes claims with little to zero evidence. What exactly do you want them to find, bones with tags on stating "transition fossil of whale"? Mate I used to beleive it before I went down the rabbit hole on it years ago,there is no evidence because its point blank lies lol Think about it for one second,how even did nothing explode to create everything,you or no scientist can get past that hurdle,nor then how non living material all of a sudden became a living organism,now when I say jesus died an rose again on third day you laugh,but evoloution starting point is just bizarre an no way scientific Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Pardus 1,610 Posted June 7 Report Share Posted June 7 1 minute ago, Francie, said: Mate I used to beleive it before I went down the rabbit hole on it years ago,there is no evidence because its point blank lies lol Think about it for one second,how even did nothing explode to create everything,you or no scientist can get past that hurdle,nor then how non living material all of a sudden became a living organism,now when I say jesus died an rose again on third day you laugh,but evoloution starting point is just bizarre an no way scientific That's very big of you to admit the bible is point blank lies lol. Who's to say the Big Bang was the absolute beginning? It could be the beginning of the observable universe, we just don't know. We are talking about the evolution on earth here aren't we, the transition fossils are very real and extremely telling. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
chartpolski 27,896 Posted June 7 Report Share Posted June 7 2 minutes ago, Francie, said: Mate I used to beleive it before I went down the rabbit hole on it years ago,there is no evidence because its point blank lies lol Think about it for one second,how even did nothing explode to create everything,you or no scientist can get past that hurdle,nor then how non living material all of a sudden became a living organism,now when I say jesus died an rose again on third day you laugh,but evoloution starting point is just bizarre an no way scientific Francie , why couldn’t your omnipotent god just have pointed his finger and said let it be done and non living material become living ? After all he supposedly did it with clay , in the bible, so why not at the beginning ? I don’t know the answers, but the breathing life into clay seems less likely than a god who planned it from the very beginning and saw evolution as the way forward. Cheers. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Francie, 2,816 Posted June 7 Report Share Posted June 7 8 minutes ago, Pardus said: That's very big of you to admit the bible is point blank lies lol. Who's to say the Big Bang was the absolute beginning? It could be the beginning of the observable universe, we just don't know. We are talking about the evolution on earth here aren't we, the transition fossils are very real and extremely telling. So you don't agree with the mainstream science that the big bang was the beginning? Were are talking of the theory of evoloution yes but the big bang is the first steps of evoloution theory Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Francie, 2,816 Posted June 7 Report Share Posted June 7 5 minutes ago, chartpolski said: Francie , why couldn’t your omnipotent god just have pointed his finger and said let it be done and non living material become living ? After all he supposedly did it with clay , in the bible, so why not at the beginning ? I don’t know the answers, but the breathing life into clay seems less likely than a god who planned it from the very beginning and saw evolution as the way forward. Cheers. He did do that with creation,he spoke it into existence according to scripture,an as I said before that's my faith an belief an I'm not trying to impose it on you mate. Scripture says we are created in God's image,evoloution is a f****d up long road haha 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Pardus 1,610 Posted June 7 Report Share Posted June 7 8 minutes ago, Francie, said: So you don't agree with the mainstream science that the big bang was the beginning? Were are talking of the theory of evoloution yes but the big bang is the first steps of evoloution theory Who knows? But nothing doesn't always mean nothing in the sense you think it does. In quantum physics even a vacuum isn't absolutely void of anything. Have you seen the experiment where two parallel metal plates placed close together in a vacuum experience an attractive force? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
chartpolski 27,896 Posted June 7 Report Share Posted June 7 4 minutes ago, Francie, said: He did do that with creation,he spoke it into existence according to scripture,an as I said before that's my faith an belief an I'm not trying to impose it on you mate. Scripture says we are created in God's image,evoloution is a f****d up long road haha Francie mate, it gives me absolutely no pleasure to see your complete faith system crumbling in real time here on THL ! We go back a fair while with our discussions, but you were 100% against evolution, but now you agree with me that all primates have a common evolutionary ancestry. You were 100% against the Big Bang , but now you are agreeing with Greb that it happened ! A “road to Damascus “ moment ? We will still love to mate, no matter what ! LOL ! Cheers. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Pardus 1,610 Posted June 7 Report Share Posted June 7 From nothing might not necessarily mean absolutely nothing in the universe. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.