Deworm yourself

[Goly 1,823]

1 minute ago, Francie, said:

Come on goly,your slacking

The dye used in PET scans for cancer contains sugar, typically in the form of a molecule called fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG), because cancer cells tend to use much more glucose (sugar) than normal cells, so when injected with a radioactive form of sugar, the cancer cells will absorb more of it, making them easily identifiable on the scan; essentially, the sugar acts as a marker to highlight where the cancerous tissue is located in the body. 

Must try harder mate.

Cancer cells usually grow quickly, multiplying at a fast rate, and that requires a lot of energy. That means they need lots of glucose.

Here’s where the myth that sugar fuels cancer was born: if cancer cells need lots of glucose, then cutting sugar out of our diet must help stop cancer growing, and could even stop it developing in the first place, right? 

Unfortunately, it’s not that simple. All of our healthy cells need glucose too, and there’s no way of telling our bodies to let healthy cells have the glucose they need without also giving it to cancer cells. And cancer cells also need lots of other nutrients too, like amino acids and fats; it’s not just sugar they crave.

 

Sugar and cancer – what you need to know

NEWS.CANCERRESEARCHUK.ORG

---

We take a look at claims that sugar 'feeds' cancer cells and explore the links between the amount of sugar in our...

[Francie, 2,485]

1 minute ago, Goly said:

Must try harder mate.

Cancer cells usually grow quickly, multiplying at a fast rate, and that requires a lot of energy. That means they need lots of glucose.

Here’s where the myth that sugar fuels cancer was born: if cancer cells need lots of glucose, then cutting sugar out of our diet must help stop cancer growing, and could even stop it developing in the first place, right? 

Unfortunately, it’s not that simple. All of our healthy cells need glucose too, and there’s no way of telling our bodies to let healthy cells have the glucose they need without also giving it to cancer cells. And cancer cells also need lots of other nutrients too, like amino acids and fats; it’s not just sugar they crave.

 

Sugar and cancer – what you need to know

NEWS.CANCERRESEARCHUK.ORG

---

We take a look at claims that sugar 'feeds' cancer cells and explore the links between the amount of sugar in our...

 

Well why don't they inject fats or amino acids in with the dye then?

The body produces glucose itself,it doesn't need extra glucose coming in.

You know for a fact that it's not wise to eat sugar if you get diagnosed with cancer,you just don't want to admit your wrong mate

[Goly 1,823]

Wrong again.

There’s no evidence that following a “sugar-free” diet lowers the risk of getting cancer, or that it boosts the chances of surviving if you are diagnosed.

And following severely restricted diets with very low amounts of carbohydrate could damage health in the long term by eliminating foods that are good sources of fibre and vitamins. 

This is particularly important for cancer patients, because some treatments can result in weight loss and put the body under a lot of stress. So poor nutrition from restrictive diets could also hamper recovery, or even be life-threatening. 

[Francie, 2,485]

2 minutes ago, Goly said:

Wrong again.

There’s no evidence that following a “sugar-free” diet lowers the risk of getting cancer, or that it boosts the chances of surviving if you are diagnosed.

And following severely restricted diets with very low amounts of carbohydrate could damage health in the long term by eliminating foods that are good sources of fibre and vitamins. 

This is particularly important for cancer patients, because some treatments can result in weight loss and put the body under a lot of stress. So poor nutrition from restrictive diets could also hamper recovery, or even be life-threatening. 

No one said very low carbs,there's carbs that are very low on the glycemix index,that you could eat.

Goly your more stubborn than me lol

 

[Goly 1,823]

Just now, Francie, said:

No one said very low carbs,there's carbs that are very low on the glycemix index,that you could eat.

Goly your more stubborn than me lol

 

It specifically states that a sugar free diet doesn't lower  the risk of getting cancer or boosts your prognosis when diagnosed.

 

[Francie, 2,485]

10 minutes ago, Goly said:

It specifically states that a sugar free diet doesn't lower  the risk of getting cancer or boosts your prognosis when diagnosed.

 

Well you can choose to beleive that I think that's bollocks.

Has it been tested an verified?

[Goly 1,823]

2 minutes ago, Francie, said:

Well you can choose to beleive that I think that's bollocks.

Has it been tested an verified?

It's on the Cancer Research website not the Shooting Times.

Don't tell me, they're in on it, big pharma and all that, well apart from the ones who make the treatments that you've shared, no, they are the only one's that you can trust? Lol

[Francie, 2,485]

This is comedy gold,there's that many contradictions I don't know were to start

 

Overview

+4

 

Yes, research shows that eating sugar does not make cancer grow faster. However, a diet high in sugar can lead to weight gain, which may increase the risk of developing some cancers. 

 

Explanation

• All cells, including cancer cells, use glucose (sugar) for energy. 
   
• The body stores sugar to use as energy later. 
   
• Cancer cells consume more sugar than normal cells. 
   
• However, eating more sugar does not make cancer cells grow faster. 
   
• Depriving cancer cells of sugar does not make them grow more slowly. 
   

Tips to reduce sugar intake 

 

• Limit sugary drinks like soda, sports drinks, and fruit juice
• Limit sweets like candy, cookies, ice cream, and pastries
• Choose whole fruit instead of fruit juice
• Choose whole grains like whole wheat bread and pasta instead of refined grains

Other cancer risk factors

Obesity is associated with an increased risk of developing several types of cancer. Eating too much sugar can also lead to weight gain and increase the risk of diabetes. 

[Francie, 2,485]

It's says getting fat increases your risk of getting cancer,an how does one get fat,eating carbs which is sugar.

Because you can not get fat eating proteins an good fat no matter how much you eat.

I give up on you goly lol

[Goly 1,823]

Just now, Francie, said:

This is comedy gold,there's that many contradictions I don't know were to start

 

Overview

+4

 

Yes, research shows that eating sugar does not make cancer grow faster. However, a diet high in sugar can lead to weight gain, which may increase the risk of developing some cancers. 

 

Explanation

• All cells, including cancer cells, use glucose (sugar) for energy. 
   
• The body stores sugar to use as energy later. 
   
• Cancer cells consume more sugar than normal cells. 
   
• However, eating more sugar does not make cancer cells grow faster. 
   
• Depriving cancer cells of sugar does not make them grow more slowly. 
   

Tips to reduce sugar intake 

 

• Limit sugary drinks like soda, sports drinks, and fruit juice
• Limit sweets like candy, cookies, ice cream, and pastries
• Choose whole fruit instead of fruit juice
• Choose whole grains like whole wheat bread and pasta instead of refined grains

Other cancer risk factors

Obesity is associated with an increased risk of developing several types of cancer. Eating too much sugar can also lead to weight gain and increase the risk of diabetes. 

You're failing to see the woods for the trees. What it is clearly saying is that eating excessive sugar can lead to weight gain and obesity which increases the risk of cancer. I must have pointed this out to you a million times, does it sink in at all? Lol

[mC HULL 14,291]

51 minutes ago, Francie, said:

Come on goly,your slacking

The dye used in PET scans for cancer contains sugar, typically in the form of a molecule called fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG), because cancer cells tend to use much more glucose (sugar) than normal cells, so when injected with a radioactive form of sugar, the cancer cells will absorb more of it, making them easily identifiable on the scan; essentially, the sugar acts as a marker to highlight where the cancerous tissue is located in the body. 

when i’ve had pet scans mate they say the dye shows up and cancer say has blood to it so a mass will show up when the dye hits it same with any blockages nothing to do with sugar i dont think

[Francie, 2,485]

Say I eat over the recommended daily calories,say 4000.

So 4000 in any carbs,breads pasta etc 

Vs 4000 calories in protein an saturated fat,who going to get fat?

Answers on a postcard

[Francie, 2,485]

2 minutes ago, mC HULL said:

when i’ve had pet scans mate they say the dye shows up and cancer say has blood to it so a mass will show up when the dye hits it same with any blockages nothing to do with sugar i dont think

Look it up mc,the sugar goes straight to the cancer cells,not blockages in arteries,different tests your on about lol

[Goly 1,823]

25 minutes ago, Francie, said:

Say I eat over the recommended daily calories,say 4000.

So 4000 in any carbs,breads pasta etc 

Vs 4000 calories in protein an saturated fat,who going to get fat?

Answers on a postcard

Both, you can fit the answer on a stamp.

Basic stuff this Francie come on lad get your head back in the game, them unfilmed 18 pull-ups have left you mentally exhausted! Lol

Edited March 9 by Goly

[Greyman 30,024]

Here’s dougie