Rishi Sunak and wife.

[WILF 50,057]

StackPath

WWW.INSTITUTEFORGOVERNMENT.ORG.UK

Ker-ching ! Lol 

 

[WILF 50,057]

Abandoned NHS IT system has cost £10bn so far | NHS | The Guardian

AMP.THEGUARDIAN.COM

---

<p>Bill for abortive plan, described as 'the biggest IT failure ever seen', was originally estimated to be...

Don’t forget, every penny counts ! Lol  

[JDHUNTING 1,817]

On 07/04/2022 at 12:40, WILF said:

Difference is, she hasn’t done anything illegal…..when you are as rich as that you probably don’t need to.

You have to apply and register for non dom status so I’m guessing the government also has the power to say “No” and deny it.

But they didn’t say “No”, they checked (I guess) and said “Yes” 

Simple as that.

No the difference is her husband is the chancellor of the exchequer whose responsible for deciding how much tax we all pay, if you can't see what's wrong with the chancellor of the exchequer hiding his family money to not pay tax then and also claiming furlough (again his decision) then your a lost cause and just looking for an argument. It's wrong end of. 

[WILF 50,057]

28 minutes ago, JDHUNTING said:

No the difference is her husband is the chancellor of the exchequer whose responsible for deciding how much tax we all pay, if you can't see what's wrong with the chancellor of the exchequer hiding his family money to not pay tax then and also claiming furlough (again his decision) then your a lost cause and just looking for an argument. It's wrong end of. 

I don’t  know where everyone is getting all this “hiding the money to not pay tax” ?

She paid tax on her UK income

She paid tax on her overseas income in all the relevant territories 

She did it all openly and honestly 

She didn’t pay tax on her over seas income in the UK because she had non domicile status, again, all legal and above board.

She has hidden nothing, avoided nothing and done nothing wrong……except in people minds, which is completely irrelevant really ! 
 

So no, I’m not on the wrong end of anything except maybe some small minded, petty, over emotional nonsense

Edited April 9, 2022 by WILF

[chartpolski 27,903]

Like everything to do with "tax avoidance ", ( legal), and "tax evasion", ( illegal), the waters get very muddied.

On the face of it, they have done nothing illegal, but where it gets muddied is the origional assertion that she, as an Indian passport holder couldn't become a britshish citizen because of Indian law saying you can't have dual nationality, that is why she had to become a non-Dom in the U.K.

This turned out not to be true.

Then there is the fact they both held US Green Cards, meaning that the US had to be their main domicile, but it wasn't. They say they have given up their Green Cards, but it appears not until Sunak had been Chancellor for at least 18 months.

So we had a Chancellor who apparently was a resident of a foreign country.

Maybe they haven't done anything wrong, just used the system to their best advantage.

Or maybe they, (her), have now decided to give up the non-Dom status and pay tax on overseas earnings to draw a line under the whole thing before more revelations come out ?

If everything is/was perfectly legal and above board, why volunteer to pay £20 million in taxes you don't need to ?

I don't have think we've heard the last of this.

Cheers.

[WILF 50,057]

3 minutes ago, chartpolski said:

 

If everything is/was perfectly legal and above board, why volunteer to pay £20 million in taxes you don't need to ?

 

Because of the total over reaction of an small minded public and it’s effect of possible votes maybe ? 
 

Remember when Corbyn was an anti semite or Kieth Vaz was getting f****d a both ends while out of his canister on Charlie or white Dee claimed something or the other ?……yeah, me neither ! 

[chartpolski 27,903]

1 hour ago, WILF said:

Because of the total over reaction of an small minded public and it’s effect of possible votes maybe ? 
 

Remember when Corbyn was an anti semite or Kieth Vaz was getting f****d a both ends while out of his canister on Charlie or white Dee claimed something or the other ?……yeah, me neither ! 

They are both outcasts from their own party though.

The "men in grey suits" will see to it that Rishi never becomes P.M.

Ive just been to the bookies to put my missus's voluntary yearly tax on the Grand National and asked about a price for Sunak to never become P.M......they couldn't give me a price

Cheers.

 

 

[WILF 50,057]

8 minutes ago, chartpolski said:

They are both outcasts from their own party though.

The "men in grey suits" will see to it that Rishi never becomes P.M.

Ive just been to the bookies to put my missus's voluntary yearly tax on the Grand National and asked about a price for Sunak to never become P.M......they couldn't give me a price

Cheers.

 

 

Fair one mate.

I personally believe that if they felt the need to appeal to Britains black owned cities like London, Birmingham, Leeds, Bradford, Burnley etc then they would shove him to the front in a heartbeat…….I don’t know if you are wildly over estimating these political parties sense of “right” or wether you believe there to be some other reason they would cast him aside but I personally don’t give them as much credit.

Mate, if these c**ts thought Brady & Hindley would win them an election they would have a whole team (and millions of your obligation ) paint them as just the friendly wholesome couple next door.

And mate, bet your life, some tit would vote for them.

[tatsblisters 10,955]

It's not like the Sunaks will struggle to pay this extra tax unlike the retired steelworker i was talking to this morning who's work's pension and his state pension that he has paid into has took him over the tax threshold and so he is taxed on his works pension every month.

[jukel123 9,422]

Wilf I'm going to write to HMRC and tell them you said what I owe them won't make any difference  in the overall scheme of things. Do you reckon they'll let me off?

[chartpolski 27,903]

1 minute ago, WILF said:

Fair one mate.

I personally believe that if they felt the need to appeal to Britains black owned cities like London, Birmingham, Leeds, Bradford, Burnley etc then they would shove him to the front in a heartbeat…….I don’t know if you are wildly over estimating these political parties sense of “right” or wether you believe there to be some other reason they would cast him aside but I personally don’t give them as much credit.

Mate, if these c**ts thought Brady & Hindley would win them an election they would have a whole team (and millions of your obligation ) paint them as just the friendly wholesome couple next door.

And mate, bet your life, some tit would vote for them.

You've got me wrong, Wilf !

I don't believe any of the politicians or parties have any sense of right or wrong or honour.

They only have a sense of self preservation, holding on to power and privilege, keeping their noses in the trough !

I never thought Rishi would ever become PM, even before "Taxgate" !

If he was Labour, then possibly yes, because of their ethnic base and their virtue signalling supporters.

Tory voters in the shires and Red Wall voters, in my mind, would draw the line at an Indian PM, even though they will happily accept an Etonand Oxford white privileged millionaire, such is the vagaries of the British electorate.

No, the "men in grey suits" will never allow Rishi to become PM, hence the very strong rumours the tax "scandal" originated in Number 10 !

Cheers.

[jukel123 9,422]

I remember when  my kids were small I bought them an orphan lamb each. The next year  they had lambs which we sold through auction.

You have no idea the crap I had to undergo because HMRC reckoned we owed them. I was called in twice to their office and given the once over.

3centually they agreed we didn't owe them. But talk about picking on the wee fella.

[jukel123 9,422]

Just now, chartpolski said:

You've got me wrong, Wilf !

I don't believe any of the politicians or parties have any sense of right or wrong or honour.

They only have a sense of self preservation, holding on to power and privilege, keeping their noses in the trough !

I never thought Rishi would ever become PM, even before "Taxgate" !

If he was Labour, then possibly yes, because of their ethnic base and their virtue signalling supporters.

Tory voters in the shires and Red Wall voters, in my mind, would draw the line at an Indian PM, even though they will happily accept an Etonand Oxford white privileged millionaire, such is the vagaries of the British electorate.

No, the "men in grey suits" will never allow Rishi to become PM, hence the very strong rumours the tax "scandal" originated in Number 10 !

Cheers.

Don't think brown faces go down well in the home counties.

[WILF 50,057]

12 minutes ago, jukel123 said:

Wilf I'm going to write to HMRC and tell them you said what I owe them won't make any difference  in the overall scheme of things. Do you reckon they'll let me off?

No, they will destroy your life mate.

But she didn’t owe them anything did she  

What a fickle bunch we are, last year we was calling the insulate Britain protestors all the c**ts under the sun and this year a kid is going to go hungry or freeze because of the cost of energy…….do we care ?, do we f**k ! 
We were “angry” at the protestors because they caused a few hold up to our daily lives and we are “angry” because we (wrongly) think a multi millionaire didn’t pay what we have to pay.

The sum total of what we think she got away with amounts to precisely f**k all in the grand scheme of things.

Kids are still hungry and cold mind you !

I think we are missing something here, don’t you?  

Edited April 9, 2022 by WILF

[WILF 50,057]

5 minutes ago, jukel123 said:

I remember when  my kids were small I bought them an orphan lamb each. The next year  they had lambs which we sold through auction.

You have no idea the crap I had to undergo because HMRC reckoned we owed them. I was called in twice to their office and given the once over.

3centually they agreed we didn't owe them. But talk about picking on the wee fella.

How did they find out ?