Francie 6,368 Posted November 4, 2017 Report Share Posted November 4, 2017 https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://amp.theguardian.com/environment/2009/feb/18/trees-tropics-climate-change&ved=0ahUKEwjC5cCRoqXXAhUBNhoKHYQhArwQFggnMAM&usg=AOvVaw09xhbS-TGM7Fy_1oT_8Wl3&cf=1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ChrisJones 7,975 Posted November 4, 2017 Report Share Posted November 4, 2017 2 minutes ago, Francie said: https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://phys.org/news/2017-08-pair-global-natural.amp&ved=0ahUKEwjsrvmmoaXXAhXCPBoKHdAWCZwQFgg5MAg&usg=AOvVaw2duh8pa0TlhHce56lkLXro&cf=1 There you go chris, might not suffice for ye but there you go mate. So not peer reviewed just a study from two scientists, okay. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
dave88 1,565 Posted November 4, 2017 Report Share Posted November 4, 2017 Francie....how come you can believe that trannies are taking over the world but you cant believe that humans are playing a big part in global warming lol? 1 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Francie 6,368 Posted November 4, 2017 Report Share Posted November 4, 2017 2 minutes ago, ChrisJones said: NASSS? The North American Society For Serbian Studies? Typo nasa mate lol 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Francie 6,368 Posted November 4, 2017 Report Share Posted November 4, 2017 1 minute ago, ChrisJones said: So not peer reviewed just a study from two scientists, okay. Could you tell me whats the difference in peer reviewed an the study above? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ChrisJones 7,975 Posted November 4, 2017 Report Share Posted November 4, 2017 2 minutes ago, Francie said: https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://amp.theguardian.com/environment/2009/feb/18/trees-tropics-climate-change&ved=0ahUKEwjC5cCRoqXXAhUBNhoKHYQhArwQFggnMAM&usg=AOvVaw09xhbS-TGM7Fy_1oT_8Wl3&cf=1 That one says that only a fifth of global emissions is absorbed... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ChrisJones 7,975 Posted November 4, 2017 Report Share Posted November 4, 2017 2 minutes ago, Francie said: Could you tell me whats the difference in peer reviewed an the study above? 3 Peer Review Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Francie 6,368 Posted November 4, 2017 Report Share Posted November 4, 2017 4 minutes ago, dave88 said: Francie....how come you can believe that trannies are taking over the world but you cant believe that humans are playing a big part in global warming lol? Lol there not taking over the world mate, there be used as pawns in the bigger picture, well leae that for another day mate haha Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Francie 6,368 Posted November 4, 2017 Report Share Posted November 4, 2017 1 minute ago, ChrisJones said: Peer Review Thats my point chris, the group that reviews it will all be supporters of the said topic, or will the other side peer review it also? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Francie 6,368 Posted November 4, 2017 Report Share Posted November 4, 2017 Chris could you explain to me the hypocrisy of the big coporations using vast amounts of resources, only then to pin it on joe soap, lol Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Francie 6,368 Posted November 4, 2017 Report Share Posted November 4, 2017 7 minutes ago, ChrisJones said: That one says that only a fifth of global emissions is absorbed... Yeah an that the trees an forests are geting bigger because of this extra co2, an thats just the african trees, what about all other forests around the world.. I cant see how co2 is damaging when the forests love it, could you explain your concern chris? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ChrisJones 7,975 Posted November 4, 2017 Report Share Posted November 4, 2017 (edited) 16 minutes ago, Francie said: Thats my point chris, the group that reviews it will all be supporters of the said topic, or will the other side peer review it also? That's the beauty of it mate. Peer review is where people in the community test and attempt to replicate the study. It isn't an agenda. It will either support it or not based on the conditions of the original experiment. 14 minutes ago, Francie said: Chris could you explain to me the hypocrisy of the big coporations using vast amounts of resources, only then to pin it on joe soap, lol I can't mate. I'm not denying hypocrisy I'm just saying that we're going to be having it rough for a while. I can also see the irony in the forums anti-globalists using the all the benefits of globalisation to denounce it. If we're consuming to the degree we are then surely we are part of the problem, no? Edited November 4, 2017 by ChrisJones Punctuation Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ChrisJones 7,975 Posted November 4, 2017 Report Share Posted November 4, 2017 1 minute ago, Francie said: Yeah an that the trees an forests are geting bigger because of this extra co2, an thats just the african trees, what about all other forests around the world.. I cant see how co2 is damaging when the forests love it, could you explain your concern chris? But it's still only a fifth... four-fifths aren't being absorbed can you see why that might be a concern? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ChrisJones 7,975 Posted November 4, 2017 Report Share Posted November 4, 2017 (edited) The original article you posted from the Guardian was printed 8 years ago. This article printed in 2014 challenges it. Edited November 4, 2017 by ChrisJones Spelling Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Francie 6,368 Posted November 4, 2017 Report Share Posted November 4, 2017 6 minutes ago, ChrisJones said: But it's still only a fifth... four-fifths aren't being absorbed can you see why that might be a concern? Not really no, the african forest is sucking up 1/5 of the co2, an as the study shows, the trees are loving it, an getting bigger an thicker. What about the amazon forest, or the aborial forest in russia, those two are much bigger forests the the african ones, so there bound to be sucking up another two fifths? An what about the rest of the forests around the world? How can co2 be poisonus to the planet when its obviously a plant nutrient? How about we just plant more trees problem solved mate? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.