slipper 116 Posted August 12, 2016 Report Share Posted August 12, 2016 Anyone listen to this earlier on bbc 4 radio? Just wondered how botham got on defending grouse shooting? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
dodger 2,671 Posted August 12, 2016 Report Share Posted August 12, 2016 Not a Botham or cricket fan but that Botham can talk till the cows come home so reckon he would've done alright, that packham is sickening.. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Welsh_red 4,324 Posted August 12, 2016 Report Share Posted August 12, 2016 https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/aug/12/chris-packham-using-bbc-role-to-push-grouse-shooting-ban-ian-botham-says Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Welsh_red 4,324 Posted August 12, 2016 Report Share Posted August 12, 2016 http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p044fnlg Only 6 mins long 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
dodger 2,671 Posted August 12, 2016 Report Share Posted August 12, 2016 People like that packham won't rest until folk can't even cast a line out or even back a dog or horse they want it all gone ASAP absolute shit for brains.. 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Welsh_red 4,324 Posted August 12, 2016 Report Share Posted August 12, 2016 I read in one of my shooting magazines that their are loads of celebrities that enjoy shooting but lots of their pr teams have banned it from being mentioned anywhere to stop it harming their work Quote Link to post Share on other sites
beast 1,884 Posted August 12, 2016 Report Share Posted August 12, 2016 i met that packham once, what a c**t. wish botham had wrapped his cricket bat round the back of his head like when he was swatting dennis lillee into the grandstand Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DogFox123 1,379 Posted August 13, 2016 Report Share Posted August 13, 2016 (edited) He's a right two-faced c**t. He's anti-hunting yet calls for people to stop trying to save the Tiger and concentrate on other animals. Doesn't he know it's hunting that nearly wiped the species out..... Edited August 13, 2016 by DogFox123 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DIDO.1 21,041 Posted August 13, 2016 Report Share Posted August 13, 2016 I think it's more population expansion that puts tigers and panda's at risk. I agree with him on that one to be fair....panda's are proper pretentious cnuts Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DogFox123 1,379 Posted August 13, 2016 Report Share Posted August 13, 2016 I think it's more population expansion that puts tigers and panda's at risk. I agree with him on that one to be fair....panda's are proper pretentious cnuts I don't, we near enough wiped out Tigers due to hunting. It's our duty to preserve them IMO..... Quote Link to post Share on other sites
ChrisJones 7,973 Posted August 14, 2016 Report Share Posted August 14, 2016 He's a right two-faced c**t. He's anti-hunting yet calls for people to stop trying to save the Tiger and concentrate on other animals. Doesn't he know it's hunting that nearly wiped the species out..... Ironically it could be quota hunting that could save many species. Big value hunting tags can turn poacher to gamekeeper. Hunting may have decimated high prized animals but it's poaching that will finish it off. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
arcticgun 4,548 Posted August 14, 2016 Report Share Posted August 14, 2016 Pacham is a fool beefy got it right imho I doubt the rich would give two tosses what the poor try too tell them too do on their own land. I was out on 12th and seen three different birds of prey on same moor, plus a fourth near one of the other places they shoot on seen plenty other species of bird n animal too it's as much about conserving the moor as shooting what's on it plenty rare birds suffer due too rspb types locating and messing with nests counting eggs n tagging young uns however when that goes wrong they simply blame keepers for shooting them if people don't like grouse shooting them best they keep clear of the moors lol Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DIDO.1 21,041 Posted August 14, 2016 Report Share Posted August 14, 2016 I think it's more population expansion that puts tigers and panda's at risk. I agree with him on that one to be fair....panda's are proper pretentious cnuts I don't, we near enough wiped out Tigers due to hunting. It's our duty to preserve them IMO..... Yeah but not panda's . Smug cnuts..can't even be arsed having sex cos they think they are so special Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jiggy 3,208 Posted August 14, 2016 Report Share Posted August 14, 2016 I think it's more population expansion that puts tigers and panda's at risk. I agree with him on that one to be fair....panda's are proper pretentious cnuts I don't, we near enough wiped out Tigers due to hunting. It's our duty to preserve them IMO.....Yeah but not panda's . Smug cnuts..can't even be arsed having sex cos they think they are so specialshow them some panda porn dvds they will soon get hot and sweaty. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.