SirRichardCecil 70 Posted April 5, 2014 Report Share Posted April 5, 2014 (edited) Is it just me or do other members think the mods are getting a bit trigger happy. Baw was controversial yes but he kept a bit of banter going that's for sure. I had a topic deleted last Sunday no explanation why! it had no illegal content or arguing it was just deleted for no reason while members were posting on it! ETA. Paulus and malt online at the moment so lets see how long this lasts. Edited April 5, 2014 by SirRichardCecil Link to post
J Darcy 5,871 Posted April 5, 2014 Report Share Posted April 5, 2014 It's a Nazi state! :laugh: 2 Link to post
SirRichardCecil 70 Posted April 5, 2014 Author Report Share Posted April 5, 2014 The old mods like you and millet were better that's for sure JD. Link to post
fireman 10,774 Posted April 5, 2014 Report Share Posted April 5, 2014 No Baw was a little shit stirrer and nothing else,the thing is once you let a little bit of rot set in the problem will just get worse and it won't be long before it all comes tumbling down. 10 Link to post
Popular Post J Darcy 5,871 Posted April 5, 2014 Popular Post Report Share Posted April 5, 2014 Baw got what he wanted, he did not post anything about hunting, just insulted people. A troll. That's the kind of thing that stops people with real knowledge posting. They can't post for fear of getting pounced upon and ripped the pi$$ out of. Some people just don't want the hassle, and it's a shame. 21 Link to post
SirRichardCecil 70 Posted April 5, 2014 Author Report Share Posted April 5, 2014 Yes he did stir but the simple answer to that is do not bite. 1 Link to post
blackmaggie 3,375 Posted April 5, 2014 Report Share Posted April 5, 2014 I think baw had a good run this time and I think a few would of been banned earlier for some of his comments I think he thrived on getting folks backs up and sooner or later he knew himself he would go but he did get topics going no doudt he will be back Link to post
SirRichardCecil 70 Posted April 5, 2014 Author Report Share Posted April 5, 2014 Not just him though JD a lot don't post for fear of being jumped on and questioned off folk who know little or nothing about running dogs. 5 Link to post
SirRichardCecil 70 Posted April 5, 2014 Author Report Share Posted April 5, 2014 So baw deserved a ban? most seem to think yes I took very little notice of him TBH What about topics being deleted without good reason? Link to post
R.A.W 1,987 Posted April 5, 2014 Report Share Posted April 5, 2014 What was the final straw with Baw.?..........................I'm a poet too Link to post
forest of dean redneck 11,193 Posted April 5, 2014 Report Share Posted April 5, 2014 Is baw banned? Link to post
R.A.W 1,987 Posted April 5, 2014 Report Share Posted April 5, 2014 Is baw banned? I think so Link to post
SirRichardCecil 70 Posted April 5, 2014 Author Report Share Posted April 5, 2014 One mod even admitted he locked a topic while he was away doing something as he didn't want to miss anything ffs. How many of the mods who moderate the lurcher section actually have lurchers and do a bit with them? Link to post
R.A.W 1,987 Posted April 5, 2014 Report Share Posted April 5, 2014 One mod even admitted he locked a topic while he was away doing something as he didn't want to miss anything ffs. How many of the mods who moderate the lurcher section actually have lurchers and do a bit with them? I can honestly say I haven't had any issues as long as you have a bit of common sense then you shouldn't have a problem. By the sound of things you've been on before and that didn't go well either ? Do you need a dog to see someone being a Kunt ?........................... 5 Link to post
forest of dean redneck 11,193 Posted April 5, 2014 Report Share Posted April 5, 2014 Is baw banned? I think so Yeah I just looked Baw if your reading this Hahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha 4 Link to post
Recommended Posts