Jump to content

The Hunting Act


Guest Leveller

Recommended Posts

Guest Leveller

Statistics relating to Hunting Act convictions in 2010 show that the Act is “now about poaching, not about hunting†say Countryside Alliance. The statistics show 36 convictions under the Act in 2010, but only one involving a hunt registered with the Council of Hunting Associations*. The rest were for offences, primarily poaching, that are not connected to organised hunting. Poaching has been an offence for many hundreds of years and existing legislation enables the Police to secure convictions for the offence outwith the Hunting Act.

 

The new Ministry of Justice figures take the number of people convicted between the Hunting Act coming into force in 2005 to the end of 2010 to 181, but only six of those relate to registered hunts. 97% of convictions relate to poaching or other casual hunting activities, including at least seven people who have been convicted of hunting rats.

 

Countryside Alliance Chief Executive Alice Barnard commented: “The Hunting Act is being used almost exclusively by the Police to tackle poaching, lending a veneer of success-through-numbers to an Act that is now almost unanimously regarded as a dismal failure. Poaching was illegal before the Act and would continue to be illegal without it.“

 

The MPs who railroaded the Hunting Act through in late 2004 acted out of spite and without any recourse to evidence or to the practicalities of what they were doing. The result is a piece of legislation that has comprehensively failed and these statistics hold a mirror up to that fact.

 

"The Act, however, does continue to be a way for animal rights vigilantes to make allegations against hunts and waste Police, CPS and Court time, often at huge cost to taxpayers. No one takes any pleasure in the current situation. It is farcical and there is no case to be made that the Act is effective in any way.â€

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

"The Act, however, does continue to be a way for animal rights vigilantes to make allegations against hunts and waste Police, CPS and Court time, often at huge cost to taxpayers. No one takes any pleasure in the current situation. It is farcical and there is no case to be made that the Act is effective in any way.â€

 

:clapper:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hunting rats? I assume those 'cases' involve trespassing / no permission? That can be adequately dealt with under existing laws and not The Cunting Act, or has this fooken island finally gone doo f*****g lally?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Trespassing i believe is not a criminal offence but i think that trespassing in pursuit of game ie rabbits is..in other words you cant get arrested for going on the land ..only if you are poaching...but am sre somebody knows the details...

Link to post
Share on other sites

the hunting act is a complete joke it didnt doesnt please anyone and even blair in his autobiography said it was one of his biggest regrets pushing it through .for christs sake how can it be cruel to chase a fox or hare but not a rabbit or rat complete and utter nonsense the only saving grace is the loopholes that were left in the hunting act .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...