Ratreeper 441 Posted April 16, 2009 Report Share Posted April 16, 2009 Well, as the threads called, whys the dogo argentino on the dangerous dogs act? or i should say, why is the dogo, but not others Quote Link to post Share on other sites
mick 7 Posted April 16, 2009 Report Share Posted April 16, 2009 Why are any of them Mick.. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
kristian 9 Posted April 16, 2009 Report Share Posted April 16, 2009 Why are any of themMick.. Exactly what i was gonna write! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Ratreeper 441 Posted April 16, 2009 Author Report Share Posted April 16, 2009 Why are any of themMick.. buggered if i know, i am just trying to get the smallest shred of common sense out of it. As far as i can tell they seem to have the idea that banning a breed some how prevents bad owners. But why the dogo argentino, whats it ever done to get their crosshairs on it? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
gnasher16 29,754 Posted April 16, 2009 Report Share Posted April 16, 2009 In my opinion the reason this breed is on the list is the same as the reason the tosa is on the list....it makes it " look like " the dda is not specifically pointing the finger at the pit bull......even though there has never been a breed known as the dogo argentina on these shores and only ever 1 japanese tosa... It also helps that neither are kc recognised breeds,have a fighting background and have a vaguely similar look to the pit bull......................the only reason the good old staffordshire bull terrier escaped the list is that theres money to be made as its a kc registered breed.....yet their look and background have more similarities than any of the other listed breeds......corrupt,senseless....and pure bollocks are all words that spring to mind when it comes to the dda theres no point trying to make sense of it as there never was any. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Wolly 4 Posted April 16, 2009 Report Share Posted April 16, 2009 In my opinion the reason this breed is on the list is the same as the reason the tosa is on the list....it makes it " look like " the dda is not specifically pointing the finger at the pit bull......even though there has never been a breed known as the dogo argentina on these shores and only ever 1 japanese tosa...It also helps that neither are kc recognised breeds,have a fighting background and have a vaguely similar look to the pit bull......................the only reason the good old staffordshire bull terrier escaped the list is that theres money to be made as its a kc registered breed.....yet their look and background have more similarities than any of the other listed breeds......corrupt,senseless....and pure bollocks are all words that spring to mind when it comes to the dda theres no point trying to make sense of it as there never was any. Couldnt have Said It Any Better Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Ratreeper 441 Posted April 16, 2009 Author Report Share Posted April 16, 2009 about as much as i expected the older i get, the more i really f*****g hate the way this country is run. I used to laugh at older people moaning, but the sheer ignorance people can get away with in such priveleged, apparently educated and trusted positions is utterly infathomable. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
dogman89 0 Posted April 17, 2009 Report Share Posted April 17, 2009 In my opinion the reason this breed is on the list is the same as the reason the tosa is on the list....it makes it " look like " the dda is not specifically pointing the finger at the pit bull......even though there has never been a breed known as the dogo argentina on these shores and only ever 1 japanese tosa...It also helps that neither are kc recognised breeds,have a fighting background and have a vaguely similar look to the pit bull......................the only reason the good old staffordshire bull terrier escaped the list is that theres money to be made as its a kc registered breed.....yet their look and background have more similarities than any of the other listed breeds......corrupt,senseless....and pure bollocks are all words that spring to mind when it comes to the dda theres no point trying to make sense of it as there never was any. i did work eperiance witht the council and he told me that thats the reason others were added to the list, so that it didnt look like they were pointing the finger at just the pit bull Quote Link to post Share on other sites
MATTI 34 Posted April 17, 2009 Report Share Posted April 17, 2009 [bANNED TEXT] THIS PLACE WAS A EMPIRE WE WAS LEED BY A EMPROIRE. [bANNED TEXT] WE WAS A KINGDOM WE WAS LEED BY A KING. KNOW WE ARE A COUNTRY WE ARE LEED BY A C**T. Keep off the drink or go back to school, cabbage. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
themayor 1 Posted April 17, 2009 Report Share Posted April 17, 2009 wats wrong with that? thats short hand read it tidy Quote Link to post Share on other sites
gnasher16 29,754 Posted April 18, 2009 Report Share Posted April 18, 2009 i did work eperiance witht the council and he told me that thats the reason others were added to the list, so that it didnt look like they were pointing the finger at just the pit bull What other reason could it be....they banned breeds of dog that were never even here !...its like banning the north african spotted flying terrier....not only has there never been any in britain but not many people have ever heard of them.......it was a gutless and senseless piece of legislation. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.