Princess Andrew the commoner?

[jukel123 9,929]

9 hours ago, WILF said:

He rattled his way through 40 brasses on a jolly you say ??…….f**k sake, make the man King right away ! 

Why not? He likes dressing up. He'd be as good as any of them.

He might not moan so much about the "stinking pens" he's given to sign documents with, unlike Charlie boy, who, after all, only wants to be "Camilla's tampax" .Now there's a gruesome thought.

At least Andrew left his royal seed in third world teenagers and and didn't spaff it into his own type, which may have spawned another chinless brat for us to provide for.

Edited Friday at 08:27 by jukel123

[WILF 51,311]

4 minutes ago, jukel123 said:

Why not? He likes dressing up. He'd be as good as any of them.

He might not moan so much about the "stinking pens" he's given to sign documents with, unlike Charlie boy who, after all, only wants to be "Camilla's tampax" .Now there's a gruesome thought.

At least Andrew left his royal seed in third world teenagers and and didn't spaff it into his own type, which may have spawned another chinless brat for us to provide for.

It’s f***ing cringe worthy really isn’t it mate, maybe it’s time to convene a witan and chose somebody who is upto the job ?…….

[jukel123 9,929]

13 minutes ago, WILF said:

Every organisation is a reflection of the bloke at the top…..little wonder then that our monarchy has been reduced to a joke with that utter f***ing lettuce as King !

There are still some top notch people in the general British nobility that consists of various dukes and barons and lords, the very best of old England types……let us not forget that Winston Churchill wasn’t some lad off the plot, he was proper old money nobility.

Just the pricks at the top reflect badly on everyone, they are in many ways perfect for the country Britian has become, a true symbol of total wank !

I don't agree with that. When a member of a respected organisation is shown to be a wrong un, people kind of comfort themselves by applying the rotten apple principle.

But what if most the aristocracy are useless parasitic b*****ds? What if the Catholic church doesn't have the odd paedo priest and psychotic nun but is overrun with them?

People also believe such and such an organisation was bad in the past but is not like that in these modern times. But what if these organisations have always been corrupt and will continue to be so?

Spin is a very powerful weapon. Spin doctors assure us that the popes of the past were fornicating,murderous perverts on an industrial scale, but are holy innocents now.

That king Henry V111 was a one off , and his murders and shaggings are not representative of royal behaviour now.

Nah. I don't buy it.

[jukel123 9,929]

8 minutes ago, WILF said:

It’s f***ing cringe worthy really isn’t it mate, maybe it’s time to convene a witan and chose somebody who is upto the job ?…….

"Witan". New word for me. Had to look it up. Cheers.

[ditchman 3,747]

they are cleaning and doing the garden of the AirB&B next to me.................i hope to feck they are not dumping him there...he will make an awful mess of putting the bins out on a thursday with all the crispy tissues in them

[WILF 51,311]

12 minutes ago, jukel123 said:

I don't agree with that. When a member of a respected organisation is shown to be a wrong un, people kind of comfort themselves by applying the rotten apple principle.

But what if most the aristocracy are useless parasitic b*****ds? What if the Catholic church doesn't have the odd paedo priest and psychotic nun but is overrun with them?

People also believe such and such an organisation was bad in the past but is not like that in these modern times. But what if these organisations have always been corrupt and will continue to be so?

Spin is a very powerful weapon. Spin doctors assure us that the popes of the past were fornicating,murderous perverts on an industrial scale, but are holy innocents now.

That king Henry V111 was a one off , and his murders and shaggings are not representative of royal behaviour now.

Nah. I don't buy it.

I think we have to be careful there because church and nation are two different things.

The hypocrisy of the church is stinking !…..period, but we have to be careful not to let that undermine the Christian principals that built our society….and we have allowed that !

The undermining of our religion has been one of the major factors in the decline of our society, sense of nationhood and that has been completely deliberate ! 
 

The aristocracy on the other hand, well, King Henry may have been feasting and f***ing his way round England but he was always in Englands corner so to speak, the same gos for all the time we were ruled by the aristocracy…..the proof is in the pudding, they made us the greater nation on Earth and governed it with 16 people in the foreign office ! 
They didn’t work to the rule of “what’s good?” like the church should, they worked to the rule of “what’s  makes our nation greater ?” 

And a great nation that ran on Christian principals didn’t turn out that bad for a while did it ?……then along comes a load of c**ts after the war and destroys it all. 

Two different things imho mate. 
 

Edited Friday at 08:38 by WILF

[WILF 51,311]

10 minutes ago, jukel123 said:

"Witan". New word for me. Had to look it up. Cheers.

Alfred the Great had to be rubber stamped by a witan and that didn’t turn out to be a bad decision did it. 

[WILF 51,311]

I’ll just add, I think the wages of having people who are more concerned with being and looking “right on”, trying to be all things to all people are there for all to see in our outcomes……can anyone hand on heart say we are a better nation now than we was in 1900 ?

And I don’t mean “well we had rickets and no 50 inch tellys”, I mean more sane, more dynamic, more gentlemanly, more moral ? 

[Lenmcharristar 10,372]

12 hours ago, mackem said:

What's going to happen to Fergie?I can't imagine Texas oil barons are queuing up to suck her toes nowadays.

 

She can get a job on a ghost train scaring the absolute shite out of the kids on the ride with that face

[mackem 30,273]

7 hours ago, Aussie Whip said:

 apart from the 5mins with the young hooker and that certainly cost him .

The former Duke of York
He had twelve million quid
He gave it to someone he never knew
For something he never did

 

[WILF 51,311]

42 minutes ago, mackem said:

The former Duke of York
He had twelve million quid
He gave it to someone he never knew
For something he never did

 

She looks terrified ! 

[mackem 30,273]

7 minutes ago, WILF said:

She looks terrified ! 

He looks Randy Andy the playboy prince (as the press used to dub him).

[mackem 30,273]

14 minutes ago, WILF said:

She looks terrified ! 

In reality not one of us knows what happened behind closed doors or off the public stage,its all speculative,but he is a sleazebag and £12 million quid is a fair old whack to pay out for nothing that happened,draw your own conclusions.

[WILF 51,311]

14 minutes ago, mackem said:

In reality not one of us knows what happened behind closed doors or off the public stage,its all speculative,but he is a sleazebag and £12 million quid is a fair old whack to pay out for nothing that happened,draw your own conclusions.

I don’t read too much into that in an age where you are damned if you do and damned if you don’t and it’s all other people’s money anyway…….

[mackem 30,273]

1 minute ago, WILF said:

I don’t read too much into that in an age where you are damned if you do and damned if you don’t and it’s all other people’s money anyway…….

£12 mil even someone else's cash is still a fair old wedge to him.I think theres more to the story,personally I would rather be damned if I don't and not give the cash if I am damned either way.