Jump to content

Epstein files.


Recommended Posts

Just now, TOMO said:

How did you guess....lol

I've revealed this before. Wilf is a secret black fella. All the anti black stuff is just self hatred

 It's very common amongst rightists. It's called rejection of my black self syndrome.If it isn't it called that it should be.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 84
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Let's be honest...as long as it's about someone's favorite person they dont care and they will make excuses because " well hell that's my guy they would NEVER !"  I legitimately feel a large amou

Exactly this.  Personally I'd hang genuine nonces. But to have the highest order of punishment then you need high standards in definitions and proof. A member of the royal family or politician ca

It’s just silly isn’t it, like let’s apply this silly way of thinking to a post the other day: Jukel said a bloke at his fishing club had been accused of something…..seeing as they were in the sa

Posted Images

3 minutes ago, TOMO said:

That it Sam Smith who was mentioned on this thread a few posts back....he's a gay singer...and that is part of his act

He's quite nice tbf. Would he stoop to shag a leftie or would that be too low down? Ask him next time you see him.please.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, jukel123 said:

I'm lost mate after all I only have half a brain. Do you want me to write no not everybody who has fished with the alleged beast is a perv? 

If so I'm happy to write it.

But you are inferring anyone who ever hung round with an accused sex offender, thug or woman beater is also like that and must have known……so which is it ? 
 

You said anyone that was a friend of Jeffery Epstein was also part of all that……so were they or wasn’t they ? 
 

I don’t think it, you obviously do…..otherwise what’s the point about Trump having McGregor and Tate over for afternoon tea ?…….what point were you making if not to infer a character flaw ?

I don’t think you have a character flaw and a soft spot for potential (not convicted) beasts…..but you do !

Go away and rethink your logic mate….you're making a tit of yourself ! lol 

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

ALL the media reported 150000. That was the figure given them by the police.

The policecalways downplay numbers on a march. Best Countryside Alliance, a strike or the war against Iraq.

But they can't get away with a direct misquote. Tate would have his lawyers all over it.

If you don't like the message...blame the messenger.

Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, jukel123 said:

People only hear and see what they want to . Except me who has a razor like ability to focus on the unadulterated truth. Joke ffs.

Do you think Derbyshire is telling lies?

Yes Derbyshire was repeating a line without giving the context 100%.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, jukel123 said:

ALL the media reported 150000. That was the figure given them by the police.

The policecalways downplay numbers on a march. Best Countryside Alliance, a strike or the war against Iraq.

But they can't get away with a direct misquote. Tate would have his lawyers all over it.

If you don't like the message...blame the messenger.

Yes 100% Tate gets mis quoted and quoted out of context. I've seen examples numerous times. Just like with Charlie Kirk. One line quoted out of an entire conversation totally out of context. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, WILF said:

But you are inferring anyone who ever hung round with an accused sex offender, thug or woman beater is also like that and must have known……so which is it ? 
 

You said anyone that was a friend of Jeffery Epstein was also part of all that……so were they or wasn’t they ? 
 

I don’t think it, you obviously do…..otherwise what’s the point about Trump having McGregor and Tate over for afternoon tea ?…….what point were you making if not to infer a character flaw ?

I don’t think you have a character flaw and a soft spot for potential (not convicted) beasts…..but you do !

Go away and rethink your logic mate….you're making a tit of yourself ! lol 

Christ Wilf you are clutching at straws.  There's an old saying' you can judge a man by the company he keeps.'

Trump deliberately associated himself with the Tates and McGregor because a lot of his supporters are young white  rednecks , blacks and Hispanics. Polls show this. He said himself" I love the uneducated".

They lap up the violent messages that Trump Tate and Mcgregor give out. They are powerless so a simple message that you can get what you want by violence appeals to them. Violent films and presumably violent porn has the same attraction. Because they can imagine themselves as the ' heroes' in such depictions.

I dont like the term toxic masculinity because there's such a thing g as toxic feminity too.

How about  thick as pig shit,knuckle dragging  neanderthal masculinity?

Edited by jukel123
Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, WILF said:

But you are inferring anyone who ever hung round with an accused sex offender, thug or woman beater is also like that and must have known……so which is it ? 
 

You said anyone that was a friend of Jeffery Epstein was also part of all that……so were they or wasn’t they ? 
 

I don’t think it, you obviously do…..otherwise what’s the point about Trump having McGregor and Tate over for afternoon tea ?…….what point were you making if not to infer a character flaw ?

I don’t think you have a character flaw and a soft spot for potential (not convicted) beasts…..but you do !

Go away and rethink your logic mate….you're making a tit of yourself ! lol 

Can’t see the forest for the tress springs to mind here lol 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Bendigo said:

Yes 100% Tate gets mis quoted and quoted out of context. I've seen examples numerous times. Just like with Charlie Kirk. One line quoted out of an entire conversation totally out of context. 

 

Behave. They said what they said End of. Tate took a lot of his videos down when his legal troubles started.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you call form an orderly line to attack my viewpoints please. You only have five minutes because my Mrs wants a cup of tea( how girlie and leftie is that? Sorry lads I'm weak.

Then  we are watching Killing Eve. We've only watched a few episodes but I get more sense of that psycho serial killer than you lads tonight.

Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, jukel123 said:

Behave. They said what they said End of. Tate took a lot of his videos down when his legal troubles started.

Ok

He said these things but somehow managed to make them all disappear from the Internet....but the leftists, feminazis, school teachers and you all know it really happened so all fall in line and just accept it like good citizens 

Edited by Bendigo
Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, jukel123 said:

Christ Wilf you are clutching at straws.  There's an old saying' you can judge a man by the company he keeps.'

 

Can you ?, lucky I’m not like that and judging you that way isn’t it.

And look, when it comes to Epstein I’ll tell everyone a more logical theory as to why those people were on that island.

JE was in finance, he was obviously a major networker, the people he gathered around him were also mega wealthy…..so what do you do?….you say “Here, get on my private jet and come and have a holiday on my island” and while they are there you casually mention some latest fund you are managing and wouldn’t They like to drop a 100 million in it because the King of Botswana and John Travolta just did ! 
That sounds much more plausible than 200 of the most famous faces on planet earth who are constantly under media scrutiny thinking “yeah, let’s fly off and nonce some under age girls….what could possibly go wrong ?” 
 

I don’t know it for a fact but my logical, non hysterical head says that’s more likely the case……not very exciting I know !

Edited by WILF
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, jukel123 said:

Can you call form an orderly line to attack my viewpoints please. You only have five minutes because my Mrs wants a cup of tea( how girlie and leftie is that? Sorry lads I'm weak.

Then  we are watching Killing Eve. We've only watched a few episodes but I get more sense of that psycho serial killer than you lads tonight.

Nobody attacks your viewpoint when you don’t talk shit….theres a motto for you to remember old chap ! lol 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...