1969 moon landing

[Francie, 3,042]

1 minute ago, chartpolski said:

So all the other Space Agencies in the world that are tracking it are either in on the hoax or are being fooled ?

Of course it’s orbiting the earth, its orbiting twice, the second orbit will be elliptical, to enable the “slingshot “ effect to get out of earth’s gravitational pull and on its way to the moon , then it will use the moon’s gravitational pull to obtain an orbit around the moon, then use its booster rocket to leave the moons gravity and head back to earth, were the earths gravity takes over and pulls it back down.

It isn’t pointed at the moon and fired straight at it .

Cheers.

Lol yeah i know all that charts lol an the stages it goes through to get there,im on the fence with it all,its crazy the arguments over it lol

Well i hope its the indian space crowd,there "footage" of landing on the moon was obviously cgi,definatley wasnt real,looked like a shitty cartoon lol

Wonder if there will be any good footage of it slingshotting out of our atmosphere into space?

[mC HULL 18,543]

5 minutes ago, chartpolski said:

So all the other Space Agencies in the world that are tracking it are either in on the hoax or are being fooled ?

Of course it’s orbiting the earth, its orbiting twice, the second orbit will be elliptical, to enable the “slingshot “ effect to get out of earth’s gravitational pull and on its way to the moon , then it will use the moon’s gravitational pull to obtain an orbit around the moon, then use its booster rocket to leave the moons gravity and head back to earth, were the earths gravity takes over and pulls it back down.

It isn’t pointed at the moon and fired straight at it .

Cheers.

so that little rocket to get back to.earth isn't effected by the moon gravitational pull ? After all it must be strong to pull that from earth 200 k miles away this wouldn't con a kid mate its 2025 not  1965

[Francie, 3,042]

7 minutes ago, chartpolski said:

So all the other Space Agencies in the world that are tracking it are either in on the hoax or are being fooled ?

Of course it’s orbiting the earth, its orbiting twice, the second orbit will be elliptical, to enable the “slingshot “ effect to get out of earth’s gravitational pull and on its way to the moon , then it will use the moon’s gravitational pull to obtain an orbit around the moon, then use its booster rocket to leave the moons gravity and head back to earth, were the earths gravity takes over and pulls it back down.

It isn’t pointed at the moon and fired straight at it .

Cheers.

So in that respect charts,did the other missions to the moon in the past like apollo,did they have to go up into earths orbit an circle around then slingshot of into space like artemmis,or did they just go up an out of our atmosphere?

[mC HULL 18,543]

2 minutes ago, Francie, said:

Lol yeah i know all that charts lol an the stages it goes through to get there,im on the fence with it all,its crazy the arguments over it lol

Well i hope its the indian space crowd,there "footage" of landing on the moon was obviously cgi,definatley wasnt real,looked like a shitty cartoon lol

Wonder if there will be any good footage of it slingshotting out of our atmosphere into space?

Von braun said a rocket has enough power to.get to earths atmosphere then would need refuelling and another 6 times after that but hes just the father of rockets that would he know ? 

[Francie, 3,042]

Just now, mC HULL said:

Von braun said a rocket has enough power to.get to earths atmosphere then would need refuelling and another 6 times after that but hes just the father of rockets that would he know ? 

I actually seen that interview of him mac,what does the nasa lovers say about that? Ghat would be interesting to here there counter on what he said.

[mC HULL 18,543]

35 minutes ago, chartpolski said:

Yeah but as soon as it got out of sight it came down in Mojave desert and was replaced by CG, the real technology is how those damned yanks fooled all the Russians, Chinese, Indians, Australians, British, Europeans and the other world governments that are tracking it .

Dont you know that nothing can leave the earths atmosphere, every space launch in history has been a con ?

Those 10,000 people who watched the launch were paid actors, the hundreds of thousands working on the project are sworn to secrecy and will be visited by the men in black suits if they spill the beans !

Cheers.

No they all saw the launch the arc lol 

Same as they said if you wanted to fake the first moon landings all you need is a maximum  of 8 people in on it the rest are like us listening to people telling us whats happening and repeating it 

Edited yesterday at 08:44 by mC HULL

[chartpolski 30,096]

1 minute ago, mC HULL said:

No they all saw the launch the arc lol 

Same as they said if you wanted to fake the first moon landings all you need is a maximum  of 8 people in on it the rest are like us listening to people telling us whats happening and repeating it 

So Russia and China are in on it ?

Cheers.

[mC HULL 18,543]

Just now, chartpolski said:

So Russia and China are in on it ?

Cheers.

In on what ? The russians started the lie there not going to blow there own story up are they ? If you could  get to the moon china would all ready be building skyscrapers on it mate 

[Francie, 3,042]

17 minutes ago, Francie, said:

So in that respect charts,did the other missions to the moon in the past like apollo,did they have to go up into earths orbit an circle around then slingshot of into space like artemmis,or did they just go up an out of our atmosphere?

Do you know mate?

[steve66 4,064]

[mC HULL 18,543]

I look at like this thr russians were light years ahead a the usa in rockets hit the moon with one in the 50s give the president a souvenir on a trip didnt they 

Now the yanks were maybe behind in rocket tech but they were light years ahead in Hollywood and propaganda 

[mC HULL 18,543]

I cant look at theses artemedis 2 pics there comical aint they francie wow lol

[chartpolski 30,096]

15 minutes ago, Francie, said:

I actually seen that interview of him mac,what does the nasa lovers say about that? Ghat would be interesting to here there counter on what he said.

Let’s take a look at what he actually said and what he didn’t say;

so what he ACTUALLY said was that he FAVOURED refuelling stations against direct launch massive rockets.

What he DIDN’T say was rockets COULDN’T leave earths atmosphere without refuelling.

Quite obviously NASA went down the “massive launch rocket “ route, rather than the “more  sophisticated refuelling route“, ( his words, not mine).

Its easy to cherry pick comments to suit a narrative, it’s different when reading his full comments

Cheers.

[mC HULL 18,543]

5 minutes ago, chartpolski said:

Let’s take a look at what he actually said and what he didn’t say;

so what he ACTUALLY said was that he FAVOURED refuelling stations against direct launch massive rockets.

What he DIDN’T say was rockets COULDN’T leave earths atmosphere without refuelling.

Quite obviously NASA went down the “massive launch rocket “ route, rather than the “more  sophisticated refuelling route“, ( his words, not mine).

Its easy to cherry pick comments to suit a narrative, it’s different when reading his full comments

Cheers.

Ill find the video of him with a chalk board behind him explaining it mate  

[chartpolski 30,096]

9 minutes ago, mC HULL said:

I look at like this thr russians were light years ahead a the usa in rockets hit the moon with one in the 50s give the president a souvenir on a trip didnt they 

Now the yanks were maybe behind in rocket tech but they were light years ahead in Hollywood and propaganda 

So you’re saying the Russians put a rocket on the moon in the 50’s but the amicans can’t do it now and net have ? 
Make your mind up.

Cheers.