Francie, 2,809 Posted February 4 Author Report Share Posted February 4 Just now, Goly said: But he didn't ban marrying minors did he? Why would you say that Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Goly 1,823 Posted February 4 Report Share Posted February 4 (edited) 6 minutes ago, Francie, said: But anyway back on topic,nowhere in the bible does it allow to marry a child,its sick an this is 2025 an people still stick up for these people,the mind boggles. Did King Richard II go against the Bible when he married 6 year old Isabella? They vowed not to consummate their marriage until she reached 12, that makes It alright then. Edited February 4 by Goly Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Goly 1,823 Posted February 4 Report Share Posted February 4 5 minutes ago, Francie, said: Why would you say that See above. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Goly 1,823 Posted February 4 Report Share Posted February 4 8 minutes ago, Francie, said: But anyway back on topic,nowhere in the bible does it allow to marry a child,its sick an this is 2025 an people still stick up for these people,the mind boggles. I agree, we have moved on from backward practices that are in the Bible and the Quran, spoken like a true atheist mate! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Francie, 2,809 Posted February 4 Author Report Share Posted February 4 3 minutes ago, Goly said: Did King Richard II go against the Bible when he married 6 year old Isabella? They vowed not to consummate their marriage until she reached 12, that makes It alright then. I thought I read years ago the marriage was never consummated goly? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
scotty12 3,814 Posted February 4 Report Share Posted February 4 27 minutes ago, Goly said: Well if it's good enough for the bible and bulldog breeders. Then it's good enough for all the royals and elites around the world 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Francie, 2,809 Posted February 4 Author Report Share Posted February 4 1 minute ago, Goly said: I agree, we have moved on from backward practices that are in the Bible and the Quran, spoken like a true atheist mate! Marrying young used to be the tradition apparently back then,tho that didn't mean it was consummated at the time of marriage. 3 minutes ago, Goly said: I agree, we have moved on from backward practices that are in the Bible and the Quran, spoken like a true atheist mate! Seems we haven't if you look at certain countries in the world Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Goly 1,823 Posted February 4 Report Share Posted February 4 1 minute ago, Francie, said: Marrying young used to be the tradition apparently back then,tho that didn't mean it was consummated at the time of marriage. Seems we haven't if you look at certain countries in the world Did you read what I put? He agreed to wait until she was 12 before they consummated the marriage, luckily he died before he could get his wicked way. Give them time, once they free themselves from the constraints of their holy book like we did, they will see sense. I take it you're now a big fan of Dawkins & Hitchens? Lol Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Goly 1,823 Posted February 4 Report Share Posted February 4 Further evidence of their backwards views, especially towards women. The legal age of marriage for girls has been lowered to 9 and 15, down from 18 for boys. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Francie, 2,809 Posted February 4 Author Report Share Posted February 4 2 hours ago, Goly said: Did you read what I put? He agreed to wait until she was 12 before they consummated the marriage, luckily he died before he could get his wicked way. Give them time, once they free themselves from the constraints of their holy book like we did, they will see sense. I take it you're now a big fan of Dawkins & Hitchens? Lol Wash your mouth out lol Dawkins Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Goly 1,823 Posted February 4 Report Share Posted February 4 4 minutes ago, Francie, said: Wash your mouth out lol Dawkins He's your new God mate, embrace him. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
YOKEL 2,343 Posted February 4 Report Share Posted February 4 2 hours ago, Francie, said: I think your logic is stupid mate lol Think about what your saying,create unrelated humans lol,what does relation mean? Same family,so if God created say five adam an Eve's,how would they be unrelated lol your not making sense at all Surely by that rationale, all humans are still related? At what point did some develop different skin colours, was it sun burn that didn't clear up? Surely a god that had the ability to creat different trees, fish, insects etc could at least rustle up some unrelated humans? And why choose the middle east to start it all? Although wasn't it that black woman out of Africa who dated as the first, or did satan put her there as a joke? Yokel 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Goly 1,823 Posted February 4 Report Share Posted February 4 1 minute ago, YOKEL said: Surely by that rationale, all humans are still related? At what point did some develop different skin colours, was it sun burn that didn't clear up? Surely a god that had the ability to creat different trees, fish, insects etc could at least rustle up some unrelated humans? And why choose the middle east to start it all? Although wasn't it that black woman out of Africa who dated as the first, or did satan put her there as a joke? Yokel The creationists lose all their logic when they try and manoeuvre around posing questions. I mean how can they explain archaic humans that have been around for millions of years? And more recent humans like the Neanderthal, still around half a million years old. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
chartpolski 27,866 Posted February 4 Report Share Posted February 4 1 hour ago, YOKEL said: Although wasn't it that black woman out of Africa who dated as the first, or did satan put her there as a joke? Yokel Lucy , Austrolalopithecus Afarensis. Cheers. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Goly 1,823 Posted February 4 Report Share Posted February 4 10 minutes ago, chartpolski said: Lucy , Austrolalopithecus Afarensis. Cheers. The dating is wrong, she's 4000 year old, max! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.