Jump to content

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, mackem said:

True,happy clappy african churches in London,lot of immigrants are staunch Christians as the local church indicates.

Remember why God brought judgement on sodom and Gomorrah? They turned their back on the Lord and put the bumming to forefront of their nation, look at the west we live in today, and similarities with the rainbow brigade and the leaders of the left wing governments?

  • Like 3
  • Sad 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...

  • Replies 422
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

The king James is  written in Old English the newer versions are wrote in current English,if you put each bible side by side an checked each verse they'd be the same only in different English's,iv no

I think it’s worth saying that (imho) there is a massive difference between a belief/faith in something more & organised religion (a club). Let’s not forget that long before the written word

Get someone to read it with you mate Matthew’s a good start  try Proverbs or James something will jump out at you  all about having faith i found it similar to Francie no have a peace and co

Posted Images

Non biblical writings about jesus by flavius josepheus in a.d 93,called antiquities of the jews,josepheus was born ten years after jesus was crucified 

3. Now there was about this time Jesus, a wise man; if it be lawful to call him a man. For he was a doer of wonderful works; a teacher of such men as receive the truth with pleasure. He drew over to him both many of the Jews, and many of the Gentiles. He was [the] Christ. And when Pilate, at the suggestion of the principal men among us, had condemned him to the cross;7 those that loved him at the first did not forsake him. For he appeared to them alive again, the third day:8 as the divine prophets had foretold these and ten thousand other wonderful things concerning him. And the tribe of Christians, so named from him, are not extinct at this day.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 3 months later...
5 hours ago, Francie, said:

Christianity in Germany late 200 a.d

2018 archaeology discovery

 

Ballax, as though you trust science to age something....

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, Francie, said:

Lol so how did they date the site mate?

Oh, so now you believe in scientific dating when it suits, how convenient. Lol

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Pardus said:

Oh, so now you believe in scientific dating when it suits, how convenient. Lol

Here's the thing how did they date the find Germany?

Did they use radiometric dating mate?

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Francie, said:

Here's the thing how did they date the find Germany?

Did they use radiometric dating mate?

Truth be told I haven't watched the vid, but you make me laugh the way you use science when it conveniently suits your narrative. Lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

No they didn't use the flawed radiometric dating,they used the artifacts like pottery that Was found also.

So it's a proper real factual date,not a flawed radiometric one.

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Pardus said:

Oh, so now you believe in scientific dating when it suits, how convenient. Lol

 

Just now, Pardus said:

Truth be told I haven't watched the vid, but you make me laugh the way you use science when it conveniently suits your narrative. Lol

See your completely wrong mate,they never used the flawed radiometric dating,so no I'm not coviently using science,but here's the thing I love science,it backs the bible up.

You seem to thinking this radiometric dating is 100percent,when it clearly is not mate,that's the truth

Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Francie, said:

 

See your completely wrong mate,they never used the flawed radiometric dating,so no I'm not coviently using science,but here's the thing I love science,it backs the bible up.

You seem to thinking this radiometric dating is 100percent,when it clearly is not mate,that's the truth

So, how did they date it then? 

 

12 minutes ago, Francie, said:

 

See your completely wrong mate,they never used the flawed radiometric dating,so no I'm not coviently using science,but here's the thing I love science,it backs the bible up.

You seem to thinking this radiometric dating is 100percent,when it clearly is not mate,that's the truth

How did they date it then? And no, it's not 100%, never said that at all.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Pardus said:

So, how did they date it then? 

 

How did they date it then? And no, it's not 100%, never said that at all.

Artifacts like pottery 

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Francie, said:

Artifacts like pottery 

Eh? So, did it have the date scribed on it, if not, how do you know 100% that it's from that date?

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Pardus said:

Eh? So, did it have the date scribed on it, if not, how do you know 100% that it's from that date?

It was from roman pottery an roman gravesite mate

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...